From the NIH home page … in the search bar at the top right … type “Covid Update truth”.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (86)
sorted by:
But they allowed it to be published. These journals will 100% reject you if they don't agree with your political opinion. On top of that the NIH host it on their own website. That's two levels of gate keeping.
That website is essentially a research paper aggregator... think of it as a search engine on nih. It's not nih's actual views
Hmm the only comment that summarizes the situation accurately has three downvotes and is buried, while the mis-titled OP is stickied.
Guess everyone is still high on weekend hopium. People, there is no need for hopium any more. Reality is sufficient. Title your posts accurately.
It's a great article either way. Just can't say it's NIH's statement.
Yeah pretty much the usual situation around here. Nobody really cares what the facts are as long as it doesn't mean they were wrong.
It's okay. I hate the NIH as much as everyone else and personally wish that statement was reflective of what the NIH said so that I can spread the link like crazy to all the msm-zombies around me.
But I have a friend in public health who is frequently trying to convince me to get the jab and i know his response about this link would be that the website is just a research aggregator.
It's a really awesome aggregator as well - there's a TON of good info and sound research stored on that site.
IMHO, this is by design and is the same process used by the media to cover their asses when reviewed in retrospect. Remember how the media did everything said in this article, but drip drip dripped out the facts afterwards? They can cover their karma and their ass to say that we told you those facts, once the viewpoint solidifies in the mainstream.
These institutional leaders and their lackeys need to be put on trial and if found guilty, taking out in the most heinous way possible. This is a twofer, to strike back in suck a fashion that all of history will remember and start the healing. People will not trust any of these institutions again. I know that I dont. I have needed an elective surgery for a few years now, I refuse, I will suffer before stepping into the killing fields. I know I am not alone and that is sad.
Remember deagle population chart along with agenda 2030, this isnt over and people need to be aware and stand up to tyranny. We need to get all groups together to unite against the government and tyranny.
And the damage to the normies is already done. Like how many of the bullshit Ukraine stories like "Snake Island" and "Ghost of Kiev" were retracted after a couple days but months later there are still NPCs going on claiming them to be real.
I don't discount anything that you point out, and it is a step in the right direction.
I applaud Blaylock for his courage and conviction to pen this truth to his name, as he is but one sunshine soldier in a stormy sea of deceit.
My point is, this is not NIH admitting fuckery. More like NIH trying to get out in front of the realization many are waking to what we already know, which is also a good thing.
It's happened before on the NIH website. Someone published an article on how the masks are bogus and it was "debunked" and removed from the website. Anytime someone speaks the truth on there it gets shot down.
Guy opens back door to the ministry of truth.... Psst look at this...
Will be interested to follow-up on, as anyone can counter or add information. This really was brave of him
I know, that's what I was referring to. Hence two levels of gate keeping; the journal and the NIH aggregation database.
That's exactly what I'm saying. It's almost unbelievable that it got through. Usually I would expect this sort of thing to be outright rejected.