That's not the point. The point is that it is one of many biased titles, and none that were biased in the other direction. Ergo, anything he writes is suspect, because he is clearly not an objective reporter/writer.
Are we supposed to have a vested interest in Putin winning big and not selling disinformation himself?
Nope. But again, not the point.
The point is the bias, not the specific claims. Not only is the writer biased, but he appeals to emotion, which is another indication of manipulation rather than objective journalism.
That's not the point. The point is that it is one of many biased titles, and none that were biased in the other direction. Ergo, anything he writes is suspect, because he is clearly not an objective reporter/writer.
Nope. But again, not the point.
The point is the bias, not the specific claims. Not only is the writer biased, but he appeals to emotion, which is another indication of manipulation rather than objective journalism.
What are the real numbers?
Russia put out some disinformation numbers themselves a couple of weeks ago.
What is really happening there?
How would I know?
How would you?
Exactly
Agreed, but again that does not mean we can't do some critical thinking to try and figure out which cliam(s) is closer to the truth.