292
Comments (28)
sorted by:
20
xchainlinkx 20 points ago +20 / -0

That's where they got their 5% from? 😂

17
FEARNOT 17 points ago +18 / -1

Criminals are called lawyers and they love to hide their crimes by whining to a criminal in a black dress.

17
ImWaterjug 17 points ago +17 / -0

Lawyers are some of the best liars you will ever meet

14
wolveshuntinpacks 14 points ago +14 / -0

I personally enjoy how "lawyer" is pronounced exactly the same as "liar" in many places in the deep south.

3
Enlightenment_Now 3 points ago +3 / -0

Hear, hear!

Here, here!

11
FEARNOT 11 points ago +12 / -1

I knew a man that got 4 DWI's in less than 30 days. He had already has several over the prior years. He got the 4 in different counties. He had a high dollar attorney. He walked away from all 4. That is back when a 3rd offense was a mandatory 10 years in jail. Justice and extra punishment is only for us regular people.

6
MAG768720 6 points ago +6 / -0

I met a guy recently who turned out to be a lawyer. Social situation.

He is a DUI lawyer. Said he has a client on his 5th or 6th DUI.

He was bragging that he talked to the prosecutor, the prosecutor offered a "good deal" considering the situation.

Lawyer said to the prosecutor, "We will take that -- but just give me a couple of months to drag it out, so I can justify the $15,000 he is paying me."

Fucking scumbags.

1
queue-anon 1 point ago +1 / -0

Isn’t it up to the judge?

1
FreeKyleRightNow 1 point ago +1 / -0

That’s what they’re paid for.

1
lightindarkness 1 point ago +1 / -0

why lie when the truth is so flexible....

3
MAG768720 3 points ago +3 / -0

Sounds kinda funny in a dark way, but that is EXACTLY what they are taught in today's law schools.

They are taught that there is no right or wrong, no good or bad, no truth or falsehood. Only what you can argue to win your case, no matter which side you are "representing."

"If you were representing the prosecution/plaintiff, how would you argue? OK, now if you were representing the defense, how would you argue?"

No evaluation of what is right or wrong. And no consideration for what is constitutional or not -- what government does NOT have the authority to do is ignored.

Did everyone notice that in the past 2 years that 99.99% of all attorneys in the USA said NOTHING about the criminal acts of the politicians and bureaucrats? Forget about filing lawsuits to stop the madness, they didn't even SAY shit.

13
RocketScientist 13 points ago +13 / -0

Oh.. oh.. Elon's in trouble now. How will he recover?

26
penisse [S] 26 points ago +26 / -0

Buying the legal company and firing its people?

9
RocketScientist 9 points ago +9 / -0

kek

9
DireCarbon 9 points ago +9 / -0

So in sampling for bots, twitter found 5 bots.......seems legit.

3
OriginalRealityCheck 3 points ago +3 / -0

Depends on which hundred you look at.

If the first random 100 doesn't suit you, look at another random 100.

Repeat until you find a set you like....

1
DeathRayDesigner 1 point ago +1 / -0

I seem to recall that a rough rule of thumb is that a measure of the sample error is the square root of the sample size. For a sample of 100, this would be 10...or 10%. So, the answer would be 5% bots---plus or minus 10%.

4
swedy13 4 points ago +5 / -1

Those comments are pure aids

2
CokeOrPepe 2 points ago +2 / -0

Vaids prolly

1
queue-anon 1 point ago +1 / -0

Bots

4
ceegeegee 4 points ago +4 / -0

How dare you reveal the fact we lie to our shareholders! What a bunch of maroons...

1
queue-anon 1 point ago +1 / -0

Morans*

“Get a Brian moran!”

2
polish_snausage 2 points ago +2 / -0

The responses are hilarious--- NPC's got their attack orders

2
queue-anon 2 points ago +2 / -0

Bots

2
Razo 2 points ago +2 / -0

Haha shine the light on the roaches!!! They LOVE operating in the shadows. Bring the truth to light and they REEEEEEEEEE

1
AReckoningIsComing 1 point ago +1 / -0

Most of POTUS account are bots. I sampled first 50 and all have 0 followers and weird numbers in names with acc started this month!!

1
Cyberhawk 1 point ago +1 / -0

So 5% out of 100? Is that what he means? So what’s Twatter’s total usage? I’ve some say 300 million users. So that’s like what 15 million bots?

Patrick “that’s a lot of $&@?!:/& bots!”

1
pawzo 1 point ago +1 / -0

Just buy this Twatter, censor and ban all the Elites and puppets and get over with all this buying Twat drama.