74
posted ago by Foomer ago by Foomer +74 / -0

What was the first delta, comms or coincidence proof that really shocked the internet into what the Q movement is now.

Other than hopium, what was the first "holy fuck, we have something special here" moment?

Comments (59)
sorted by:
28
Bama50 28 points ago +29 / -1

Q had me at Tippy top.

22
Lapstrake 22 points ago +22 / -0

Tippy Top made me dig deeper.

https://files.catbox.moe/s6rr4d.jpg

https://files.catbox.moe/v4n0ze.jpg

No Airforce Firetrucks have a designation of a letter followed by a number. Let alone a 'Q'. I spend a lot of time on that.

And also predicting No-Names death to the minute with a 30 day delta.

Stack up these unprobabilities.

It became certain that Q was not a larp.

7
MAGAMama2 7 points ago +7 / -0

It seems like no one is really doing in depth research like this any more. Or maybe I'm just not seeing it.

15
Lapstrake 15 points ago +15 / -0

Well I think it just isn't necessary any more.

We don't need more proofs.

We have no idea who Q is or what he, she or they are doing.

That is our lot in life here.

Our job is just to be aware. To be ready and understand that nothing is what it seems.

3
DRan 3 points ago +3 / -0

I would guess this has already been talked about, but it is a curiosity. 2014

https://www.jba.af.mil/News/Photos/igphoto/2000994757/

2
Bama50 2 points ago +2 / -0

I had forgotten about the firetruck. Thanks for the reminder.

1
Katrina241 1 point ago +1 / -0

Absolutely had me too.

I still didn't know if Q was white hat/black hat at this point though.

I did understand he was inside and in the know.

1
Katrina241 1 point ago +1 / -0

My reply above was in reference to no-name.

I knew by tippy-top.

6
InsanityRules 6 points ago +6 / -0

Had me when he told us when no name was going to die

1
Blandeaux 1 point ago +1 / -0

https://youtu.be/xSxKIpCpOAY tip top for the interested

19
redlotus69 19 points ago +19 / -0

I would guess the Saudi purge.

2
Foomer [S] 2 points ago +3 / -1

Early Q posts predicted a Saudi purge?

18
redlotus69 18 points ago +18 / -0

Q's first posts about HRC being arrested were bait for the deep state while the Saudi Purge was happening. Q later confirmed this. It was basically the first Q proof

5
PeaceAndLovePatriot 5 points ago +5 / -0

Yes this was good...

5
Aspie 5 points ago +5 / -0

Q didn't say Hillary was going to be arrested. Q was commenting on another anon's post. People keep thinking the anon post part was written by Q.

1
FlyingScotzman 1 point ago +1 / -0

Of course it has to be Q using a sock puppet account. The normie proof will be when Hillary does get arrested on Monday - Oct 30 (lines up for 2023), exactly like Q said.

Then Q says "HRC extradition...." which implies an arrest.

1
Aspie 1 point ago +1 / -0

No it doesn't. You left out most of the sentence. Q said that extradition was set up in a number of countries in case she tried to skip the country to someplace she thought was safer, not that she'd already been extradited from somewhere.

1
FlyingScotzman 1 point ago +1 / -0

u/#q1

in case she tried to skip the country

And why would she do that unless she's getting arrested?

  

Remember Trump tweeted several hours before post #0 about "Consecutive Q's...." and Durham was initiated the same day Q went public. And Trump said "Maybe it's the calm before the storm" 23 days before Q started. (Another hint for Hillary's arrest in 2023)

Are you really suggesting that Q waited for an anon to randomly make a LARP like that for Q to respond to and turn in into reality?

1
Aspie 1 point ago +1 / -0

That was the very first post thought to be Q. I don't think Q would have done a cold opening on 4chan.

1
Foomer [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

And that was in the beginning?

18
zanonks 18 points ago +18 / -0

For me it was the death of no name

5
FlyingScotzman 5 points ago +5 / -0

John McStain's death to the exact minute. Ohio gov'r saying "McStain was put to death"

Q also posted "Put to death" Bible verse a day after the no name post.

McCain's daughter saying "can't kill him again." Verification that Q really posted it before he died here.

17
EthelBarrett 17 points ago +17 / -0

He posted a pic that anons id'd as being legit from Air Force 1 at the time Trump was flying. It caused quite a stir. They thought it was either Trump himself, or someone with Trump.

11
JulesW 11 points ago +12 / -1

Lots of proofs, but look at the hit pieces on MSM. Thousands of them over the past 4 years. They are terrified, so that should tell you enough.

5
WeAreThePlan 5 points ago +5 / -0

That's how I got into Trump to begin with. The establishment hated him. That got my attention.

2
eyerighteye 2 points ago +2 / -0

Streisand effect is a bitch lol.

10
PeaceAndLovePatriot 10 points ago +10 / -0

A combination of gut instinct from early anons (personally I started following early nov '17) and proofs.

That combined with we had shit to lose at that point cause the world seemed like it was over anyways.

There are lists of proofs everywhere if you search. Videos too

10
Scorpion76 10 points ago +10 / -0

For me it was the whole "Tippy Toppy" thang, I rationalised it couldn't be simply coincidence. It was only hours before when it was suggested as a confirmation, oh and the white rabbit of course!

To be fair, when Q started posting on 4 chan most didn't take it seriously and tried to pick holes in it all.

9
Fefifofumdrum 9 points ago +10 / -1

I was introduced to Q through listening to Serial Brain 2 and And We Know. Then stuff started coming true and the decodes made sense to me. Just too much to dismiss.

"future proves past" and "there are no coincidences" and "how many times before it becomes mathematically impossible" for coincidences to happen that often...

9
Nightcereus 9 points ago +9 / -0
8
wannabe 8 points ago +8 / -0

Q was way more than cryptic predictions. It was the gathering of open source material put in one place for those that wanted to to research.

There were 5000 drops. That’s like five a day. There were a couple of them that were unexplainable or flat out wrong. So what no one bats 1000.

What I find odd is that most of the hit jobs on Q don’t even target actual Q postings, but some bullshit that actual Q followers never heard of.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
3
wannabe 3 points ago +3 / -0

Why was Q not brushed off easily as a larp? That was the question. If my statement is true then it doesn’t matter if Q was a larp.

7
numina18 7 points ago +7 / -0

It was not larpish from the get go. It made a lot of sense, and was filled with knowledge of many different milieus. I never questioned it because it just made a lot of sense. Also, I had been awakened previously to Q, so it fit with all that info, too. No one could have made all those posts up "for a larp". They knew too much.

1
Foomer [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm looking for a specific example rather than anecdotal experiences.

Ideally a early "boom" post or a early prediction that proves true. There must have been something that stood out early in the posts that made people pay attention rather than brush it off as a LARP.

5
Litecola2 5 points ago +5 / -0

That is difficult, because the people paying attention were already deepest in the research already, and they got a feeling this was different and then pushed for proof. For me, I was into conspiracy research and following their threads, then followed the 'pros' poking into the new guy/s and debating, just before the team started signing off as Q.

I started following after the leads were more convinced than not, and the crumbs were all valid, corroborating but not rehashed older material. The more solid proofs began with the near-simultaneous POTUS Twitter posts, then timing and crumbs around significant events that provided better explanations than the official narratives, such as the vegas massacre and subsequent SA housecleaning. The insider photos from the WH and AF1 were golden, and then asking POTUS to use particular words was fantastic, these were winks and affirmations that Q was in there. But to serious researchers, the crumbs themselves were proofs, as they led autists to tie things together that had not been clearly connected previously and framed out the most plausible paths of corruption that anyone yet had uncovered. Validation of pizzagate and other prior lines of investigation was valuable, but jumpstarting the connection threads from those to new faces and names was even more so.

I followed through chans to voat to here and kun, with gab and telegram along the way, waiting for TrumpSocial to be available on my machines and still tracking my areas of specialty/interest within them. Now, folks who are newer will have different points of entry, but I would hazard that their convincing started before they dug deeply, so they might not have a clear 'aha' moment as much as an "I thought so" confirmation. Most people don't have dramatic Eureka Boom instants, even though that makes for good TV...

3
MichaelConservative 3 points ago +3 / -0

Holy cow, this is deep Litecola2, I respect what you have done. I only really "awakened" in Jan. of 2021. I thought AJ was the fringe and best conspiracy theorist before, but it is seeming that it may not be the case. I'm thankful for the new things I learn on this website from sages such as yourself. I mean sage as in, length of wisdom, not calling you old per say. I have much to still learn. I suck at digging.

2
Litecola2 2 points ago +2 / -0

Well that was unnecessarily flattering, lol

It's cool, don't react emotionally to what you find, there will be a LOT, just consider many anons have dug things up for years and some have paid heavy prices for it. Determine what your gifts are and realize you're put here on purpose with a purpose for a purpose, so get to it! I say that in brotherly love, soldier.

1
eyerighteye 1 point ago +1 / -0

Twas off deep in a NESARA/RV hole when Q started posting. All I can say is Q pointed to interesting things that all fit.

1
Darstradamus 1 point ago +1 / -0

Who you write for? You don't seem to be seeking knowledge, but a quote to use.

4
Boomahremovah 4 points ago +4 / -0

We have the tippiest of tops, OP.

4
Shimp_Nation 4 points ago +4 / -0

This one of the first proofs I believe…… https://vid8.poal.co/user/QStorm_Videos/3vbLWRd

4
bekkiluvsit 4 points ago +4 / -0

One proof for me, I was following Q's precurser - MegaAnon on the half chan. When Q came on the scene, MegaAnon, she quietly bowed out and quit posting, which we presumed was not to conflict with Q's operation, which back then, was on the half chan.

4
sakmode 4 points ago +4 / -0

MegaAnon was full of shit and denied Q. That part is always left conveniently out of people's posts on Mega. She "came round" later, according to her, but she was no "precursor to Q" in any way.

6
muhqtardtho 6 points ago +6 / -0

Everybody knows the real precursor was fbianon.

3
Darstradamus 3 points ago +3 / -0

This.

3
KimJung-Un 3 points ago +6 / -3

Frankly, the way the first Q wrote, to me, seems very different than the returned Q wrote.

I am suspect of everything including Trump and Q and that will never change until the rotten are imprisoned and the details of human trafficking involving hollywood and politicians is publicly displayed.

But until then I will give them the benefit of the doubt.

6
Scorpion76 6 points ago +6 / -0

It's interesting you should say that about human trafficking and Hollywood, as out of sheer boredom I watched a few mins of the Depp/Heard soap opera going on.

It was about the promise Heard made to donate 3.5 million, when in fact she only donated 350k from her divorce settlement to the ACLU. Now what struck me as strange was who else donated on her behalf making it look like she donated more.

Jonnhy D also gave 100k and Elon Musk donated 500k (interesting) but also Vanguard donated a large chunk, 350k. Can anyone explain why Vanguard would donate on her behalf.

She never did donate the promised 3.5 million btw, the lying pos.

8
KimJung-Un 8 points ago +8 / -0

The connections these degenerates have is incredible. Some low level C grade shitty actress and the second largest investment firm on the planet giving donations together lmao. Great observations

3
Scorpion76 3 points ago +3 / -0

Thanks, it really struck me as very odd that Vanguard, and also Elon Musk would donate so much with zero to gain publicly as it went through the books to make it seem like Heard had donated.

So I guess the question is what does Vanguard (and those that are at the top) use Amber Heard for, hmmmm.

"Follow the stars" springs to mind!

3
KimJung-Un 3 points ago +3 / -0

I don't think she's got 200 bucks to her name if I'm gonna be honest. I think most these hollywood geeks are given an allowance to spend and any expenditure is carefully audited by their handlers. The lambos and big houses are made to house these people in specific communities where they can be watched.

2
Scorpion76 2 points ago +2 / -0

It's life Kim, but not as we know it! ;)

1
PeaceAndLovePatriot 1 point ago +1 / -0

Thats cause they are a team.

2
FlyingScotzman 2 points ago +2 / -0

There were many good coincidences right from the start. The Saudi Mass Arrests were only 6 days after Q started.

Plane takes out a helicopter next to the Rothschild's house on November 17th. Rest In Peace Cpt. Green.

And still one of the best Q/twitter coincidences happened just over a month later.

2
lsvogel 2 points ago +2 / -0

Content and to research what was posted before everything was 'scrubbed' from the internet. Turns out, we verified much as fact! And still ongoing... (Q follower since day one; 10/28/2017...)

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
winn 1 point ago +1 / -0

Deltas w Trump, and impossible coincidential habbenings Trump admin was doing which Q preemptively posted about, News unlocks Map

1
Katrina241 1 point ago +1 / -0

You asked a great question.

It all, from the beginning, held an element of cohesiveness. Claims/statements would be made and before they could be discredited, bits and strands of those claims came together. In researching to disprove, anons were discovering things through the subtle guidance they were being given. Anons were like,

"Wow, look here...I found these documents on that Q post that put these elements together in the same place/saying~doing exactly as Q said."

Those tenuous connections made you want to dig further on the more outrageous claims. Constantly pushing anons to 'build the clock' let anons know most elements of the Q posts were time sensitive. Anons started looking for future proves past connections...and by damn, there were lots of them.

For me, the final proof that swept away all doubt we were dealing with some brilliant lunatic laughing at us behind his cover of anonymity was the tippy-top.

I wasn't one of the smart ones who built the clock or wove all the connections into cohesive cloth...but I recognized the significance of what appeared to be a biblical, godly hand over the unfolding Q drops. That allowed me to carry off the information being shared in those early days and posting it on many forums.

I could discern the greatness of the Q movement and the purpose readily enough. I think a lot of anons were operating on faith in those early days.