211
Comments (42)
sorted by:
11
escapefromearth 11 points ago +11 / -0

This person is about to get the biggest red pill of their life watching the truth play out in court.

4
Cpleb 4 points ago +4 / -0

I have a feeling she may be too slow to follow what’s going on.

10
7ate9 10 points ago +10 / -0

That's good. It will mean even more as the truth unfolds and the guilty verdict comes down.

3
bubble_bursts [S] 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yep, this is what I feel too

9
sourcesPlease 9 points ago +11 / -2

So what?

Would the trial only be fair if every juror loved Trump, or was indifferent to him?

SMH…

16
bubble_bursts [S] 16 points ago +16 / -0

Passing on info fren, no judgement. I think this works in our favour. When someone reads a potential MSM article saying the trial is rigged in Trump's favour, Anons will have the ammunition.

2
sourcesPlease 2 points ago +4 / -2

👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻

2
NewWorldOnions 2 points ago +2 / -0

“And of course, she is on the jury” sounds like judgment to me lol.

Fair point regardless.

5
NorthOfFrosty 5 points ago +5 / -0

You dont honestly think a full slate of HRC supporter jurors would convict anyone associated to her do you?

They are supposed to be vetted for impartiality.

2
amarQ144 2 points ago +2 / -0

I like it. We could go ahead and hang the guy and worry about try'n him later.

7
Cyberhawk 7 points ago +7 / -0

We’ve said for awhile, when “their side” wakes up, finally, they are gonna tear this place apart. So in reality, having zombies on the jury is a hopeful chance. I don’t think Durham would have moved forwards unless he has it all. And the kind of evidence we’re talking here should scare the average citizen, no matter what party your aligned with.

3
Hellann 3 points ago +3 / -0

I've been watching some reaction videos on YouTube lately. There was one posted 10 days ago.. 10. It was the first he had heard about the racism of planned parenthood and their real reason for being in black neighborhoods. A grown azz 40+ year old man. He was shook. He had been told all his life they were good. "Get your birth control, get your birth control". His was not the only video I saw where they are getting slowly redpilled. Within the last month. Thomas Sowell, etc. That's just one subject. And people are still learning and waking up. It feels like it's taking forever, but it's happening.

2
bubble_bursts [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

We'll put fren

3
Bedminster 3 points ago +3 / -0

I almost feel that this trial is a setup for the military to run tribunals. Prove that the judicial is 100% compromised and them bring in the military. Not sure just a thought.

3
bubble_bursts [S] 3 points ago +3 / -0

I have a different thought. This case is such a slam dunk that Durham is flexing. He will convict their boy in their own backyard with their own biased jurors and still do it without breaking a sweat.

What will others do after that?

2
Nolagirl99 2 points ago +2 / -0

I think it’s a slam dunk, so he doesn’t have to worry about a tainted jury. Suss will probably wind up making a deal and flipping on the higher ups. As for the judge, he said he would recuse himself and Durham was fine with him being the judge. From the rulings I’ve read, he’s been more than fair. The accidental release of the emails could’ve been really bad for the prosecution. I found it interesting a bigger deal wasn’t made by the judge or the defense. Just one lawfags thoughts

1
bubble_bursts [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeah, I get a feeling that this particular case is a much more complex piece in the 5D chess game than we think. I personally believe it serves two purposes;

  • Introducing evidence for other trials

  • Flexing against the Cabal, showing how nothing can stop what is coming.

The second aspect is far more important in the Elite world than people appreciate.

2
Nolagirl99 2 points ago +2 / -0

I agree. Some of the emails were kept from being introduced bc sussman wasn’t charged with conspiracy. Once he’s convicted, it opens the door to charge others with conspiracy.

2
bubble_bursts [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yep this is definitely the play here

2
Bedminster 2 points ago +2 / -0

Let's hope that's the case. If it is it's almost like he's putting the judicial system on trial as well. Slam dunk case with irrefutable evidence and testimony and dare them to not convict him.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
3
The-Amazing-Rando 3 points ago +3 / -0

If it all turns out bad, it is just another avenue proving that tribunals are needed. At this point, there is about no avenues left.

3
bubble_bursts [S] 3 points ago +3 / -0

Nah, a lot of declas will start happening in regular courts. Remember, its not about Sussman, its about introducing evidence, and getting access to evidence, an Durham opened the doors on that already.

3
Perrin 3 points ago +3 / -0

Remember this is not a murder trial and does not require a unanimous decision

1
bubble_bursts [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ah I forgot that

1
7ate9 1 point ago +1 / -0

What does it require? TY

1
Perrin 1 point ago +1 / -0

Idk that unfortunately

3
polish_snausage 3 points ago +3 / -0

It's in DC, they all do.

DC is separate from the US.

2
HoppyHap 2 points ago +2 / -0

I would personally say I do not like Trump to increase my chances of getting on the jury. Play the game to win!

1
bubble_bursts [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Lol yeah

2
Mightyspark2022 2 points ago +2 / -0

It sounds to me like this potential juror already made up his/her mind! Everything has to do with team Trumps and real patriots. They don’t like anything that stands with Trump so…..won’t be able to use logic and will use only emotion

2
bubble_bursts [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

Like others commented here, I think we will see her getting massively redpilled. Remember, these folks stay ignorant because the mainstream malnourishes them of real information. In a court-room their hungry soul will suck up all the information that comes their way.

2
Mightyspark2022 2 points ago +2 / -0

I hope you are correct and hope something happens to the real criminals

2
Suidlander 2 points ago +2 / -0

It is pretty safe to say in DC metro there aren't any Trump supporters, so evidence presentation & cross examination of defense witnesses must drop the jurors jaws

1
bubble_bursts [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Right, this is DC. I was kinda curious how come so many political donors in the jury pool. Okay, so the fact this is being filed in DC is definitely relevant. I know Q had mentioned that many of the cases will not be filed in DC. I guess this is a slam dunk + redpill all bundled in one.

1
ImaSueDeNym 1 point ago +1 / -0

There is a massive amount of military personnel in the DC region. From what I've seen, living here the past 17+ years, the majority of the military tend to be conservative. Most of the military families I know love Trump.

2
Citizen17Soldier 2 points ago +2 / -0

If it doesn't turn out OK for our side, then this is good justification for calling it a mistrial (?)

2
Halya 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'm more concerned about the biased judge.

1
bubble_bursts [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Its okay, a biased judge, biased jury and the entire DS cannot stop this train right in the middle of DC - they stronghold.

2
Perrin 2 points ago +2 / -0

Fuck that bitch

2
bubble_bursts [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

I mean, Good knows what diseases she had