When they tell him how many bots there are he would get it for at least half what he offered first ( I think it was $30B ) Not buying what they are selling here.
A US senator earns an annual salary of $174K. But the value of a senator is not their monetary output (or free cash flow using investment terms); instead it's the strategic ability to affect the value of anything else. Owning the Senate is worth more than the income stream of its members.
Putting a valuation on Twitter is like pricing the Senate: the value is strategic, not monetary. Like it or not, Twitter has captured the public square (or at least a big chunk of it), and taking it back can't be measured in money.
Ideally the government would have been a good steward of public resources, to ensure multiple platforms so that anybody could have a voice. But instead the government has sold out its citizens and encouraged monopolies everywhere: from the airwaves to cellular service to the fiber optic cables to cyber-storage, facilitating the stifling and denial of free expression anywhere. Q has indicated these will be taken back to become publicly regulated utilities to serve the public instead of herd it, but it has to start somewhere. This is it, and it's worth it.
I agree: buying back what was stolen feels wrong, but I think it's the expedient move, as a stepping stone to get us where we need to be.
A competing platform could easily succeed, IF it were supported by AWS, Verizon, Cisco, Goog, ABC, etc. But they aren't going to let that happen. It would be like introducing a new Myspace: no matter how good it is, you'll still be better off buying Facebook if you can.
That's what I meant by "like it or not:" it's just the lay of the land today. My point is that the value can't be determined by a monetary valuation.
I think the plan involves Twitter (and fb) either destroying itself or getting acquired by TMTG, and the people currently controlling Twitter will pay for their crimes after they are discovered, which will claw back the payments. But I don't know that, I'm just trusting the plan.
Soooo buy as much $DWACW/$DWAC as possible and one share of Twat to class action lawsuit the board into oblivion when it goes bankrupt due to so many bots and being a govt funded/inflated fraudulent entity . Got it.
Sorry; didn't mean to be dismissive. I guess we'll find out. The cabal invested a lot in this trophy property. I'm happy to see it taken away. Hopefully it's a keystone property that will collapse the big tech oligarchy into pieces for a new start.
Whether it's worth the money or not is another question. As a congressman once said, a billion here, a few billion there, pretty soon you're talking real money.
Not going to happen, as it's currently structured and priced. The board wants it done quickly so that no body looks into the 🤖 issue. Elon might buy them for a discount once the truth comes out, but I personally doubt that it will happen at all. Twitter has to make it through advertiser, user and investor lawsuits, then the SEC, before this deal goes forward.
When they tell him how many bots there are he would get it for at least half what he offered first ( I think it was $30B ) Not buying what they are selling here.
Now that its mkt cap is only $29 Billion I'm sure it was a very easy decision for them.....run from it Elon!!!!!
A US senator earns an annual salary of $174K. But the value of a senator is not their monetary output (or free cash flow using investment terms); instead it's the strategic ability to affect the value of anything else. Owning the Senate is worth more than the income stream of its members.
Putting a valuation on Twitter is like pricing the Senate: the value is strategic, not monetary. Like it or not, Twitter has captured the public square (or at least a big chunk of it), and taking it back can't be measured in money.
Ideally the government would have been a good steward of public resources, to ensure multiple platforms so that anybody could have a voice. But instead the government has sold out its citizens and encouraged monopolies everywhere: from the airwaves to cellular service to the fiber optic cables to cyber-storage, facilitating the stifling and denial of free expression anywhere. Q has indicated these will be taken back to become publicly regulated utilities to serve the public instead of herd it, but it has to start somewhere. This is it, and it's worth it.
I agree: buying back what was stolen feels wrong, but I think it's the expedient move, as a stepping stone to get us where we need to be.
A competing platform could easily succeed, IF it were supported by AWS, Verizon, Cisco, Goog, ABC, etc. But they aren't going to let that happen. It would be like introducing a new Myspace: no matter how good it is, you'll still be better off buying Facebook if you can.
That's what I meant by "like it or not:" it's just the lay of the land today. My point is that the value can't be determined by a monetary valuation.
I think the plan involves Twitter (and fb) either destroying itself or getting acquired by TMTG, and the people currently controlling Twitter will pay for their crimes after they are discovered, which will claw back the payments. But I don't know that, I'm just trusting the plan.
Soooo buy as much $DWACW/$DWAC as possible and one share of Twat to class action lawsuit the board into oblivion when it goes bankrupt due to so many bots and being a govt funded/inflated fraudulent entity . Got it.
You mean, like DARPA?
Pretending FB won the market honestly is like saying that Russia is winning in Ukraine because of its effective community outreach program.
Sorry; didn't mean to be dismissive. I guess we'll find out. The cabal invested a lot in this trophy property. I'm happy to see it taken away. Hopefully it's a keystone property that will collapse the big tech oligarchy into pieces for a new start.
Whether it's worth the money or not is another question. As a congressman once said, a billion here, a few billion there, pretty soon you're talking real money.
This article is lol.....sure Elon we approve, its all good sir.
Source
Thought SEC was looking into the purchase and that Musk wanted a full report on the bots.
Now the fun begins.
Not going to happen, as it's currently structured and priced. The board wants it done quickly so that no body looks into the 🤖 issue. Elon might buy them for a discount once the truth comes out, but I personally doubt that it will happen at all. Twitter has to make it through advertiser, user and investor lawsuits, then the SEC, before this deal goes forward.
Twitter to Elon:
Hey look me over, lend me an ear,
Fresh out of clover and mortgaged up to here,
But, don’t pass the plate folks, don’t pass the cup,
I figure whenever you’re down and out,
The only way is up…
And I’ll be up like a rose bud, high on the vine,
Don’t thumb your nose, Musk, but, take a tip from mine,
I’m a little bit short of the elbow room,
But let me get me some, and look out world, here I come.