Putin IGNORES Easter truce ... fresh attacks by Russians try to steal victory ...
Putin's invasion ...
Russian warmonger boasts ... will be ready to strike Britain by AUTUMN
Mass graves ... 'liberated' by Russia ... extent of Putin's carnage ... orders ... starve them to death
One of Putin's choppers ... blasted out of the sky
Marine Le Pen slumps in the polls ... a Russian puppet who would spark CIVIL WAR
Putin's Chechen warlord ...
Very one-sided. Plus, he has a weird way of capitalizing words in titles, which is not the "official" way of doing things (I do it all the time, but I don't get paid to promote propaganda like he does).
That's not the point. The point is that it is one of many biased titles, and none that were biased in the other direction. Ergo, anything he writes is suspect, because he is clearly not an objective reporter/writer.
Are we supposed to have a vested interest in Putin winning big and not selling disinformation himself?
Nope. But again, not the point.
The point is the bias, not the specific claims. Not only is the writer biased, but he appeals to emotion, which is another indication of manipulation rather than objective journalism.
Always consider the source.
Here is a list of articles by that author.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/home/search.html?s=&authornamef=David+Averre+For+Mailonline
Titles of articles:
Very one-sided. Plus, he has a weird way of capitalizing words in titles, which is not the "official" way of doing things (I do it all the time, but I don't get paid to promote propaganda like he does).
Author is right about Le Pen and the polls.
Are we supposed to have a vested interest in Putin winning big and not selling disinformation himself?
That's not the point. The point is that it is one of many biased titles, and none that were biased in the other direction. Ergo, anything he writes is suspect, because he is clearly not an objective reporter/writer.
Nope. But again, not the point.
The point is the bias, not the specific claims. Not only is the writer biased, but he appeals to emotion, which is another indication of manipulation rather than objective journalism.
What are the real numbers?
Russia put out some disinformation numbers themselves a couple of weeks ago.
What is really happening there?
How would I know?
How would you?