Texas, not POTUS, brought a constitutional complaint against the states who illegally modified their elections laws contrary to the requirements in the constitution. The case was brought to the lowest court having original jurisdiction to hear such cases, the Supreme Court. Texas eminently had standing.
The Supreme Court shockingly ruled Texas had no standing. They didn’t even entertain arguments on the issue of standing, they just kept their own incorrect counsel and ruled incorrectly.
It was a complete abrogation of the law. And the court has not changed since then. The same court now delivers us this ruling. Which can only mean this ruling has the cabal’s blessing. They are up to something.
oh, sorry; I read a comment last week where someone said 'Texas and POTUS' were ruled to have no standing and didn't look into it/remember the specifics from the time - was there 2 separate rulings or something?
The same supreme court that found texas had no standing overturned roe v. wade.
By that, I mean to say, if "they" didn't want it overturned, it wouldn't have been overturned.
They are up to something. We're not winning.
Lol.
And you don't think they said Texas and POTUS 'had no standing' because he's still the president?
Or that they tricked the cabal into thinking they had the supreme court on their side?
What?
Texas, not POTUS, brought a constitutional complaint against the states who illegally modified their elections laws contrary to the requirements in the constitution. The case was brought to the lowest court having original jurisdiction to hear such cases, the Supreme Court. Texas eminently had standing.
The Supreme Court shockingly ruled Texas had no standing. They didn’t even entertain arguments on the issue of standing, they just kept their own incorrect counsel and ruled incorrectly.
It was a complete abrogation of the law. And the court has not changed since then. The same court now delivers us this ruling. Which can only mean this ruling has the cabal’s blessing. They are up to something.
oh, sorry; I read a comment last week where someone said 'Texas and POTUS' were ruled to have no standing and didn't look into it/remember the specifics from the time - was there 2 separate rulings or something?
This was the only one I remember. It was unbelievable.
This court can’t be trusted.
Lol.
And you don't think they said Texas and POTUS 'had no standing' because he's still the president?
Or that they tricked the cabal into thinking they had the supreme court on their side?