The ideology is making a successful push due to lack of confidence and respect for our leadership.
(media.greatawakening.win)
🤡 MSM Conspiracy Theory 🤡
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (246)
sorted by:
Flat earthers dont like to test their theories. I can come up with math checks and simple tests to support globe model. Flat earthers cant do the same. In that way they dont really fit in here. Theyre more like the sheep we see everyday but instead of believing everything the government says, they believe the opposite. That makes them only slightly more correct than the sheep overall.
Not saying I'm a flat earther but have seen several instances where math supports flat earth.
But my question to you is, if the perpetrators of round earth conceived said concept, would they not also create the means of supporting it as well?
Kind of pointless to push an earth model only to have it debunked by some basic math/calculations.
I'm not a flat earther, nor a round earther, but at this point, anything and everything is up in the air.
If the Sun is a flying saucer pot light why does it always maintain its circular shape even during the sunset when it should look like in ellipse flying over the ocean really far away? Why does it look like a ball where our perspective to it is being cut off by the shape of the planet as it rotates?
This is an example of a question where you have to do mental gymnastics and hold cognitive dissonance ideas in your head to make this work in a flat Earth world.
The sun cannot be a flying projector light and look like it does and have sunsets. This is not a suggestion, it's an engineering reality.
Like FFS, just model it in 3D and look at what it looks like when the Sun goes around. The 3D model replication can be done with a globe model. It absolutely 100% cannot be done with a disc, it does not look like reality when you 3D model and explore the world as a disc.
Because the 3D modeling companies are in on it. ;). Haha
It's like these people never took a projector light and pointed it down at a surface and ask themselves what does looking up at that like light look like with the scales that I've used in my model.
Even if they don't know 3D programming all they have to do is take a pot light and a desk and put the pot light close to the desk so that it lights up half of it had to go and then move it around and look at the shape of the light changing as it moves further away from you and closer.
It's like somebody suggested that it was a projector and all of the flat earthers went oh okay and then nobody ever bothered to think about what it would actually look like if it was a projector.
But seriously though like f*** this would be one of the easiest things to set up as a scene in blender. Literally you put down a flat disk and a projector light source set to move on a circular path, then set the camera to be on the disk pointed at the projector.
It literally would have taken them like an afternoon to test it in the physical world and like probably 15 minutes if they knew what they were doing on the computer.