WHEN READING THE POSTED INFO UNDERNEATH KEEP THE FOLLOWING IN MIND:
I HAVE NO THEORY = as you can see I researched, found and did COPY-PASTA-POSTING for discussion.
Then the mods made a stickie REALLY QUICK with a flair. Without the mods I wouldn't have had any 15 upvotes and it would be o.k. for me.
Instead of discussion, a lot quick reactions came up WITHOUT ANY READING OF THE LINKS!
TO ALL: ASK THE MODS WHY THEY STICKIED MY POST WITH THAT FLAIR!
Edit: O.K. it seems some appreciate the findings to dig deeper - thank you!
"How Scientology Got 5,000 Secret Agents in the Government" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GgZyjR2SOuE
The Most Successful Infiltration Of The US Government Was Pulled Off By The Church Of Scientology:
"Forget Communists, Russians, and lizard people - nobody has launched a greater espionage mission within US borders than the Church of Scientology. They might not have entirely gotten away with it, but it's hard to argue Operation Snow White was anything but a resounding victory - and a major reason why the church remains powerful to this day.
Operation Snow White Began In The '70s After The Church Lost Its Tax-Exempt Status
A number of legal issues for both L. Ron Hubbard and the Church of Scientology prompted the development of Operation Snow White in 1973. The most direct cause was the IRS's decision to revoke Scientology's tax-exempt status six years earlier, which the church didn't want to accept.
The IRS had said it "proved conclusively that the church was operated for the benefit of L. Ron Hubbard and his family."
The Goal Was To Get Rid Of Negative Reports On Scientology
Hubbard fervently denied the FBI's findings that the church operated for his benefit and continued to refuse orders to pay taxes. To change the US government's view of Scientology as a "dissident group," L. Ron Hubbard and the church set out to "purge unfavorable records" of allegedly false reports the intelligence community had collected about the organization.
Operation Snow White began innocently - if perhaps dishonestly - enough, but it soon devolved into what some called an outright conspiracy against the US government. ..."
https://www.ranker.com/list/story-of-operation-snow-white/stephanroget
for more research on Scientology perhaps go here: https://www.xenu.net/
or here: https://vault.fbi.gov/church-of-scientology
Clinton, China & Scientology:
" This article will present a case that the Clinton administration is a front for the Church of Scientology. This is an exercise in investigative journalism published here in alt.religion.scientology. I don't want a career in journalism I just want to live in a free country. If you agree with the facts and concepts I will reveal to you please get in touch with Congressman Bob Barr or Senator Don Nichols who is presiding over the Senate Finance IRS Oversight subcommittee.
A clear planet is a planet governed by Scientology. SCIENTOLOGY IS THE VEHICLE OF THE BEAST. They are closer to achieving this goal than you may expect.
With all of Clinton's dodgy relationships being brought out into the light, why hasn't anyone thoroughly investigated his unabashed endorsements of Scientology? Because they don't know what Scientology is and they haven't asked the million dollar question: is Bill Clinton a practicing Scientologist?
That is the missing link between this administration's actions and motives. We know much of what this administration has done, where they've done it, to whom and when etc. But nobody has really asked "why." Why has this President single-handedly disgraced the office and bastardized it with such flagrant disregard for morals and dignity? Why does this administration so viciously attack its critics? Why does this President hold himself above the law?
The Clinton administration MO regarding suppressive persons is exactly the same as Scientology's MO... attack the attacker, investigate the investigator. Look what the White House is doing to Ken Starr, and what they've done to Linda Tripp. Both of them are being investigated. (James Carville -- nuff said) What about Filegate? This whole administration smacks of Scientology. ..."
https://members.tripod.com/cic_ops/cescah.htm
Is this Operation Snow White connected to Jeffrey Epstein?
"Jes Staley — the former CEO of Barclays who resigned last week following an investigation into his ties to late pedophile Jeffrey Epstein — reportedly exchanged some 1,200 emails with the perverted moneyman over a four-year period.
Some of those emails included mysterious terms such as “snow white” that have yet to be explained, the Financial Times reported, citing people familiar with the correspondence between Staley and Epstein. Epstein killed himself in 2019."
Which Q-Posts refer to "Snow White"?
All credits to Robistro for this link: https://qalerts.net/?q=%7Csnow+white%7C
LOL - a downvote for this.
My post seems to have triggered some and the stickie some more - very interesting. And until now no comment on the content of the links only quick superficial reactions - hmmm?
Because everyone but you recognize in the scheme of things Scientology is a small group in comparison to others. In a post you should persuasively argue your point and present the facts. If people are interested they read follow your sources, etc.
You are arguing a point ands telling us your are correct because of your links. I don't think anyone disagrees that scientology and our government have connections. Where there is money there is corruption and control.
However in the scheme of things, I still would argue that Freemasonry and Fake Judaism are much larger fish to fry than what you posted. The way I view it is that there is a cabal that's organized and it reveals itself in many forms (high ranking Mormonism, freemasonry, scientology, CFR, etc.) Scientology is not a cause of the cabal or the illuminati but a form/offshoot of it.
Scientology is bad. Groups are more connected than we realize but I disagree with your premise.
Honestly part of me thinks you aren't being genuine. On the one hand you present a theory for discussion and you say you have no theory (as in you present a point for discussion according to a theory you do not personally hold) yet you react heavily when people reject the idea you post. That is a discussion. Don't ask us to do the heavy lifting, it is on you to post a discussion subject and summarize it to create interest.
If you want more engagement then next time provide more bread crumbs and create interest. There are plenty of theories out there and posts to ponder on GAW. Why should we care so much about yours when it completely flies in the face of the idea of the cabal or illuminati that most people believe to be true and is backed up by lots of sources.
I agree with many point of yours.
BUT FACT IS: I COPY-PASTA-POSTED IT = Therefore I do NOT argue, but the headline is the headline of one of the articles.
You and all the other comments never clicked the links to realize that quickly.
I apologize if I came off harsh earlier. I responded right after I woke up and typed it up in a rush.
Thanks for finding and posting new sauce. I think if you shared more context and explained better where you were coming from people would be more receptive. I interpreted it as this is not a theory but read it and believe it which forces us to have to read it just to engage in a dialogue. Since I have to prioritize my time, you end up getting a superficial response from me and others. Maybe frame it as "I found this and not sure what I think of it so could we have an open discussion, as a group, with no agenda." People want to find truth and don't mind reading but it is in how you frame it.
All is good, fren. I was not feeling well the last days and could offer only the links I stumbled upon, without going deeper myself, but thinking it might be interesting for some.
You are right, I could have explained it above more clearly, but I did not thought that it would gain so much attraction = a stickie. Thank you, for your feedback.