It's funny, because I bought a construction company, but had two others also invest in it. I own 60%, they each own 20%.
I take the jobs I want, turn down the ones I don't. They have suggestions and ideas {one is actually the estimator}. I can listen, or ignore or go have a wank in the corner.
Daily Mail is often a mouthpiece for the left - I guess one should start by asking about the timing of this article - it's right after the small release of info from Devin Nunes about Trump encouraging Musk to buy Twitter.
To me it feels like a counter-narrative. If Al Waleed Bin Talal was getting back into the Twitter game you wouldn't see everyone on the left freaking out.
If this is true, it confirms something I have been theorising. This is the WHs forcing the bad guys who lost all their assets due to Trump EO to play along in this show and use some of their "wealth" in doing things like this. I have already said that Elon is being forced into this show and his shares in Tesla doesn't really belong to him, but to the white hats.
A lot of those 18 entities/people have connections to a lot of the short sellers in the whole GameStop saga. Which makes me wonder if the plan is for them to go bankrupt when GME (and any other heavily shorted companies) moons and then Truth Social comes in and buys up the remnants of Twitter for real cheap...
The way I see it, is the scum alaweed only will hold around 5% of a private company. So the control is in the 'owner' (Elon) of a private company. They don't have a board that can fire the owner or demand the direction of the company. Elon will have control over the content and the free speech aspect afaik.
It's funny, because I bought a construction company, but had two others also invest in it. I own 60%, they each own 20%.
I take the jobs I want, turn down the ones I don't. They have suggestions and ideas {one is actually the estimator}. I can listen, or ignore or go have a wank in the corner.
It's weird how that works.
"I say fuck the Gunderson project. Imma go have me a wank in the corner."
Point well taken.
Is that what guys do in corners?
Some guys
Trump and Elon are on this together, as confirmed by Nunes.
I read elsewhere that Al Waleed just was released from detention. Perhaps he bought his freedom by helping Elon Musk buy Twitter.
Daily Mail is often a mouthpiece for the left - I guess one should start by asking about the timing of this article - it's right after the small release of info from Devin Nunes about Trump encouraging Musk to buy Twitter.
To me it feels like a counter-narrative. If Al Waleed Bin Talal was getting back into the Twitter game you wouldn't see everyone on the left freaking out.
The Saudi was already one of Twitter’s largest shareholders.
No, used to be.
He didn't lose his shares.
https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2022/4/15/musk-faces-off-with-saudi-prince-talal-over-bid-to-buy-twitter
Or him saying so could easily be a troll. Weren’t we thinking his assets were seized when he was arrested?
If this is true, it confirms something I have been theorising. This is the WHs forcing the bad guys who lost all their assets due to Trump EO to play along in this show and use some of their "wealth" in doing things like this. I have already said that Elon is being forced into this show and his shares in Tesla doesn't really belong to him, but to the white hats.
plausible
Bingo...compile evidence, reconcile, form logical conclusion. Spot on
A lot of those 18 entities/people have connections to a lot of the short sellers in the whole GameStop saga. Which makes me wonder if the plan is for them to go bankrupt when GME (and any other heavily shorted companies) moons and then Truth Social comes in and buys up the remnants of Twitter for real cheap...
All info is good info, except when it's not. Thanks for posting. Will be using discernment.
Perhaps they've been told to do this, help Elon, or die.
The way I see it, is the scum alaweed only will hold around 5% of a private company. So the control is in the 'owner' (Elon) of a private company. They don't have a board that can fire the owner or demand the direction of the company. Elon will have control over the content and the free speech aspect afaik.
He already had a large investment in Twitter stock.