I can't know this, of course, but it appears your understanding of events is from Jewish-inspired sources...all contaminated by propaganda.
It's possible Germany could have used captured French trucks as cover for Operation Barbarossa, although I am not familiar with this particular claim.
I also am not aware of the claims of Hitler breaking his word to other leaders. I DO know, however, that Hitler gave Poland months of warnings when ethnic Germans were being tortured and executed within Poland's borders. Poland did this to egg Germany into invading, because they had just made a protectionist agreement with Britain, that Britain would come to their aid, as well as give them reparation monies in the event of an attack.
Similarly, Hitler begged Churchill for several weeks, to stop Britain's bombing campaign against German civilian targets. Churchill broke international agreements by doing so. What was happening was the War was winding down, and Germany was no closer to being crushed like Churchill wanted. He knew if he could get Hitler to bomb London, that he could convince FDR to commit American troops. Churchill is more to blame for the London bombings than Hitler.
There are few, single, more horrific acts of war than the firebombing of Dresden. Yet, we rarely hear about it. More people died in Dresden than Hiroshima and Nagasaki combined. There were NO military targets in Dresden, yet Churchill, FDR, and Eisenhower leveled the city, as well as many, many other targets. Where was the justification for this? By doing so, the bombing absolutely obliterated Germany's infrastructure, and ability to maintain food and medical services to the camps. When the Allies arrived, they blamed the horrible condition at the camps on the Germans, when it was their own fault. It's all spin, and propaganda.
Eisenhower intentionally changed the classification of German military prisoners so he could avoid following the laws of the Geneva Convention. German soldiers were treated worse than animals, starved, tortured, and executed.
So, I find there are many, many more reasons to call Stalin, Churchill, and FDR war criminals (as well as Eisenhower), than Hitler. Most of the ethnic peoples in Europe at the time, loved Hitler, because they saw him as the only obstacle in the way of communism.
I can't know this, of course, but it appears your understanding of events is from Jewish-inspired sources...all contaminated by propaganda.
It's possible Germany could have used captured French trucks as cover for Operation Barbarossa, although I am not familiar with this particular claim.
I also am not aware of the claims of Hitler breaking his word to other leaders. I DO know, however, that Hitler gave Poland months of warnings when ethnic Germans were being tortured and executed within Poland's borders. Poland did this to egg Germany into invading, because they had just made a protectionist agreement with Britain, that Britain would come to their aid, as well as give them reparation monies in the event of an attack.
Similarly, Hitler begged Churchill for several weeks, to stop Britain's bombing campaign against German civilian targets. Churchill broke international agreements by doing so. What was happening was the War was winding down, and Germany was no closer to being crushed like Churchill wanted. He knew if he could get Hitler to bomb London, that he could convince FDR to commit American troops. Churchill is more to blame for the London bombings than Hitler.
There are few, single, more horrific acts of war than the firebombing of Dresden. Yet, we rarely hear about it. More people died in Dresden than Hiroshima and Nagasaki combined. There were NO military targets in Dresden, yet Churchill, FDR, and Eisenhower leveled the city, as well as many, many other targets. Where was the justification for this? By doing so, the bombing absolutely obliterated Germany's infrastructure, and ability to maintain food and medical services to the camps. When the Allies arrived, they blamed the horrible condition at the camps on the Germans, when it was their own fault. It's all spin, and propaganda.
Eisenhower intentionally changed the classification of German military prisoners so he could avoid following the laws of the Geneva Convention. German soldiers were treated worse than animals, starved, tortured, and executed.
So, I find there are many, many more reasons to call Stalin, Churchill, and FDR war criminals (as well as Eisenhower), than Hitler. Most of the ethnic peoples in Europe at the time, loved Hitler, because they saw him as the only obstacle in the way of communism.