For example:
Those are a few off the top of my head. Am I leaving any out? Please leave comments so I can cover all the bases in the coming decode.
All these are symbolic comms. They are examples of a code language that means something different. That's not to say they aren't doing this crazy stuff, but "As above, so below" applies here, so they think it will extra-dimensionally reinforce their agenda if they manifest the esoteric in the exoteric.
To clarify...
Bugs = Listening/Tracking Devices. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=epNptdA4bFA
Eat the bugs, therefore, translates to: "We will put the surveillance devices inside them."
Which is their plan, talked in code, so they can say the more gruesome details out loud without the Herd freaking out.
https://www.bbvaopenmind.com/en/technology/innovation/technology-under-your-skin/
In Sweden, thousands have had microchips inserted into their hands. The chips are designed to speed up users’ daily routines and make their lives more convenient — accessing their homes, offices and gyms is as easy as swiping their hands against digital readers. Chips also can be used to store emergency contact details, social media profiles or e-tickets for events and rail journeys.
The one that's eluded me for a while was the beef comms.
At the moment, I figure "Synthetic Meat" is another way to suggest they are advertising replacing jobs with AI.
In terms of beef...
Cattle are informants. You get meat from cattle that can't produce milk (time-sensitive insider information / info that can translate into investment opportunities) any longer.
What does it mean to replace the Informants with Synthetic versions, milk and meat both?
I think it means replacing informants with AI. With synthetic flesh.
I'll get more into it with the decode. For now, that's what I'm working on. Give me some of your favorite NWO crazy food stories...
It's old, but the whole cholesterol thing with eggs back in the day always bugged (ahem, bothered) me. If it ties into declining fertility statistics, I'll be hornswaggled.
updoot for saying hornswaggled
Good one. I've pondered that as well.
It's a temporal thing, like coffee.
Have you noticed how about every week there is an article saying "Science shows coffee and excess caffeine is bad for you!"
Then the next week, it's "Coffee is good for you, here are 10 reasons why!"
It's temporary comms.
Coffee are the 4am talking points.
What happens if the 4am talking points need to be redacted, as they are having a negative effect on the narrative?
COFFEE BAD!
What happens when the crisis is abated, and now the 4am talking points are reliable again?
COFFEE GOOD!
Redlight / Greenlight.
Same with eggs.
Eggs are retirement funds, 401ks, pensions, etc.
"Nest Eggs"
401k investment groups are sinking!
EGG BAD!
401k investment groups are on the rise!
EGG GOOD!
Back and forth, like waves in the ocean. High tide, low tide.
Get the gist?
Oh, yeah. That's why I brought it up. But the cholesterol egg thing was a multi-year thing. So I thought if your looking for those stories, just keep it in mind. But it was old, early 90's, so maybe not right for your research topic.
No, you're right to bring it up.
Egg-White = Long Term Investment.
Egg-Yolk = Short-Term Investment.
"Egg white cholesterol is better for you!" - Translation: Invest in long-term.
"Egg yolk cholesterol is better for you!" - Translation: Invest in short-term.
Too much bad cholesterol can clog your veins. Like getting caught out when you've over-invested in a naked short.
I found these while searching NWO foods
https://pennybutler.com/tag/nwo-food/
https://thenewamerican.com/world-economic-forum-we-can-be-conditioned-to-eat-weeds-and-bugs-to-save-us-from-climate-change/
Bugs could also mean, things you dont want in your body like viruses, paracites etc. So maybe bugs could mean that you will eat nanobots/or mrna vaccines and be happy that you have something to eat since everything else is burned to the ground.
If it matches the definition, anything can be a bug in proper context.
So, yeah, nanobots, viruses, and mrna vaccines can all be used as bugs.
But the bug-i-ness supersedes the literal means being espoused.
Not every person is a fly, but a person can act as a fly if they hover around your shoulders watching what you are doing and driving you nuts.
It's is reinforced with the common idiom; "You're bugging me!" -- means being annoying and not leaving someone alone, often with malicious intent.
What about the water making the frogs gay?
Anons are frogs. Pepe was not a mistake. They HATE frogs as much as they do Pepe.
They morph from swimming (information) tadpoles onto land (fact and legal) and move quickly through the air (person-to-person communication / talk) by making "leaps in logic."
What does it mean to turn someone gay?
https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/gay
Alex Jones is Controlled Opposition, this has been made clear time and time again.
He was genuinely upset they were turning the frogs gay (turning frogs into activists) because it was making his job of corralling them like the Pied Piper that much harder.
The activists definition is a little atypical on this one, though; activists are usually horses. But frogs CAN race too, as Mark Twain shows:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Celebrated_Jumping_Frog_of_Calaveras_County
I highly suggest reading his story. It plays into comms around frogs, well and truly. Jim in the story was a betting man, and thought he had a sure scheme when he trained a sick-looking frog to jump far, catching many he bet against off guard. A stranger came along and told him Jim can go get him a frog to race with. Eager to pick a lousy frog, Jim accepted and while he was away the stranger shoved lead bird shot down Jim's frog's throat, making him too heavy to jump. The Stranger, effectively, cheated to teach Jim a lesson about how "sure bets" are never sure. Remind you of a certain election in 2016?
Mark Twain was/is a Patriot. Trump took a play out of his book when he ran against Hillary in 2016. He shoved bird shot down her throat, by getting Russia to unrig the election. Hillary couldn't point out his deal with Russia, because she and her cronies had made the same illicit deals for decades. He gave her a lesson about how "sure bets" are never sure.
Good times!
Anyway, back to gay frogs.
Best I can tell, gay frogs were an attempt to control opposition the Independent Creators on YouTube, Facebook, Twitter, Twitch, etc...
The gay frogs backfired when it became clear it was actively propping up people who were uncontrollable. Alex Jones, therefore, proven right in his assessment of their shotgun blast to the foot being a bad idea.
Their plan to corral the frogs turned into a biblical plague, with frogs coming out of the sky, left-right-and center. They empowered us by putting a light on the conspiracy crowd. No matter how much they try to stigmatize conspiracy theorists, It only draws more to their conspiracies.
Their remedy for the horrible plot gone awry? Censorship. That's your first clue they are losing. Hard.
We are the frogs descending from the sky during the Exodus. Pharaoh cannot get rid of us fast enough.
Just now getting back to this. Very good - I like it!
Here's one I found, for later reference:
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/vegetarian-diet-bad-for-environment-meat-study-lettuce-three-times-worse-emissions-bacon-a6773671.html