So basically, karl marx was the forerunner to every whiney liberal arts student in existence? Not that we didn't already know that, but this is too freaking funny and sad. Socialism, communism, marxism, etc. are literally the ideology of the worthless losers and scum of society.
Same with Trotsky. His uncle was a huge capitalist and was a huge influence on him. He would spend his holidays with him, and enjoy extravagant lifestyle, and get funded by his uncle to do his "revolutions for the poor"
Years ago, when I was a left, I read "The Lacuna" by Barbara Kingsolver
It made me feel sorry for Trotsky, who was a kind misunderstood idealist who was brutally and undeservedly murdered after he left politics.
Yes, I was that dumb!
Born in the United States, reared in a series of provisional households in Mexico—from a coastal island jungle to 1930s Mexico City—Harrison Shepherd finds precarious shelter but no sense of home on his thrilling odyssey. Life is whatever he learns from housekeepers who put him to work in the kitchen, errands he runs in the streets, and one fateful day, by mixing plaster for famed Mexican muralist Diego Rivera. He discovers a passion for Aztec history and meets the exotic, imperious artist Frida Kahlo, who will become his lifelong friend. When he goes to work for Lev Trotsky, an exiled political leader fighting for his life, Shepherd inadvertently casts his lot with art and revolution, newspaper headlines and howling gossip, and a risk of terrible violence.
Almost all literature is revisionist. Except perhaps Dostoevsky (going by how badly the left is trying to get rid of him). I was a liberal long back as well, and I never woke up and said I am a liberal. It just happened naturally as I used to love reading books and watching documentaries, reading history etc. There is such a subtle thread of propaganda in everything (I cant even call it propaganda since its so subtle). Now when I go back, its clear to see how slowly and methodically they imprinted ideas in our minds.
This is what I tell people when they say "The plan is not going fast enough". The enemy was so slow, so patient and so methodical and never once said "our plan is not going fast enough", and yet here we are, not even understanding the magnitude of what we are facing, complaining its not all over yet.
It's because of Trotsky, though, I started looking back at Stalin, and I am pretty convinced now that at some point Stalin turned against the Cabal. He basically purged all Trotsky loyalists, and Trotsky was the Cabal man in USSR. I am also rethinking Holodomor. There was a discussion here a few weeks ago and what we came up with was that Stalin turned communism against the Khazarians by collectivising the farms since Khazarian homeland of Ukraine was a big agricultural country. When the Khazarians, in their hypocritical fashion, fought back and refused to share their grains, he let them all starve.
He famously said "Tell me when they are starving so badly they start eating their own babies". Of course, this had always disgusted me about Stalin, but when you realise he was aiming this at the land of the Satanic people who kill and eat other people's babies, it takes a whole different meaning.
I believe the real atrocities happened in USSR under Lenin and Trotsky when they brutally murdered millions of white christians. Even the Holodomor is a red herring.
I believe the real atrocities happened in USSR under Lenin and Trotsky when they brutally murdered millions of white christians. Even the Holodomor is a red herring.
Thanks for this. I'm going to have to think about it. All these continual reversals of what I have always known are very hard to adjust to.
He basically purged all Trotsky loyalists, and Trotsky was the Cabal man in USSR
Yes, this part is easily demonstrated. It's just the reasons and motivation for the purge which is not full known at this point. Could be just a power grab.
I have such respect for your analysis that I am going to remember it and compare it to what I learn about Stalin in the future.
Thanks for this. I'm going to have to think about it. All these continual reversals of what I have always known are very hard to adjust to.
The best source for the terror during the early is Solzhenitzyn. Its very hard to find the two books he wrote about that period. The passages I remember talked about how the communists would put villagers - mostly Russian white christian peasants, in a barrel and drive sharp nails all around it, and then roll it down the hill. Honestly, I really hope that was not true.
I can't be sure that this did not continue for a period under Stalin. I am not really clear whether Stalin came in and purged, or he spent a few years as Cabal puppet before turning against them.
Could be just a power grab.
The most common official story is - he was consolidating power, but he became crazy and paranoid. The second part makes me think that they are lying. Whenever they claim a leader is crazy or paranoid (including Trump, Gaddafi, Saddam - pretty much all leaders who went against Cabal) I dont believe.
I have such respect for your analysis that I am going to remember it and compare it to what I learn about Stalin in the future.
As you know, this particular theory is just that, purely based on looking at the history with new intuition based on what I have learnt past 2 years. It might very well be completely off the mark.
If you do find anything else that throws more light on this, do share it with me.
Never having to hit a lick of the snake their whole entire lives, the government and guilded societies subsidizing the useless services they provide, as it holds no real value in the world. The day meritocracy died, was the day we became destin for hell in a hand basket.
Karl Marx suffered from abscesses all over his body, but particularly badly affected were his backside, his groin and under his armpits, which he himself described as 'a mess'. Painful lumps on his inner thigh would grind against his trousers, making even a short walk very difficult. Sitting was often impossible because of the carbuncles on his bottom. A large boil beneath the shoulder blade would make lying down quite an ordeal. In particularly black moods, Marx would hack at them with a cut-throat razor. Understandable, but not medically recommended. He lived in London for most of his adult life and all his doctor could do was recommend serious poisons that were once prescribed frequently for skin diseases. In the summer months, his physician would send him on bathing holidays to Margate for the 'sea cure' together with a prescription for arsenic three times a day. Marx felt that arsenic dulled his mind. It probably did a lot more besides. In dark days, and there were many, he would blame bourgeoisie 'swine' for his carbuncles. Modern thinking is that Marx suffered from a severe form of hidradenitis suppuritiva (sometimes abbreviated to HS). This is a relatively rare condition of the sweat glands that causes clusters of pus-filled abscesses, often in the nether regions where sweat glands proliferate. The Irish Skin Foundation has an excellent section about HS on its website.
WHEN AN EDUCATED MAN CHOOSES TO LIVE IN POVERTY, AND RAISE HIS CHILDREN IN POVERTY, THAT IS ABUSE.
Not only did the Marx children have to endure the hunger of poverty, they were raised in filth, or what his friend described as "a pig-sty".
Karl Marx and his wife had 7 children. Four of those children died young. Only three survived to achieve adulthood. Every biography of Marx reports that his four children who died young died because of the poverty they had to endure.
Instead, he sat in his pig-sty and found all sorts of reasons he shouldn't work.
Mainly, he thought he was too important to work. He didn't want to work, he wanted to sit in the filth at his table and pretend to be thinking important thoughts.
Watching his children go hungry, seeing them live in filth, is neglect. It is abuse. There was no need for it. He had an education and could have earned an income, and he knew where he had come from, a comfortable life with his parents. He could have provided for his family as his father had provided for him, but obviously that was not important to him.
His theory of Marxism has been a failure, too. The Soviet Union failed dramatically. Cuba's people live in poverty. And in North Korea the people truly are slaves to their Marxist beloved leader. Under Marxism, more than one hundred million people have died, either from being murdered or from starvation.
By any standard, Marx' life was a failure, as a husband, as a father, as a provider.
If you haven't done significant reading into Marx's personal life you should.
I don't toss around the word "evil" lightly. That man was pure fucking evil. 4 of his children died of neglect and 2 others committed suicide. Only one lived to old age and died of natural causes.
I would bet money that he was actually possessed by fucking demons.
I've met a few "philosophy majors" in my time that clung to the premise that they were "thinkers" and deserved to be able to just sit and drink and think "big thoughts" while being supported by others. How could we not see their importance to society?? It's totally self-evident!
So instead, this Luciferian loser leeched off his buddy Engels.
You will know them by their fruits
"Hidden Hand"
So basically, karl marx was the forerunner to every whiney liberal arts student in existence? Not that we didn't already know that, but this is too freaking funny and sad. Socialism, communism, marxism, etc. are literally the ideology of the worthless losers and scum of society.
Look at that pic of him, but imagine him with his hair in a man bun and wearing pajamas. He'd fit right in
He hardly ever washed himself, a right soap dodger.
Therefore, the reason
Upon his nether regions
Weeping, smelly, sores.
Same with Trotsky. His uncle was a huge capitalist and was a huge influence on him. He would spend his holidays with him, and enjoy extravagant lifestyle, and get funded by his uncle to do his "revolutions for the poor"
Years ago, when I was a left, I read "The Lacuna" by Barbara Kingsolver It made me feel sorry for Trotsky, who was a kind misunderstood idealist who was brutally and undeservedly murdered after he left politics.
Yes, I was that dumb!
https://www.bookbrowse.com/reviews/index.cfm/book_number/2344/The-Lacuna
It just shows how brainwashing revisionist literature is.
Almost all literature is revisionist. Except perhaps Dostoevsky (going by how badly the left is trying to get rid of him). I was a liberal long back as well, and I never woke up and said I am a liberal. It just happened naturally as I used to love reading books and watching documentaries, reading history etc. There is such a subtle thread of propaganda in everything (I cant even call it propaganda since its so subtle). Now when I go back, its clear to see how slowly and methodically they imprinted ideas in our minds.
This is what I tell people when they say "The plan is not going fast enough". The enemy was so slow, so patient and so methodical and never once said "our plan is not going fast enough", and yet here we are, not even understanding the magnitude of what we are facing, complaining its not all over yet.
It's because of Trotsky, though, I started looking back at Stalin, and I am pretty convinced now that at some point Stalin turned against the Cabal. He basically purged all Trotsky loyalists, and Trotsky was the Cabal man in USSR. I am also rethinking Holodomor. There was a discussion here a few weeks ago and what we came up with was that Stalin turned communism against the Khazarians by collectivising the farms since Khazarian homeland of Ukraine was a big agricultural country. When the Khazarians, in their hypocritical fashion, fought back and refused to share their grains, he let them all starve.
He famously said "Tell me when they are starving so badly they start eating their own babies". Of course, this had always disgusted me about Stalin, but when you realise he was aiming this at the land of the Satanic people who kill and eat other people's babies, it takes a whole different meaning.
I believe the real atrocities happened in USSR under Lenin and Trotsky when they brutally murdered millions of white christians. Even the Holodomor is a red herring.
Thanks for this. I'm going to have to think about it. All these continual reversals of what I have always known are very hard to adjust to.
Yes, this part is easily demonstrated. It's just the reasons and motivation for the purge which is not full known at this point. Could be just a power grab.
I have such respect for your analysis that I am going to remember it and compare it to what I learn about Stalin in the future.
The best source for the terror during the early is Solzhenitzyn. Its very hard to find the two books he wrote about that period. The passages I remember talked about how the communists would put villagers - mostly Russian white christian peasants, in a barrel and drive sharp nails all around it, and then roll it down the hill. Honestly, I really hope that was not true.
I can't be sure that this did not continue for a period under Stalin. I am not really clear whether Stalin came in and purged, or he spent a few years as Cabal puppet before turning against them.
The most common official story is - he was consolidating power, but he became crazy and paranoid. The second part makes me think that they are lying. Whenever they claim a leader is crazy or paranoid (including Trump, Gaddafi, Saddam - pretty much all leaders who went against Cabal) I dont believe.
Oh, I'm totally with you there. It just means that they don't want to discuss the motive.
As you know, this particular theory is just that, purely based on looking at the history with new intuition based on what I have learnt past 2 years. It might very well be completely off the mark.
If you do find anything else that throws more light on this, do share it with me.
95% of university professors are admitted Marxists. Sucking the teet their whole lives.
Never having to hit a lick of the snake their whole entire lives, the government and guilded societies subsidizing the useless services they provide, as it holds no real value in the world. The day meritocracy died, was the day we became destin for hell in a hand basket.
look at that hidden hand in the picture.
Nasty mason!
Nah, dude was just scratching his itchy pits. Habbens when ya don't bathe...
You suggesting he had fleas?
He does have that kinda look.
https://www.independent.ie/life/health-wellbeing/curse-of-big-boils-how-karl-marx-had-a-pain-in-his-bum-34876314.html
To humankind, he was the equivalent of the boils
on his behind.
Lordy, he must have stunk like a flytrap.
WHEN AN EDUCATED MAN CHOOSES TO LIVE IN POVERTY, AND RAISE HIS CHILDREN IN POVERTY, THAT IS ABUSE.
Not only did the Marx children have to endure the hunger of poverty, they were raised in filth, or what his friend described as "a pig-sty".
Karl Marx and his wife had 7 children. Four of those children died young. Only three survived to achieve adulthood. Every biography of Marx reports that his four children who died young died because of the poverty they had to endure.
Instead, he sat in his pig-sty and found all sorts of reasons he shouldn't work. Mainly, he thought he was too important to work. He didn't want to work, he wanted to sit in the filth at his table and pretend to be thinking important thoughts.
Watching his children go hungry, seeing them live in filth, is neglect. It is abuse. There was no need for it. He had an education and could have earned an income, and he knew where he had come from, a comfortable life with his parents. He could have provided for his family as his father had provided for him, but obviously that was not important to him.
His theory of Marxism has been a failure, too. The Soviet Union failed dramatically. Cuba's people live in poverty. And in North Korea the people truly are slaves to their Marxist beloved leader. Under Marxism, more than one hundred million people have died, either from being murdered or from starvation.
By any standard, Marx' life was a failure, as a husband, as a father, as a provider.
https://discover.hubpages.com/politics/KARL-MARX-ABUSED-HIS-CHILDREN
If you haven't done significant reading into Marx's personal life you should.
I don't toss around the word "evil" lightly. That man was pure fucking evil. 4 of his children died of neglect and 2 others committed suicide. Only one lived to old age and died of natural causes.
I would bet money that he was actually possessed by fucking demons.
Lol- Sounds like Bernie, kicked out of the commune for laziness.
WOW I never knew that
Yup, he was basically an entitled millennial brat.
He leached off everyone. Sat on his ass so long he got boils in it.
Didn't he knock up his hired help and then kick her out onto the steet?
The original basement neckbeard transexual furry
"Was Karl Marx a Satanist?" by Richard Wurmbrand
Yep, he was that, too.
I've met a few "philosophy majors" in my time that clung to the premise that they were "thinkers" and deserved to be able to just sit and drink and think "big thoughts" while being supported by others. How could we not see their importance to society?? It's totally self-evident!
(((karl marx)))
They really don't want people reading that book.
Marx was the OG incel? Makes sense.
I wouldn’t say incel… though he was a dead beat dad to his 7 kids (4 of whom died young)
Oh, yeah, he was a real basement dweller. He mooched his whole life. A pig.