If jews and black people can openly discuss white genocide, then the opposite should be true.
Free speech is more about hanging hypocrites by their own nooses rather than simply letting everyone say what they want with no repercussions. Sure, you're free to say anything you want without going to jail, but that doesn't free you from the consequences of saying stupid inflammatory crap about a group of people.
If a white man called for the genocide of black people, I'm right there with the black people ready to tar and feather that bastard; verbally, of course.
If a black man called for the genocide of white people, I'm right there with the white people ready to tar and feather that bastard; verbally, of course.
I maintain the consistent approach to inflammatory speech, in that the government should keep its nose out of what people say and concern themselves only when someone's rights have been infringed. Speech cannot infringe a person's rights, only actions. To clarify, telling someone not to hire another because of their skin color is not speech, it's an act that led to a measurable outcome. This is why things like Affirmative Action is considered an ACTION and not borne out of speech. It's also why Affirmative Action is peak hypocrisy in any world where actions are louder than words.
Free Speech is the primary antagonist to hypocrisy. Feelings (should) have nothing to do with it.
Burn the hypocrites with their own words! That's the American Way! That's the Christian Way!
The question presumes a special status, and should be challenged before answerin. That's why the best response is another question:
Do you think that hatred of Jews is different from hatred of other groups? Do you believe that any group should receive special protection that others don't? Please be specific and clear.
There is truth within this statement. That makes it powerful, and is an issue that can't be discounted in any attempt to expose the truth of things. Associating "the crimes of the Jews" (which I believe is a misnomer) with all Jews will cause real hate towards many innocent people. Most people who are "Jews," either by descent or by religion (or both) are not complicit, anymore than the majority of people of any other subsect of We The People. This unwarranted hate towards the whole group, because of the crimes of a few hiding within the larger structure, further creates division, which is the primary tool of The Matrix to keep us locked within it.
I suggest we must be careful to keep our blame of "the Jews" in totality, with the specific crimes of "those people who call themselves Jews." It needs to be exposed that the idea of "anti-Semitism" was created specifically so that those people that hide amongst all Jews could commit their crimes. This group of criminals exists free from investigation through this manipulation, because any erstwhile investigator is fearful of being seen as "anti-Semitic." It creates a reason, and a belief structure, to motivate people to not investigate at all.
THAT is what needs to be exposed, just as much as, if not more than, the crimes of these people themselves. This manipulation that causes beliefs, hiding crimes, is The Matrix. The Matrix is far more powerful and far more of a threat to humanity than any other crime committed by anyone, no matter the group they belong to.
Well, yeah.. why not? You’d think they would make those posts permanent so they could at a later date ruin their lives with it, but instead they clean it all up so you don’t have to worry about that coming to bite you in the ass, so maybe censorship in that scenario works to the advantage 😂
If jews and black people can openly discuss white genocide, then the opposite should be true.
Free speech is more about hanging hypocrites by their own nooses rather than simply letting everyone say what they want with no repercussions. Sure, you're free to say anything you want without going to jail, but that doesn't free you from the consequences of saying stupid inflammatory crap about a group of people.
If a white man called for the genocide of black people, I'm right there with the black people ready to tar and feather that bastard; verbally, of course.
If a black man called for the genocide of white people, I'm right there with the white people ready to tar and feather that bastard; verbally, of course.
I maintain the consistent approach to inflammatory speech, in that the government should keep its nose out of what people say and concern themselves only when someone's rights have been infringed. Speech cannot infringe a person's rights, only actions. To clarify, telling someone not to hire another because of their skin color is not speech, it's an act that led to a measurable outcome. This is why things like Affirmative Action is considered an ACTION and not borne out of speech. It's also why Affirmative Action is peak hypocrisy in any world where actions are louder than words.
Free Speech is the primary antagonist to hypocrisy. Feelings (should) have nothing to do with it.
Burn the hypocrites with their own words! That's the American Way! That's the Christian Way!
The question presumes a special status, and should be challenged before answerin. That's why the best response is another question:
Or, "what is your definition of a Jew?"
I'm thinking along the lines of Khazarians.
There is truth within this statement. That makes it powerful, and is an issue that can't be discounted in any attempt to expose the truth of things. Associating "the crimes of the Jews" (which I believe is a misnomer) with all Jews will cause real hate towards many innocent people. Most people who are "Jews," either by descent or by religion (or both) are not complicit, anymore than the majority of people of any other subsect of We The People. This unwarranted hate towards the whole group, because of the crimes of a few hiding within the larger structure, further creates division, which is the primary tool of The Matrix to keep us locked within it.
I suggest we must be careful to keep our blame of "the Jews" in totality, with the specific crimes of "those people who call themselves Jews." It needs to be exposed that the idea of "anti-Semitism" was created specifically so that those people that hide amongst all Jews could commit their crimes. This group of criminals exists free from investigation through this manipulation, because any erstwhile investigator is fearful of being seen as "anti-Semitic." It creates a reason, and a belief structure, to motivate people to not investigate at all.
THAT is what needs to be exposed, just as much as, if not more than, the crimes of these people themselves. This manipulation that causes beliefs, hiding crimes, is The Matrix. The Matrix is far more powerful and far more of a threat to humanity than any other crime committed by anyone, no matter the group they belong to.
I could answer his question quite easily
Yes
I thought he left Twitter. LMAO!
He retweeted his own message, really!? What a loser.
I can smell the BS from a thousand miles away! i suppose there is one good reason for a mask after all......
yes talcum x, all speech is free speech
Talcum X is my favorite nickname for him. Followed closely by Snow J Simpson. LOL
Yes.
And not just Jews.
Clear enough?
Hey, maybe I'll get a Twitter account for the first time ever so I can actually reply to these idiots now!
Well, yeah.. why not? You’d think they would make those posts permanent so they could at a later date ruin their lives with it, but instead they clean it all up so you don’t have to worry about that coming to bite you in the ass, so maybe censorship in that scenario works to the advantage 😂
But that’s racist? They wouldn’t do that would they? /s