I'm gonna take two weeks to decide on whether I think the real Q is back, even if given 100% irrefutable evidence. There is too much tension and too much of a chance for chaos should this be some ruse.
Proofs are necessary at this stage. Any new Q posts need to prove beyond a statistical doubt that Trump's Truth posts and Q's Posts are posted synchronously, just like in the old days.
Deltas with Trump's Truths are the only thing that will convince me beyond a reasonable doubt, and a fair number of them at that.
Q posts, then Trump posts shortly after. When the time between the two shrinks, it shows they are calibrating for further proofs. This convergence of timestamps shows Q has foreknowledge of Trump's posts before he makes them, and was how Q initially showed he was legitimate way back when.
You don't have to join me in this trial of cynicism, but with all the shenanigans lately, I am erring on the side of caution.
I only ask that you don't assume I'm dooming when I try to poke holes in Q's comeback. I'm simply performing my due diligence as an autist.
This is a wise approach. I've always been quite skeptical of deltas, on the basis that there are several factors that can influence when people post.
During Q's active time, he would often post many times a day. Trump was also an active Twitter user and would post many times a day.
Trump and Q both are likely operating within North America, and therefore are posting in roughly the same time zone. This would mean their active posting hours are likely going to line up.
Trump was known to tweet in response to news stories as he was watching them. Q was also a huge news junkie and was constantly posting stuff from the news as soon as he saw it, possibly in response to the same new story on the same channel.
So when I look at it from this perspective, it's not exactly surprising that two conservative news junkies who posted many times a day from roughly the same time zone about politics in response to breaking news stories would sometimes have posts that are pretty close to one another.
They don't need to have any real connection beyond those three in order to have a lot of potential overlap in their posting habits. Anyone who wants to share deltas with Trump just needs to be awake when he is, post many times a day, and respond to the same types of news stories that he does when they break.
In fact, I'd bet that if some diligent researcher out there collected the tweets from a sample of North American twitter users who are prolific in the political discussions, you'd find many more deltas with those accounts and Q than you'd expect.
Without doing that, it's kind of hard to establish a baseline on how many "coincidences" is too many coincidences. Which means that "how many coincidences" to convince me is probably going to be pretty high, and will probably require more connection than mere similarity in posting times.