No there doesn't need to be a chain of custody established. The very fact that people were stuffing multiple ballots -any multiple ballots - into a box 25 times a day, then turning around and peeling off the latex gloves they had on and dropping them in a conveniently-placed trash barrel is more than enough to charge them with a crime. Because that alone is a crime. Wake up!
I'm agreeing with you. I'm saying if these people were voting for relatives or friends, they need to be able to identify exactly who they were submitting the votes for and why. They can't do that, and that's therefore proof enough of a crime.
If that were the case, there needed to be solid chain of custody on those ballots. There isn't.
No there doesn't need to be a chain of custody established. The very fact that people were stuffing multiple ballots -any multiple ballots - into a box 25 times a day, then turning around and peeling off the latex gloves they had on and dropping them in a conveniently-placed trash barrel is more than enough to charge them with a crime. Because that alone is a crime. Wake up!
I'm agreeing with you. I'm saying if these people were voting for relatives or friends, they need to be able to identify exactly who they were submitting the votes for and why. They can't do that, and that's therefore proof enough of a crime.