I was perfectly able to tell what he meant; people here are jumping on every typo, correcting grammar, etc, and it's pretty ridiculous when we know that many people are moving fast and on a phone in many cases.
If you REALLY COULDN'T TELL what was meant, well, I guess you can infer what I think of that...probably?
It derails the conversation. I cannot count the times a interesting comment or post goes off topic and is sabotaged. It drives me crazy. And disinformation trolls are really good at doing so. So stay on topic don't get distracted. Says guy who gets sidelined so easily. 🤔
Allowing people to topic hijack ruins your rankings on the search engines as well. The ranking algorithm can tell when a thread wanders all over the place. It's less valuable to readers then, and is placed lower in the rankings.
Fine fine perhaps I am just tired of all the corrections.
As far as "wide open" if you are inferring anything's actually wrong there vs just going for a more highfalutin tone, we can go to the whiteboard for diagramming. The only thing I'd say is technically unnecessary/incorrect is the comma after "well."
As for "think it through" like I say the general objection here is how many people (through being bored, autists, dicks, or some combination or whatever) are pointing out typos etc when it just wastes time and space (oh the irony).
Oh FFS
???
Did you prefer he move "not" to before the second the?
.
Just having fun while asking for clarification. Sentence makes no sense.
I was perfectly able to tell what he meant; people here are jumping on every typo, correcting grammar, etc, and it's pretty ridiculous when we know that many people are moving fast and on a phone in many cases.
If you REALLY COULDN'T TELL what was meant, well, I guess you can infer what I think of that...probably?
It derails the conversation. I cannot count the times a interesting comment or post goes off topic and is sabotaged. It drives me crazy. And disinformation trolls are really good at doing so. So stay on topic don't get distracted. Says guy who gets sidelined so easily. 🤔
Allowing people to topic hijack ruins your rankings on the search engines as well. The ranking algorithm can tell when a thread wanders all over the place. It's less valuable to readers then, and is placed lower in the rankings.
I think you meant, "you can infer to that which I am thinking...probably?"
😉 j/k, I couldn't resist, you left it wide open.
.
Lighten up PepeSee, it will be OK. Think it through. If I did not understand what was meant how could I have offered a suggested fix?
Also, I guess you have not really seen my posts. Sometimes I wonder if I'm being coherent, let alone gramering correctly.
Fine fine perhaps I am just tired of all the corrections.
As far as "wide open" if you are inferring anything's actually wrong there vs just going for a more highfalutin tone, we can go to the whiteboard for diagramming. The only thing I'd say is technically unnecessary/incorrect is the comma after "well."
As for "think it through" like I say the general objection here is how many people (through being bored, autists, dicks, or some combination or whatever) are pointing out typos etc when it just wastes time and space (oh the irony).
Just FYI infer was fine, but not "infer to"
/wordnerd