Ok, just for you, I'll repost my opening comment. Here it is.
I'm so perplexed that many Americans feel that they cannot support any reasonable restriction on gun ownership. "Shall not be infringed," they repeat endlessly as if that's the whole amendment. They chop off the whole first half that specifies the main reason to have firearms. They don't like, or don't understand, the mention of a militia so they pretend that part was never written.
Are we actually advocating for no restrictions whatsoever? Teenagers with a serious SSRI problem and murderous fantasies, violent criminals, foreign terrorists, we support all of them having unlimited firepower? Seriously. I want to know what our position should be as constitutional conservatives.
Ok, just for you, I'll repost my opening comment. Here it is.
I'm so perplexed that many Americans feel that they cannot support any reasonable restriction on gun ownership. "Shall not be infringed," they repeat endlessly as if that's the whole amendment. They chop off the whole first half that specifies the main reason to have firearms. They don't like, or don't understand, the mention of a militia so they pretend that part was never written.
Are we actually advocating for no restrictions whatsoever? Teenagers with a serious SSRI problem and murderous fantasies, violent criminals, foreign terrorists, we support all of them having unlimited firepower? Seriously. I want to know what our position should be as constitutional conservatives.