Marshall law. MTG is not stupid. Why did she text this on Jan 17, 2021? More in comments...
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (23)
sorted by:
Maybe a mixture of 18 USC 3053 https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title18-section3053&num=0&edition=prelim
and possibly along with one of Senator Marshall's passed bills (now laws)
Dealing with a National Quantum Initiative Act (DATA) https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-bill/6227?r=13&s=3
or the DHS Field Engagement Accountability Act https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/504/text?r=23&s=3
Or Internet of Things Cybersecurity Improvement Act of 2020 or the IoT Cybersecurity Improvement Act of 2020 https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/1668?s=3&r=26 (Dominion :"publish standards and guidelines for the federal government on the appropriate use and management by agencies of IoT devices owned or controlled by an agency and connected to information systems owned or controlled by an agency, including minimum information security requirements for managing cybersecurity risks associated with such devices" )
Oooh, great digging! I am a federal contractor and had to research the Risk Management Framework which is getting inserted Into a lot of contracts. Like all things government, it is horrendously complicated by the documentation. But basically it is a process where the contractor shows the government it has the controls in place to mitigate adverse risk with their created product(s), especially by intrusion or having the software do unexpected things - like send data to China. The government then agrees with “Yea, verily” and the contractor is given the go ahead - the “Authority to Operate”. Cybersecurity risk is a big deal in DoD currently. But if you oversee voting machines... “meh”!