Some thirty years ago we are told that another draft opinion, reversing Roe, was circulated among the Justices, although not leaked to the public. We are told, further, that the sharp reaction to this proposed draft reversal of Roe on the part of pro-abortion Justices persuaded three Justices -- O'Connor, J., Souter, J., and Kennedy, J. -- to change course and join in a concurring opinion that left the so-called "essential holding" of Roe intact, while subject to a new and unduly vague "undue burden" test applicable to state efforts to regulate and restrict abortion.