We have something similar happening the Canada Day weekend (maybe) in Ottawa. A lot of us suspect a huge False Flag/Media creation/Government shenanigan to occur in order to counter the events with the ultra-Canadian-patriot James Topp. He, and other ex-military/vets are combining with civilians to push information awareness of government abuse and hopefully cause mandate-bullshit ceasing. The MSM has ignored him until just recently, but they are desperately trying to play catch-up and change their stance on the narrative to try and take back control, the dumbasses.
The Public is a tidal wave of narrative-countering now. The government is desperate to take back control. EXCELLENT!
The PEOPLE (general public) questioning the NARRATIVE forces the MSM to “adjust” and “alter” the NARRATIVE in an attempt to recapture control. After a point this pressure becomes so great that the PUBLIC is writing the NARRATIVE.
Loss of NARRATIVE CONTROL (generalized information) means MSM must “change” the subject (expend ammunition) to make a new NARRATIVE before the public becomes too skeptical of the former Narrative.
i.e Ulvade GUN CONTROL narrative is falling apart. Conspiracy theorists and PUBLIC are picking too many holes. They can’t come up with enough “excuses” for all the plot holes. Only way out is to make a new “EVENT” and quickly change subjects.
This is a Military-Civilian alliance.
Keyboard warriors deal great damage by our constant attacks on the “NARRATIVE”. Finding the plot holes forces Fake News into corrections.
Since their NARRATIVES are based on lies they make mistakes (plot holes) that observant anons can spot and hammer. MSM must “explain” in an attempt to prevent “PUBLIC AWAKENING” to their lies.
It works like this:
I tell you B beat C.
You ask, "Why?"
Now I must explain, "B hated C because B is a misogynist."
You point out that B isn't. B has a wife, daughters and three sisters.
I must further explain. Each question pushes me to write more "narrative" to explain my original story. Eventually I've written so much that I get lost in my own lies and I start to make mistakes in the plot. There are things I didn't think about. Maybe I didn't know something vital about B's history or the location the "attack" happened or the angle of the camera. You force mistakes in my lies (narrative).
Every time anons/ public point out a weakness or push for more answers we weaken their narrative and force them into likely error.
Ulvade was just a simple "school shooting" story, but now look at them scramble to explain the mysterious hour, all the doors not locking, the teacher propping open the door as the killer comes, ect.
Even they start to get lost in their own lies. Their attempts to straighten it out among each other only leads to further errors as the narrative gets too complex. Eventually they have no choice but to changed the subject and exhaust another "event".
This strains their control of the NARRATIVE and exposes them further.
That is why Conspiracy Theorists constantly questioning the "NARRATIVE" is so dangerous to their control. We force them to write more "story" to explain the plot holes.
Failure to explain will mean being caught in their lies and risk public awakening. They can't allow that so they change the subject when the lies of one story are about to be exposed do to relentless public exposure.
You describe the proble. With lies. With lies a person's narrative is too shallow Nd can not withstand questioning.
Whe. I was LE, we did a test. We had 2 officers in training g play bad guys. Gave them a story and an hour to make up and agree to as much detail as possible about the story.
Then we pretend to stop them, do a roadside interview on both. Ask about 5 questions before their entire agreed upon narrative is used up and the lies exposed.
Two people can only come up with a narrative so deep. Eventually you will ask questions they didn't plan for and the answers won't jive.
Not only this, but we show normies how the other school shootings were similar to the Uvalde shooting, thus resurrecting Sandy Hook, Parkland, etc., and bringing them back into the spotlight.
I'm still mad about the memory hole of the child terrorist training camp hidden underground in the desert that was plowed out and destroyed without investigation.
Well, somehow we must demonstrate we don't buy their lies.
I spoke up day one of covid. I never backed down, or changed my tune. Took grief from work, family and some friends. Now, most of them have come around. Some who listened stayed safe. No shots, no mental breakdowns etc. They see it now but nobody brings up the fact I told the. Over 2 years ago it was b.s.
Well, I tend to agree with the idea that the British Empire became and remains the center of the global cabal, so if any single country is the head of the snake, then that's it... Assuming the true target is the head of the snake, then my answer would be the British Empire (east india company was really the moving power behind everything). But that's me reading an assumption into the question.
Speaking of Afghanistan... who really screwed that place up in the first place? 🇬🇧
We have something similar happening the Canada Day weekend (maybe) in Ottawa. A lot of us suspect a huge False Flag/Media creation/Government shenanigan to occur in order to counter the events with the ultra-Canadian-patriot James Topp. He, and other ex-military/vets are combining with civilians to push information awareness of government abuse and hopefully cause mandate-bullshit ceasing. The MSM has ignored him until just recently, but they are desperately trying to play catch-up and change their stance on the narrative to try and take back control, the dumbasses.
The Public is a tidal wave of narrative-countering now. The government is desperate to take back control. EXCELLENT!
I'm noticing more and more fellow Canadians around me are absolutely fed up with Turdeau and his antics... It's beautiful!
u/lonewulf
This is my interpretation of it:
The PEOPLE (general public) questioning the NARRATIVE forces the MSM to “adjust” and “alter” the NARRATIVE in an attempt to recapture control. After a point this pressure becomes so great that the PUBLIC is writing the NARRATIVE.
Loss of NARRATIVE CONTROL (generalized information) means MSM must “change” the subject (expend ammunition) to make a new NARRATIVE before the public becomes too skeptical of the former Narrative.
This is a Military-Civilian alliance.
Keyboard warriors deal great damage by our constant attacks on the “NARRATIVE”. Finding the plot holes forces Fake News into corrections.
Since their NARRATIVES are based on lies they make mistakes (plot holes) that observant anons can spot and hammer. MSM must “explain” in an attempt to prevent “PUBLIC AWAKENING” to their lies.
It works like this:
I tell you B beat C.
You ask, "Why?"
Now I must explain, "B hated C because B is a misogynist."
You point out that B isn't. B has a wife, daughters and three sisters.
I must further explain. Each question pushes me to write more "narrative" to explain my original story. Eventually I've written so much that I get lost in my own lies and I start to make mistakes in the plot. There are things I didn't think about. Maybe I didn't know something vital about B's history or the location the "attack" happened or the angle of the camera. You force mistakes in my lies (narrative).
Every time anons/ public point out a weakness or push for more answers we weaken their narrative and force them into likely error.
Ulvade was just a simple "school shooting" story, but now look at them scramble to explain the mysterious hour, all the doors not locking, the teacher propping open the door as the killer comes, ect.
Even they start to get lost in their own lies. Their attempts to straighten it out among each other only leads to further errors as the narrative gets too complex. Eventually they have no choice but to changed the subject and exhaust another "event".
This strains their control of the NARRATIVE and exposes them further.
That is why Conspiracy Theorists constantly questioning the "NARRATIVE" is so dangerous to their control. We force them to write more "story" to explain the plot holes.
Failure to explain will mean being caught in their lies and risk public awakening. They can't allow that so they change the subject when the lies of one story are about to be exposed do to relentless public exposure.
Or that's my take.
You describe the proble. With lies. With lies a person's narrative is too shallow Nd can not withstand questioning.
Whe. I was LE, we did a test. We had 2 officers in training g play bad guys. Gave them a story and an hour to make up and agree to as much detail as possible about the story.
Then we pretend to stop them, do a roadside interview on both. Ask about 5 questions before their entire agreed upon narrative is used up and the lies exposed.
Two people can only come up with a narrative so deep. Eventually you will ask questions they didn't plan for and the answers won't jive.
The truth on the other hand...
Not only this, but we show normies how the other school shootings were similar to the Uvalde shooting, thus resurrecting Sandy Hook, Parkland, etc., and bringing them back into the spotlight.
This is a very important factor. They want people to memory hole past events so you don't try and form a correlation to them.
I'm still mad about the memory hole of the child terrorist training camp hidden underground in the desert that was plowed out and destroyed without investigation.
Well, somehow we must demonstrate we don't buy their lies.
I spoke up day one of covid. I never backed down, or changed my tune. Took grief from work, family and some friends. Now, most of them have come around. Some who listened stayed safe. No shots, no mental breakdowns etc. They see it now but nobody brings up the fact I told the. Over 2 years ago it was b.s.
"This has never been attempted.
Use of general public to counter the narrative [propaganda] push by controlled media."
IW = Irregular Warfare
IW = Information Warfare
IW + IW = IWIW
IWIW = Irregular Weaponized Information Warfare
[Open tab w/ https://qagg.news/ to retrieve TS and Q drops]
https://qagg.news/?q=%23%23TO16517%2CTO17067%2CTO17092.TO17102%2CTO17497%2CTO17501%2CTO17579
http://alphahuman.org/cia-ex-counterintelligence-chief-james-olson-the-assault-on-americas-secrets/
http://press.georgetown.edu/book/georgetown/catch-spy
https://media.defense.gov/2020/Oct/02/2002510472/-1/-1/0/Irregular-Warfare-Annex-to-the-National-Defense-Strategy-Summary.PDF
https://protectamerica.vote/
https://brushbeater.files.wordpress.com/2018/11/rand_pe273.pdf
https://andmagazine.substack.com/p/whats-the-connection-between-eric
https://qagg.news/?q=%23%233882
https://2009-2017.state.gov/documents/organization/119629.pdf
Wouldn't the last one be IWIW?
Thanks Vet
"What Country was the true intended target?"
https://qagg.news/?q=%23%233882
https://youtu.be/WY9ZjE_KOCQ
Figure out when Q ops began and what was done to prepare the battle space, but more importantly, what battle space is being fought over right now.
Now... reread the COIN manual with a "mirror."
Watch this again...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VA4e0NqyYMw
Sleep on it.
Literally, sleep on it.
I mean, these guys rarely miss...
https://southpark.cc.com/video-clips/vvsb0z/south-park-america-s-oldest-enemy
Yes, that is my suggestion. Could be wrong, probably wrong 🤷🏻😂
Well, I tend to agree with the idea that the British Empire became and remains the center of the global cabal, so if any single country is the head of the snake, then that's it... Assuming the true target is the head of the snake, then my answer would be the British Empire (east india company was really the moving power behind everything). But that's me reading an assumption into the question.
Speaking of Afghanistan... who really screwed that place up in the first place? 🇬🇧
That is the counterinsurgency doctrine which our own green berets often practiced as they worked on coin issues in Iraq and Afghanistan.
The green berets were formed by kennedy to help Americans throw off an insurge.cy. we PRACTICED in foreign countries.
Maybe that is why pg 49 had to give them permission to operate outside the u.s. In Behalf of other nations. They were not originally formed for that.
Yes, a Counter-insurgency requires public support.