I came across this discussion on this topic. I'm leaning towards the "It was real" camp after reading this and other things lately. The writers of this are based and know about the Kazar Darwinian cover up of true history.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (22)
sorted by:
Generally these things aren't "myths." They're more likely to be a reality that is presented out of context. Think human nature - people don't just keep a myth going over hundreds of years without some sort of influence to do so or belief that the myth is a reality.
It was probably real and was probably different than what we think of it as being. Just as a lot of the mythology of the past was probably based off reality, but details were incorrect (fallen angels vs god's, etc.)