447
Comments (81)
sorted by:
65
CaptainQirk [S] 65 points ago +65 / -0

Surprise! Brian Kemp and Brad Raffensperger win!

Also posted it on Patriots.win, I'm unsure why there's no traction. They seem uninterested for some odd reason.

Think we can get Trump to Truth about it? Anyone wanna @ any of the folks like Dinesh or Kash or Trump himself?

24
Quixotic 24 points ago +24 / -0

Maybe because a telegram account saying something happened doesnt mean it actually happened

you got a link of them actually releasing it?

If not you’ve got a discernment problem

16
CaptainQirk [S] 16 points ago +16 / -0

Entirely possible. And if I fucked up, I'll take the slings and arrows and be more thoughtful with my posts and wordings in future.

Not sure who would fake an 8 page pdf and not include a larger tally size though, if the intent was to decieve patriots.

Thus I believe that it was pushed out early, and saved before it could change back.

2
Quixotic 2 points ago +10 / -8

What is the source of the pdf? If Georgia released it, it should originate from Georgia.

“Not sure who would fake an 8 pg pdf”

Why not? Are you that naive? Are there not entire branches of government whose sole purpose is to discredit truth especially about election fraud?

Wise up, dude.

8
CaptainQirk [S] 8 points ago +8 / -0

Well that's fair. According to the pdf it originated from a local Georgia MSM site.

But yeah, I guess the header and formatting could be faked.

But if you were gonna fake it, wouldn't you put in a higher tally?

Then again, if they're really trying to discredit us I guess they'd wanna fuck with us like that. Hmm.

0
Quixotic 0 points ago +7 / -7

It has to be believable to be a good deception.

That’s why sourcing is all-important.

My advice to you is stop reading telegram.

Nothing but fake bullshit has ever come from it.

9
CaptainQirk [S] 9 points ago +9 / -0

But that goes for literally any info source. Thus the source isn't the issue but individual discernment.

We still post news articles despite questionable veracity, so I think I'll keep trying to improve my discernment but also keep reading whatever I want to read.

Nothing is more questionable than someone telling you not to read something.

3
DickWax 3 points ago +3 / -0

Unfortunately what Quixotic is explaining is a legitimate concern. The quality of sourcing in this subculture has dramatically declined as the platforms have been systematically targeted.

It used to be the responsibility of the OP to do their own research, or at least link to a source that "baked the bread".

Now the movement is fragmented, making it easier to spread disinformation where people readily spread it due to confirmation bias. Someone probably read that headline and is now telling their friends as if it's fact. That's the state of the movement. We need higher standards.

1
Callmejuls 1 point ago +1 / -0

Amen

-6
Quixotic -6 points ago +5 / -11

You have poor discernment so I am recommending avoiding a platform that is only ever fake. But you go ahead - continue to gave poor discernment.

6
GodBlessTheUSA22 6 points ago +6 / -0

Yes, go for entrainment if you must. If you find something dig until you know it’s valid, then post. But, know this, we all learned this, so if you are new here just know you are in the best place and and anyone saying this is doing it so you have all your ducks in a row when you go out and fight with your information. We are a team and we are here to help each other.

1
Callmejuls 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well, think about it, wasn’t the phony dossier against Trump several pages as wepl???

2
GodBlessTheUSA22 2 points ago +2 / -0

Exactly, I just asked who/where it was released to before I saw your comment. We need sources folks. Without them, it means nothing.

10
Ehjax78 10 points ago +10 / -0

💥💥💥💥There's an article in the Gateway pundit May 16

VoterGA Exposes Local TV Station that Posted Premature Primary Results Before the Upcoming Election

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/05/voterga-exposes-local-tv-station-posted-premature-primary-results-upcoming-election/

4
Hoshi 4 points ago +4 / -0

I see that in the article that some candidates feel they released this to discourage people from voting for certain people assuming they won't win. Of course there will never be standing for election interference with a democrat so they can get away with this shit.

3
ObviousStatementMan 3 points ago +3 / -0

How is everyone on here so quick to forget that this happened numerous times ahead of the 2020 election? Same exact shit. MSM outlets and local media sites were posting vote counts and projected winners over a week before election day. There is precedent here. Can they explain it? Sure. Is that explanation sufficient? No. Keep your vote tally testing private.

Early release of fabricated voting results has a similar impact as Fox News calling Arizona for Biden with 2% of the votes in.

2
GA-Peach-Patriot 2 points ago +2 / -0

Well I would just like to say that although the primary is the 24th, early voting for the primary began this week.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
22
captn_crunch 22 points ago +22 / -0

Is there any way to see the content for those without a Telegram account?

46
lsdQ 46 points ago +46 / -0

Here you go, I put it on catbox for you:

https://files.catbox.moe/caapv4.pdf

17
CaptainQirk [S] 17 points ago +17 / -0

Thanks dude!

10
captn_crunch 10 points ago +10 / -0

Thanks!

Looking over it, this has to be an extremely preliminary report because I would think a lot more than just 360k people would be voting in the primary. Also, as a pede living in Ga, I find it hard to believe the two Rep candidates for my district (Ga-6) with the most campaign contributions with one being Trump-endorsed would fail to even crack 1k votes.

7
CaptainQirk [S] 7 points ago +7 / -0

In all honesty I can't vouch for the veracity, just know it was captured and posted by Jovan Pulitzer on Telegram.

Even if it is preliminary, it's fucking strange that they would be test posting election tallies on the news site especially given Kemp and Raff in there.

5
captn_crunch 5 points ago +5 / -0

I get where you're coming from.

I'd also point out that these screen caps indicate Burt Jones (who is Trump endorsed) as the winner for Lt Gov (the green checkmark) with 61%, but Kemp and Raff leading their races but not confirmed as winners and with less than 50% of the votes.

If there's veracity to these screenshots, then there's a possibility of a run-off

5
GimmeMemes 5 points ago +5 / -0

How can there be any veracity to screen caps of the results for an election that hasn't even happened yet?

2
Canadianguy17 2 points ago +2 / -0

Maybe it has.

3
NOT_ADMIN 3 points ago +3 / -0

hasnt this happened before? Their excuse was that they fill in dummy data to make sure all the tools are working like the loading bar.

1
NOTWOKE 1 point ago +1 / -0

I believe that during the AZ audit the Board of Elections was trying to justify something like this. Or it may have been an excuse for one of the other corrupted states. I’ve recall something like this as well.

2
Drinkaforte 2 points ago +2 / -0

Very surprising to me as well.

1
MakeAmericaWinAgain 1 point ago +1 / -0

Agreed. Especially after the rally in Commerce with his endorsed candidates all there.

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
5
CaptainQirk [S] 5 points ago +5 / -0

Edit: Having trouble with my piece of shit phone. Anyone able to mirror the .pdf somewhere?

Cheers anons

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
CaptainQirk [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Don't think it's possible

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
11
CaptainQirk [S] 11 points ago +11 / -0

Catboxed PDF for y'all, provided by u/IsdQ

https://files.catbox.moe/caapv4.pdf

10
TSearch 10 points ago +10 / -0

What does anyone expect from the two guys who participated in helping hand the Presidency and two Senate seats to the Dems?

9
Miztivin 9 points ago +9 / -0

Theyre going to claim its a test run just like the time they accidently released the counts on live tv XD

6
heebiejeebie 6 points ago +6 / -0

if this isn't a BIG RED PILL for the normies.... makes you wonder how many other elections were pre-determined! how many years has this been going on.... it's time to execute those that participate in this treason!!! how different would our country be if the people's voice had actually been heard for the past few decades????

1
The_Expert 1 point ago +1 / -0

Normies make up excuses for everything. They will believe whatever the news is telling them. The same news network that aired this will have a statement about it and the normies will just point to it and say, "See, it was just polling data, not the final results."

6
TQQDLES 6 points ago +6 / -0

At this point, a question to ask is was this an "accident" or was it someone trying to show proof that they are still committing fraud what with 2000 mules coming out OR could it be the sick stupid way the DS likes to gloat/brag the way they do by dangling the truth in front of the people's faces expecting nothing to happen?

2
Moose_Antlers 2 points ago +2 / -0

Or is it just someone testing the web page tech and published something to the live servers that should've been kept off the publicly accessible page?

You'd use simulated data to test the website functionality.

If you look at the screenshot, there's a URL. I tried it. It is no longer active. My guess is they were testing tech.

6
dildoschwaggins 6 points ago +6 / -0

Wait...this isn't a Bee article?!

6
hothousecreekguy 6 points ago +6 / -0

The FUCKERS are obviously gonna cheat AGAIN!!!!!!!!!

5
BQnita 5 points ago +6 / -1

Ha! Leave it to China!

5
Drinkaforte 5 points ago +5 / -0

I just see no way that Kemp is leading. And no way in hell raffensberger is. He hasn't even campaigned!

1
GA-Peach-Patriot 1 point ago +1 / -0

Trust me, Kemp will win the primary. Sadly, he's got a lot of support in GA.

1
Drinkaforte 1 point ago +1 / -0

I know I live there. It's just unreal to me that either have support, especially brad but Kemp too.

2
GA-Peach-Patriot 2 points ago +2 / -0

I hear ya! Just got home after passing countless Kemp signs...not a single Perdue...SMDH

4
Island_Photo 4 points ago +4 / -0

Sombody be testin their algorithym...

4
NOT_ADMIN 4 points ago +4 / -0

hasnt this happened before? Their excuse was that they fill in dummy data to make sure all the tools are working like the loading bar.

5
CaptainQirk [S] 5 points ago +5 / -0

Seems like a load of bullshit. I can't see a situation like that needing to happen more than once, but even then it sounds like an excuse.

If you were filling in dummy data, you'd use dummy names too.

It's not like they radically change the way websites show the data... Or is it?

4
NOT_ADMIN 4 points ago +4 / -0
  • Website don't show data, you have to create the HTML, CSS, JavaScript, PHP, database, etc for it first.
  • Its likely that the site is setup to fetch data from a database. that would be the smartest solution so that you arent manually entering the data over and over in order to update the page.

  • Now, none of this is provable, I am making assumptions. So don't put too much weight behind its factuality.

  • A likely scenario is that the people working on the graphics side of things are not in control of the database side. The database side of people probably added all the names of who is running and were told to add dummy data. Typically you have multiple teams working on a project where there is both technical and visual expertise needed since most companies arent filled with technical artists (artists who can also program)

2
TennDenise 2 points ago +2 / -0

here we go again............nothing like a little corruption!

1
Mcmurdo32 1 point ago +1 / -0

Could this be a template graphic to be filled in with actual numbers on election night?

1
ACTS1711 1 point ago +1 / -0

I have one thing to say to President Trump and the Military. Fix the damn election. You fool me once shame on you. You fool me 2,3,4,5,6 times shame on me. I'm literally thrown ballots here in California clearly without the water mark. I ain't playing this game anymore looking like an abject fool.

1
Callmejuls 1 point ago +1 / -0

Hmmm, nuttin fishy there!🧐🧐🧐🙄🙄🙄🤯🤯🤯

1
DontTreadOnIT 1 point ago +2 / -1

Source is Jovan Pulitzer, so this is probably disinfo to make us look bad again.

1
DarthLurkusTheWise 1 point ago +1 / -0

Damn it's like that time they announced the third tower early

1
GodBlessTheUSA22 1 point ago +1 / -0

Where/who was it released to?

1
Weneverleft 1 point ago +1 / -0

Jesus H, because of course.

1
Turd_Furgeson 1 point ago +1 / -0

Look at the numbers for attorney general, 1 vote separates the d and r winner for both first and second choice. And there’s a few other spots where the exact same number shows up which I would think to be impossible with so many choices. Real or fake the numbers seem bullshit

1
BWolf79 1 point ago +1 / -0

Is it posted under the "Steals and Deals" section?

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
Highball 1 point ago +1 / -0

a telegram link, don't be such a faggot.

1
TheTroof 1 point ago +1 / -0

Weird. All incumbents winning. It's like, I don't know, they helped create a system that insures they always win.

1
anonleo1579 1 point ago +1 / -0

Force feeding redpills :D

1
Jacurutu99 1 point ago +1 / -0

Whoops!

1
jdqw210 1 point ago +1 / -0

link not working

1
Donny_Fiasco 1 point ago +1 / -0

Cue the Politico article headline ....

"No, Georgia did not mistakenly release election results before the actual election"

1
Wendyrogersismyhero 1 point ago +1 / -0

Cheaters gonna cheat!😐

1
ditzee58 1 point ago +1 / -0

Hope every one of these turds go to GITMO.

0
FEARNOT 0 points ago +1 / -1

The pigs will stand down, again.

0
Heyohyo 0 points ago +1 / -1

This is conspiracy treason

0
ravonaf 0 points ago +1 / -1

Wait what? I was told it was ok to vote again. That my vote would be counted this time. That THIS time would be different. I was ensured that voting in rigged elections would result in a fair outcome. Strange.