I watched the speech (with subtitles) and, later, read the speech.
In asymmetric warfare, in which disinformation is necessary, trust no one. Everyone and everything they say must be scrutinized and measured against their actions.
Agreed. However, that does not mean we throw up our hands and walk away because we can't know 100% for sure about the whole thing.
We can still evaluate certain specific claims. Either there was a coup in Ukraine in 2014 to overthrow the duly-elected government, or not. Turns out, there was. Plenty of resources to verify that out there.
Either that coup was funded by the US/CIA or not. If not, then funded by whom? Certainly, someone joined at the hip with US/CIA.
Either Putin's history lesson in his speech is more or less accurate, or not. Could be that he was making a lot of interpretations favorable to his case there, but the claims that US/NATO have been progressively encroaching towards Russia, while constantly lying and saying otherwise, is obviously true.
The weight of evidence tends to favor Putin's claims, and not the US's/CIA's/Fake News Media's claims. That doesn't mean he is 100% in the right, but it does mean that the US/CIA/Fake News Media is not.
It may just mean that we are watching a bad guy war against other bad guys.
Possible. My only concern in that scenario is that both bad guys are engaging in a fake war to target the free people of the world.
But I just don't believe that Putin would give a speech like he did if it was all fake. After all, the Fake News Media prostitutes will sell themselves to anyone they think is in power. They will promote any bullshit story.
So, who needs details and reasons for a military invasion? Just let the Fake News prostitutes get on their knees and do what they are paid to do.
Everything about this story makes me think that Putin is more on the good guy side than the bad guy side -- at least as it relates to his interests in Ukraine and fighting the NWO criminal mafia -- but it's just a hunch.
I watched the speech (with subtitles) and, later, read the speech.
In asymmetric warfare, in which disinformation is necessary, trust no one. Everyone and everything they say must be scrutinized and measured against their actions.
Agreed. However, that does not mean we throw up our hands and walk away because we can't know 100% for sure about the whole thing.
We can still evaluate certain specific claims. Either there was a coup in Ukraine in 2014 to overthrow the duly-elected government, or not. Turns out, there was. Plenty of resources to verify that out there.
Either that coup was funded by the US/CIA or not. If not, then funded by whom? Certainly, someone joined at the hip with US/CIA.
Either Putin's history lesson in his speech is more or less accurate, or not. Could be that he was making a lot of interpretations favorable to his case there, but the claims that US/NATO have been progressively encroaching towards Russia, while constantly lying and saying otherwise, is obviously true.
The weight of evidence tends to favor Putin's claims, and not the US's/CIA's/Fake News Media's claims. That doesn't mean he is 100% in the right, but it does mean that the US/CIA/Fake News Media is not.
Discernment, Pede.
Agree that there was a 2014 coup.
That doesn't mean that Putin is a good guy.
It may just mean that we are watching a bad guy war against other bad guys.
Possible. My only concern in that scenario is that both bad guys are engaging in a fake war to target the free people of the world.
But I just don't believe that Putin would give a speech like he did if it was all fake. After all, the Fake News Media prostitutes will sell themselves to anyone they think is in power. They will promote any bullshit story.
So, who needs details and reasons for a military invasion? Just let the Fake News prostitutes get on their knees and do what they are paid to do.
Everything about this story makes me think that Putin is more on the good guy side than the bad guy side -- at least as it relates to his interests in Ukraine and fighting the NWO criminal mafia -- but it's just a hunch.