Wait. This just in. An anonymous bystander reports that Senator Ron Johnson exposed himself to a barrista and offered to buy her a horse if she went in the bathroom with him.
Which he proceeded to then stuff himself inside and duffel bag and yeet himself off a bridge. His death has been ruled as a suicide. His family has declined on making any comments.
The public has been given a select taste (i.e. sampling) - rest assured others have it all (100% verifiable and impossible to refute).
Why is this relevant?
Who controls the narrative?
Why are left wing organizations beginning to report on DNC/D corruption?
Does the CIA have operators inside the MSM?
What happens if exposed?
What happens if tied back as 'knowing' to execs?
What does this have to do with 'leaking'?
What if it can be verified no sourced stories (made up) were in fact (and approved) to be published?
The wormhole goes deep.
So if news media can be proven to be complicit, actively working to get Hillary elected (really "anyone but Trump" in their words) - do they then lose their 1st amendment protections as they are no longer operating as journalists but rather corrupt politicians? And should they then be prosecuted similarly?
Wait. This just in. An anonymous bystander reports that Senator Ron Johnson exposed himself to a barrista and offered to buy her a horse if she went in the bathroom with him.
Breaking breaking: Ron Johnson has killed himself. He was found dead with multiple gunshot wounds to the back of his head.
Which he proceeded to then stuff himself inside and duffel bag and yeet himself off a bridge. His death has been ruled as a suicide. His family has declined on making any comments.
The public has been given a select taste (i.e. sampling) - rest assured others have it all (100% verifiable and impossible to refute). Why is this relevant? Who controls the narrative? Why are left wing organizations beginning to report on DNC/D corruption? Does the CIA have operators inside the MSM? What happens if exposed? What happens if tied back as 'knowing' to execs? What does this have to do with 'leaking'? What if it can be verified no sourced stories (made up) were in fact (and approved) to be published? The wormhole goes deep.
sadly.... a bunch of people won't believe that she could be corrupt!
So if news media can be proven to be complicit, actively working to get Hillary elected (really "anyone but Trump" in their words) - do they then lose their 1st amendment protections as they are no longer operating as journalists but rather corrupt politicians? And should they then be prosecuted similarly?
Wait..was it a STERN warning..!
Aww forshizzle, it’s getting real! Ron calm down!