Comments (35)
sorted by:
SneakyWino 22 points ago +22 / -0

Hang 'em high!!

GizzardPuke 13 points ago +13 / -0

...and shoot them low.

fje33 8 points ago +8 / -0

In the diznik

aumone 17 points ago +22 / -5

My hopes and prayers run high, but with each passing day, I must again state this:

I have not seen ONE person who has committed treason be arrested.

So if what Brandon and company are planning on doing is treason my only question is this.

Who will arrest them?

Godisgloryy 5 points ago +5 / -0

NO ONE, all are in cahoots and I do not want to think our President DJT is too. It gives me the creeps just to think about it. I had had my doubts sometimes, but Hopefully Jesus Christ our Lord get us out of this mess.

ACTS1711 5 points ago +9 / -4

How many times do we tell everyone, you just wait and boy are they going to get it and how many times do we look like conspiracy idiots, because nothing ever happens in the public eye?

400DollarHandcart 7 points ago +10 / -3

I have lost more friends for sounding like an idiot by saying someone will be punished for their deeds. Whether people believe as we do or are completely asleep, EVERYONE knows the elite do not face consequences for their crimes.

ACTS1711 5 points ago +5 / -0

I totally understand. I don't want to be "the boy who cried wolf".

We know they've been lying to us just about everything. The one thing you can't do is get ahead of your reinforcements ala General George Armstrong Custer or you will be savaged. Remember he went it alone but the other Cavalry was coming full head with Gatling guns?

Vaccine side effects? No problem. You tell the people about Ivermectin and advise against getting anymore shots.

There has to be a time when the EBS is intiated and the people informed.

KickingPugilist 3 points ago +3 / -0

Custer sent the message for the multi pronged attack to push forward, but some held back.

He didn't do it out of bravado, per se, just that the communication breakdown when the other fronts didn't push forward and his Intel underestimating the amount of Indians actually at Little Big Horn did him in.

ACTS1711 1 point ago +1 / -0

Didn't the Indians have Winchester's and Custer's men had single shot Springfield 45 70 carbines?

Custers men were hacked to pieces as the Indians didn't want them coming back in the after life.

A side note, there was a Twilight Zone episode about that event and of course it was about going back in time. It was pretty good.

KickingPugilist 2 points ago +2 / -0

Indians had far better weaponry, even if they were firing off caliber rounds which showed in some of the wounds in the men's skulls.

They also came from all directions in wave after wave, had the other prongs of the attack pushed in, there's a chance they would have succeeded.

Again, though, his recon vastly underestimated the numbers. They employed Indians as well as they knew the land and terrain, but I don't think they sabotaged him so much as they just didn't get a good enough gauge.

What is fascinating is seeing the different portrayals of Custer from the patriotic hero played by Errol Flynn, to the over confident, arrogant dunce in "Little big man" filmed during the native American revival of the 80s.

He was an asshole in Tonka, a Disney film from the 50s as well.

There was a documentary where they revisited the battle site and traced what most likely happened based on bullet patterns and things like that, not sure how much they can accurately piece together from that, but it was a story so encapsulated in myth and legend, that it's truly difficult to pinpoint.

Custer himself actually had an admiration for the warrior nature of the Indians and saw them as a worthy foe. He had seen plenty of battle in the Civil War and was essentially at unrest out of his element so he went into the Indian wars where he ultimately perished.

ACTS1711 1 point ago +1 / -0

You know history. It's always altered. The Indians used gorilla war tactics.

mengderen 3 points ago +3 / -0

I just tell 'em "The best is yet to come", and just wait and see what that means..

ACTS1711 2 points ago +2 / -0

I like it and sound advice. Also positive and uplifting.

MidnightToker 3 points ago +3 / -0

In NY the police will ticket you like a Nazi for having tinting windows. Killing over 3000 elderly in nursing homes is ok.

FEARNOT 2 points ago +3 / -1

Sometimes criminals must be shot to stop them. That's why cops carry guns. :)

Chad_Prime 13 points ago +13 / -0

Maybe this is the line... The one that must be crossed to justify wholesale action.

Signing United States sovereignty over to a foreign body (effectively nullifying the constitution} is the final act of gross treason, in my book. You think things have tumbled fast since PEDOTUS and the DS stole the election? Wait and see what happens after the worldwide cabal is given official control.

If this is done then the white hats must step in. Because at that point we are no longer one nation under God, and the white hats risk losing control of the citizen patriots who will be drawn ever closer to taking that stand.

I feel like this may be the precipice that Q referred to.

mengderen 3 points ago +3 / -0

Re: the Law of War manal..

KickingPugilist 5 points ago +5 / -0

Hasn't most of that Law of War manual conditions been satisfied? At one point can your country be taken hostage and you have to let them fuck your mother land in every orifice before you can justify defending your nation?

The 1 year time frame came and went, the damage Has been ever-increasing.

Another cou try can do what it wants and you have to let them destroy you before you can step in?

Knight-errant 5 points ago +5 / -0

The whole Law of War manual theory has always rubbed me the wrong way. It's absolutely absurd to think that we'd have to allow an enemy to occupy us for a set amount of time before we could fight back. It's completely contradictory to natural law.

"Honey, someone broke into our house and is robbing us!" "Sorry babe, I have to let him stay for at least 1 day before I can fight back."

It's just silly.

BigJilm01 1 point ago +1 / -0

It is absurd

KickingPugilist 1 point ago +1 / -0

That's kind of like how it is in Spain when you get squatters settle in. It can be absurdly difficult to get them out, meanwhile you basically have to continue to pay for the utilities..

mengderen 1 point ago +1 / -0

The one thing to remember here is this: as bad as it is now, the precipice moment has not arrived yet. You ain't seen nothing YET.

MichaelConservative 1 point ago +1 / -0

+1 Year waiting period has entered the chat

Chad_Prime 2 points ago +2 / -0

Perhaps. Old school vets like me... We pray for the plan.

But just in case, we are not afraid.

Good bless us and provide the air cover we need to stand against this evil.

Jenmon 3 points ago +3 / -0


The_Expert 5 points ago +5 / -0

a few days ago, a few of his old videos were uploaded to Rumble. I just started following him and didn't notice it until I read in the comments "why are these old videos showing as new." Everything he said in the videos never came true. One was about how Canada's government was going to collapse and JT was going to be kicked out and a new government was going to be put in. Does anything thig guy say come true?

_Obelisk_ 5 points ago +5 / -0

Well, you have now discovered what many discovered about Cliff long ago. He’s full of shit.

dandy_wieners 5 points ago +5 / -0

Lol yep thats our boy. I think clif is educated and he really believes in what hes saying, but he is wrong A LOT. Especially as you say when you rewatch old prediction videos like those. He also says earth will be surrounded by debris so space flight and satellites will be compromised. Well, when Clif?

KickingPugilist 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yeah I personally just enjoy his commentary but don't take his predictions as kosher. He's a very knowledgeable person and has great commentary.

magavoices 2 points ago +2 / -0

This is why Q, in their wisdom, had us be an anon movement. We're supposed to value information over celebrity.

Much of what this guy says is bullshit, more so than Alex Jones.

And his advocates are way over the board and in-your-face if you disagree to the point they appear to be a psyop.

deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
marcellapalaferri 3 points ago +3 / -0

Gotta love the Woo!

TurdFergueson2 2 points ago +2 / -0

WEF WHO did you collaborate with!?!?

VetforTrump 2 points ago +2 / -0

Gabbard, Crenshaw. Buttegeig, Swallwell and thousands of others.