And the Democrats and their stupid one-sided J6 Committee, which has openly and publicly bragged it was specially formulated and designed to prevent Donald from from ever running for or holding a political office ever again, now appear to have walked into a trap...
And it was William Barr who did most of these FCC political broadcasting revisions...
... even Rachel Maddow - RACHEL…MADDOW! - had to admit on the air that Donald Trump was still speaking at the Ellipse on the National Mall when the assault on the Capitol Building began.
That is how you know that the people who went in to the Capitol when President Trump's speech was due to be finished were not real Trump fans. If they were, they would know that Trump never starts his speeches on time!
"When it’s proven that TV networks and online news services defamed Trump and others by selectively editing or removing or restricting access to content, they are directly engaging in editorial conduct. It’s acting as a biased gatekeeper. Legally, that media entity loses its limited liability shield under the law and is then open to being civilly sued for damages and/or equal time.
But who will prove that there was defamation, selective editing, etc? They'll hire some corrupt DC asshole to prove this and they will say everything was on the up and up and faithfully represented.
There is a case for defamation and evidence tampering, but could there be a case for aiding an insurrection/sedition? They created and spread propaganda to help the Democrats steal an election..
I can't wait for justice to come, it's anyone's guess as to what these criminals will be convicted for..
Okay so what does this mean for somebody who's a little slow today kek. Does he wanna meet with them and talk to the committee? Or does he wanna be put on the stand as a citizen and then we get "how do you introduce evidence legally?..." in that way? Just spit balling here
Boy that would glue me to my seat for awhile! I can only hope JA gets his time to speak, because he knows some shit and has seen some shit. I would say I can't imagine, but at this point in the great awakening, I think I have an idea of what he may know
And I can't wait to see what Teflon Don has to say 😁 hopefully some more trolling as well as some booms. Who knows, but lately it feels like the wind shifted in our favor.... Maybe it's just me
If the J6 folks thought for a second they would smear DJT and all of us without all of us having a say in the matter, they are badly mistaken.
Our say will not be limited to some speech in front of assholes who've already made up their minds. Our say will come when we throw those idiots out on their asses or into a deep dark jail cell.
This is a larp. Don't fall for it. Use your heads here.
Do we not have a clue whatsoever how laws get passed and regulations get put into place? The "changes in red" were proposed legislative changes the DOJ(Barr) was recommending to Congress to enact. Pretty certain Congress enacted no such legislative changes. The register link to FCC regulations does not implement anything to do with section 230. Reading the EO, it directs the development of regulations to reflect this EO, but it does not appear any such regulations were ever proposed and put up for even a comment period in the register. We don't magically get regulations by EO, it violates the administrative procedures act.
All of these have to do with paid advertising. The law has not changed, it has always required that licensees sell "reasonable" amounts of advertising to qualified candidates at the lowest tier. Which is why you see all of the record keeping requirements for political things. This is so the rates charged can be reviewed.
The idea that televising a Congressional hearing, no matter how absurd the premise of the hearing, is going to constitute "political advertising" is crazy. Everyone in this place is capable of substantially higher level critical thinking than this. Every.Single.One.Of.You. I've seen it. Which is why I come here.
Section 230 will never have any impact on congressional speech. Regardless of whether the committee was formed against the rules of the house, it will NOT change that speech covered by the constitutional speech and debate clause receives ABSOLUTE immunity. Period.
New FCC regulations took effect this March...
And the Democrats and their stupid one-sided J6 Committee, which has openly and publicly bragged it was specially formulated and designed to prevent Donald from from ever running for or holding a political office ever again, now appear to have walked into a trap...
And it was William Barr who did most of these FCC political broadcasting revisions...
SURPRISE!....(Brian Cates)
https://briancates.substack.com/p/donald-trump-has-demanded-equal-time
That is a VERY interesting read. Thanks for sharing.
I liked this part in the Brian Cates link:
That is how you know that the people who went in to the Capitol when President Trump's speech was due to be finished were not real Trump fans. If they were, they would know that Trump never starts his speeches on time!
Not may....MUST. It's the law. And any network failing to give him time up to the second will be heavily fined or punished.
Correct...They have no choice...
"When it’s proven that TV networks and online news services defamed Trump and others by selectively editing or removing or restricting access to content, they are directly engaging in editorial conduct. It’s acting as a biased gatekeeper. Legally, that media entity loses its limited liability shield under the law and is then open to being civilly sued for damages and/or equal time.
But who will prove that there was defamation, selective editing, etc? They'll hire some corrupt DC asshole to prove this and they will say everything was on the up and up and faithfully represented.
but then come the suits...it's either / or and might I add brilliant as a mid or possibly Endgame
There is a case for defamation and evidence tampering, but could there be a case for aiding an insurrection/sedition? They created and spread propaganda to help the Democrats steal an election..
I can't wait for justice to come, it's anyone's guess as to what these criminals will be convicted for..
More importantly, what jury can they assemble, who will look at the evidence with unbiased eyes?
Okay so what does this mean for somebody who's a little slow today kek. Does he wanna meet with them and talk to the committee? Or does he wanna be put on the stand as a citizen and then we get "how do you introduce evidence legally?..." in that way? Just spit balling here
enter julian assange stage right ...... i think he has an interesting story to tell and i bet folks WILL WATCH
Boy that would glue me to my seat for awhile! I can only hope JA gets his time to speak, because he knows some shit and has seen some shit. I would say I can't imagine, but at this point in the great awakening, I think I have an idea of what he may know
oh yeah ...... and then some!!!! getting near another anniversary of the murder of seth rich
Say his name Hillary.....
It means Trump could pay to air 2000 Mules on network TV if he so desired, along with any statements he wishes to make to a national audience.
Oof.... I smell panic in DC kek
He get's the same airtime the demoncrats got.
And I can't wait to see what Teflon Don has to say 😁 hopefully some more trolling as well as some booms. Who knows, but lately it feels like the wind shifted in our favor.... Maybe it's just me
GEOTUS wants the same EQUAL TV time. get the masses and not just US......Imagine
Oh I'm imagining.... And now I have a freedom boner. Thanks
I think he wants his time to speak...If 'they' dare let him...😉
Oooooo that's dasting 😁
Trump is going to get his Mr. Smith moment. Hope he can blow the top off the election, Congress, and the NWO for all the world to see.
If the J6 folks thought for a second they would smear DJT and all of us without all of us having a say in the matter, they are badly mistaken.
Our say will not be limited to some speech in front of assholes who've already made up their minds. Our say will come when we throw those idiots out on their asses or into a deep dark jail cell.
Is this the “we’re gonna do something that has never been done before” that Trump has been talking about?
MAY HAVE TOOOO????? nation of LAWS? to the lawlessones?
Sigh ! Here's hoping !
This is a larp. Don't fall for it. Use your heads here.
Do we not have a clue whatsoever how laws get passed and regulations get put into place? The "changes in red" were proposed legislative changes the DOJ(Barr) was recommending to Congress to enact. Pretty certain Congress enacted no such legislative changes. The register link to FCC regulations does not implement anything to do with section 230. Reading the EO, it directs the development of regulations to reflect this EO, but it does not appear any such regulations were ever proposed and put up for even a comment period in the register. We don't magically get regulations by EO, it violates the administrative procedures act.
All of these have to do with paid advertising. The law has not changed, it has always required that licensees sell "reasonable" amounts of advertising to qualified candidates at the lowest tier. Which is why you see all of the record keeping requirements for political things. This is so the rates charged can be reviewed.
The idea that televising a Congressional hearing, no matter how absurd the premise of the hearing, is going to constitute "political advertising" is crazy. Everyone in this place is capable of substantially higher level critical thinking than this. Every.Single.One.Of.You. I've seen it. Which is why I come here.
Section 230 will never have any impact on congressional speech. Regardless of whether the committee was formed against the rules of the house, it will NOT change that speech covered by the constitutional speech and debate clause receives ABSOLUTE immunity. Period.
read all of your posts and there is noone SMARTER than you!!! Gett it??? NO ONE