287
posted ago by FractalizingIron ago by FractalizingIron +288 / -1

Sauce: https://qanon.pub/#4958

What is at stake? 
Who has control?
SURPRISE WITNESS.
Who was surprised?
Who will be surprised?
Use your logic.
Can emotions be used to influence decisions?
How do you control emotion?
Define 'Plant'.
How do you insert a plant?
Can emotions be used to insert a plant?
Who is Cassidy Hutchinson?
Trust the plan.
Q

Note: Q is asking questions in order to stimulate a thinking process. Q's questions are in -Bold Italics-. (Potential) Answers indicated by "A:"


-What is at stake?-

A: The whole enchilada. The Jan 6 false flag is a bulwark against the American People discovering how deep their treason goes. That bulwark falls, and the floodgates open.

-Who has control?-

A: The Patriots have control. DJT, Q Team, Devolved Military.

-SURPRISE WITNESS.-

A: [Statement]. Indicates Cassidy.

-Who was surprised?-

A: Hmmmm. No one paying attention is surprised that the Unselect pulled a 'surprise witness' with bogus info, info that can be debunked within hours no less. So, who was surprised? Speculation the Unselect DS was surprised. As in Cassidy raised her hand, and said: "I have damning evidence on Trumpy!"

Speculation Unselected said, "Great. Let's put her up there! We need SOMETHING to distract everyone! Roe Vs Wade, etc., etc..... everything is going to shit!"

-Who will be surprised?-

A: Speculation The Unselected will be surprised (were surprised?) that 1) the evidence of the 'surprise witness' is totally bogus and easily debunked and 2) that in fact, the surprise witness was .... a plant?

-Use your logic.-

A: [Exhortation by Q to apply correct and effective thinking processes, in order to correctly decypher and understand what is going on in the situation/event being discussed.] Yes, Sir! Right away, Sir! <salutes>

-Can emotions be used to influence decisions?-

A: Yes, emotions can be used to influence decisions.

-How do you control emotion?-

A: 1) Information - true, false, partly true/false information can be used to influence emotional response, as emotions respond to conceptual constructs. 2) pressure, situational conditioning - e.g. presenting 'a massive threat' can be used to trigger fear, for example, and manipulate the desired emotional outcome. Or creating a situation where there is a desperate need, and thus, target is conditioned to respond urgently and without thinking. Or, offering something so 'juicy' that the recipient is more concerned with how it might benefit them than considering whether its true or something else is going on.

-Define 'Plant'.-

A: (Sauce: The Free Dictionary)

A person or thing put into place in order to mislead or function secretly, especially: a. A person placed in a group of spectators to influence behavior. b. A person stationed in a given location as a spy or observer. c. A misleading piece of evidence placed so as to be discovered. d. A remark or action in a play or narrative that becomes important later.

-How do you insert a plant?-

A: Many different methods might exist. One possible method is: Manipulate emotional response of target(s) by offering something tempting in a situation where great pressure is created by intense or desperate need, or by perceived massive personal gain, etc. Plant is accepted because decision making process is compromised by fear, need and desperation, or avarice and ambition.

-Can emotions be used to insert a plant?-

A: [Q is delivering a two-part pronged question. “How do you insert a plant” = question to stimulate thought direction. “Can emotions be used to insert a plant?”= question to direct reader to correct direction.] See above.

-Who is Cassidy Hutchinson?-

A: Anon Question: is Cassidy Hutchinson a plant? Is she a sacrificial pawn who agreed to go to the Jan 6 committee and offer a bogus, easily debunkable story to the Unselect Committee? Who is she? Digs on this are likely to yield important info.

EDIT: Anon (u/Serendipity8): "Cassidy worked for Meadows, Scalise and Ted Cruz, according to a bio I just read. Will try to find link".

EDIT: Alt. Is the information (story about Potus, the limo, the stranglehold, etc) the plant, offered to Hutchinson at a time when they knew she would lap it up because of her ambition?

-Trust the plan.-

A: WWG1WGA.

-Q-

A: Thank you, Q.


Possible interpretation: Is Q asking us to consider that in fact, Hutchinson is a plant inserted by the Q team in order to misdirect and subvert the Unselected Jan 6 Committee? Is it possible that, using the timing of the Supreme Court decisions, which have put incredible pressure on the DEMS, Deep State, Q team manipulated their emotional condition to have them recklessly and foolishly accept the plant of Hutchinson with a story so patently ridiculous that it will both redpill a lot more normies but also highlight the absolute illegitimacy and ludicrous nature of the Jan 6 premise as a whole, including the sham committee investigation?

Q finishing up with "Trust the Plan" feels like a confirmation that the Surprise Witness was part of Q work (aka the Plan), but that's just a feeling (that's a rather subjective interpretation)

Alternative Interpretation: Cassidy Hutchinson was a plant from the DS, into the Republican ranks, and eventually into the WH, in wait for such a time as this. However, if Hutchinson is DS plant, how does that make sense in the context of all Q's questions here? Was Hutchinson perhaps a white hat plant to the DS rank and file from way back? A sort of double agent, pretending to be DS sympathizer but in fact, inserted by the White Hats a good time back?

*Addendum: additional speculation; Q is simply messing with the DS Unselect, trolling them into thinking that Hutchinson was a plant.

Addendum (Update): By all looks and appearances, it seems that Cassidy Hutchinson is a rather sad case of someone wanting to get ahead, and then being spurned (reportedly she wanted to staff at Mar A Lago, but was rejected by DJT due to being mediocre at best) decided to become a witness to the Unselect Jan 6. (see: Bannon Interview with Joanna Miller – Former WH Senior Policy Analyst (see also: Bannon War Room discussion re: Hutchinson's testimony between Bannon, Ephshteyn, and Posobeic first 15 minutes

Is it possible that Hutchinson's emotions were manipulated and used in order to plant this lameass story in her, by the WH Deputy Chief of Staff and Head of SS, who she apparently heard this story from? Did they set her up, knowing she would likely, at the right time, spill the beans? Was she the set up? Meaning that the story was the plant, Hutchinson herself not the plant but the soil in which the plant was planted? That seems plausible given the apparently sad nature of this woman's character....

Final Edit: Jury is still out whether this or that or the other is in fact Q. This analysis done on the (unproven) premise that the drop is legit from Q, and will obviously be null and void should that eventually prove not to be the case.

Q1842:

-"Never Interfere With an Enemy While He’s in the Process of Destroying Himself."-

Comments (121)
sorted by:
50
Fefifofumdrum 50 points ago +51 / -1

Nicely done OP.

This Hutchinson thing will, for all its bluster and unsubstantiated fluff, have an disproportionately large impact on how the country negatively views the democrats.

She was a nail in the coffin, used to discredit the entire J6 thing, and people everywhere are rolling their eyes.

I hope she has been paid well enough to disappear for awhile.

13
Magpi 13 points ago +13 / -0

I agree. Just when you think the Dems can sink no further, along comes another stooge.

And I'm guessing when the Dems are done with her, she'll "disappear" forever.

3
BigJilm01 3 points ago +3 / -0

She can be roomies with Christine Blasey Ford

30
SaveAmerica2021 30 points ago +30 / -0

Easily within the realm of possibilities especially when she says stuff like

Trump proclaiming Im the fking President...lol

27
polish_snausage 27 points ago +27 / -0

It sounds like Schiff wrote her lines...

5
FractalizingIron [S] 5 points ago +5 / -0

Jack Posobeic reckons this is what Rachel Maddow is writing when she's not doing her show.

1
polish_snausage 1 point ago +1 / -0

Lol

16
TheHumanPrimer 16 points ago +17 / -1

Actually, I empathize with the President. If you are the most powerful guy in the country then nobody, I mean nobody would be able to deny you the perogative to go where ever you choose to go. Give this, I don't see any secret service agent telling DJT- President that he CAN"T do something as simple as a ride to a building. Just wouldn't and couldn't happen. But if it did, and I was him, I too would be very angry, forceful and adament... so if the scenario DID happen as described I say "Good for him" and add these three words, "You are fired!"

20
FractalizingIron [S] 20 points ago +20 / -0

Yeah.... nah. It never happened. It's BS.

9
redtoe-skipper 9 points ago +9 / -0

I would bet that is something Hussein or spleepedo Bidexit would say

8
ozthentic 8 points ago +8 / -0

Absolutely!

7
fazzman23 7 points ago +7 / -0

the limo thing was so ridiculous too...OP could be onto something

5
Mister_Winston 5 points ago +5 / -0

The limo story is up there with Trump watching The Gorilla Channel, though the latter was way funnier.

2
AllowMeToExplain 2 points ago +2 / -0

It is dumb even for Adam Schiff...so it is not a leap to think that there is more to this than meets the eye. Plus, Trump's response to it was unusually mocking of someone. He doesn't even personally attack Schiff or Pelosi or Cheney as he did this witness.

1
Island_Photo 1 point ago +1 / -0

I love the " Schiff video" with the speeding fishtailing beast...

29
FractalizingIron [S] 29 points ago +29 / -0

Note: the Blue Check marks are out in force:

https://twitter.com/Alyssafarah/status/1541857822740283400?s=20&t=X2BYd6LPtvq5Il0mHn-aHw

Alyssa Farah Griffin ("Conservative. CCN political commentator") tweeted:

Cassidy Hutchinson is my friend. I knew her testimony would be damning. I had no idea it’d be THIS damning. I am so grateful for her courage & integrity.

To anyone who would try to impugn her character, I’d be glad to put you in touch w/ @January6thCmte to appear UNDER OATH.

Blue Check marks respond:

Dan Rather: The biggest scandal in American political history. And that’s saying a lot. Jaw dropping. Sickening. Infuriating.

George Conway: He. Physically. Attacked. A. Secret. Service. Agent.

Rick Wilson: There has never in my lifetime been a Congressional hearing more damning to a President. Never. This makes Watergate’s darkest moments look like a bridge club meeting.

Adam Kinzinger: Cassidy Hutchinson is one of the most brave and honorable people I know.

Etc. The replies to this twiff by all the blue checkmarks are ludicrous, but let's face it: twiffer is a propaganda machine.

17
Oskar64 17 points ago +17 / -0

I love the smell of desperation first thing in the morning.

1
Monco121 1 point ago +1 / -0

And by the afternoon it's a stench that won't go away.🐸

10
Europa 10 points ago +11 / -1

Oh my…all the Twitter deep state fluffers came out.

Lol

1
Irishman4trump5 1 point ago +1 / -0

KEK! Oh the visual you just put in my head Fren!

8
SaveAmerica2021 8 points ago +9 / -1

Dan Rather ......dope

6
Mr_A 6 points ago +6 / -0

I applaud you for trawling through the blue-checkmark waters to catch this stuff. Excellent compilation.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
20
JC77 20 points ago +20 / -0

I think your conclusions there are exactly right.

16
Narg 16 points ago +16 / -0

Solid analysis and great formatting.

14
CaptainChrisPBacon 14 points ago +14 / -0

Someone on here immediately said she had to be a plant. That no one would lie that balantly. Where it could be debunked almost immediately.

12
FondueFerret 12 points ago +12 / -0

I don't know about that. They lie blatantly on a daily basis and have lied blatantly about Trump for years. The normies / leftists gobble it up and have never cared about the debunking from our side, even if you show them clear evidence including a correction of articles etc.

4
RugerP89 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yet postulate that Biden is a WH "plant" and watch GAW cry out.

12
Hodar 12 points ago +12 / -0

Cassidy Huchenson is 25 years old today, which would have made her 23 years old at the time of the event.

Nobody is Chief Coffeemaker to the President at 23 years old.

12
FractalizingIron [S] 12 points ago +12 / -0

"Two Sugars Hutchinson"

Bannon and crew nicknamed her "two sugars".

11
Caprica777 11 points ago +12 / -1

These are the kind of Q posts that I’ve missed

10
americanjerky 10 points ago +10 / -0

This drop isn’t meant for anons, it’s meant for the deep state to install fear. Is she a plant or no? Who else are you working with that could be a plant? Anybody is suspect there as they continue to tear each other down.

2
Greekish 2 points ago +2 / -0

to install fear

to instil fear

1
FractalizingIron [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

To install the instilment, still.

1
americanjerky 1 point ago +1 / -0

No, install fear, into the NPCs, malaka :)

9
QbekPatriot 9 points ago +9 / -0

Cassidy wearing white... !?

1
dec3169 1 point ago +1 / -0

That's ok - it is still before Labor Day.

9
libtards_r_stoopid 9 points ago +9 / -0

At first i was pissed at this bitch but i now believe she is a whitehat plant that tempted the retarded left with a made up story to good to be true in order to make the sham J6 hearing look even that much more ridiculous and desperately grasping for straws in the eyes of normies. Brilliant. Winning!

6
FractalizingIron [S] 6 points ago +6 / -0

I'm currently digging around on her. Seems like she is a rather insipid wanna be. She applied to be staff at Mar A Lago after DJT left the WH, but was rejected.

On closer investigation (no doubt need to do a lot more digging over the next day or two) I'm leaning to thinkin that the story was the plant. That she was the sucker (the patsy) and the story was planted in her, by the Dep CoS and the Head of the SS. See my addended edits to the post.

7
CONDOR 7 points ago +7 / -0

Leaning pretty hard you way, Fract.

This was the only part of the testimony that piqued my interest...

@ 3:54:34 --> 3:56:45

https://youtu.be/bC3_VFFJlSY?list=RDCMUC6ZFN9Tx6xh-skXCuRHCDpQ&t=14074

Meadows shuts her out.

Gut says she's was a plant, a known plant.

A jabberjay.

"Their cries reverberated and he caught a glimpse of small black birds perched above them. The name 'jabberjay' popped into his mind. A brief chapter in his genetics class. The failed experiment, the bird that could repeat human speech, that had been a tool for espionage until the rebels had figured out its abilities and sent it back carrying false information."

page 115

The Ballad of Songbirds and Snakes

1
v8power 1 point ago +1 / -0

https://youtu.be/j6nxoPeJBjM?t=30 (timestamp, 45 seconds)

3
MAG768720 3 points ago +3 / -0

I have not researched any part of this story at all, but will say that generally ...

If you want someone to give convincing "testimony," then they should actually believe what they are saying.

Here, we have someone claiming they heard someone else say something. It is not first-hand knowledge (and, therefore, hearsay, though these criminals don't care about that).

So, it is more likely that she believed the story that she says she overheard, than that she made it up herself to rock the committee's world.

BTW, the hardcore leftist dimwits are eating this up like it is etched in stone. Leftist radio station is pushing it hard, as if it could have happened and did. To quote Q, "These people are stupid."

1
RedPillQ17 1 point ago +1 / -0

How many times did that lying bitch recount what SOMEONE ELSE said (illegal "hearsay" 3rd hand info to begin with) and use the phrase "something to the effect of _______" (which equals total SUBJECTIVE interpretation - on top it already being hearsay)!

8
Magasperger 8 points ago +8 / -0
3
Greatheart 3 points ago +3 / -0

It would have been awesome if President Trump was the surprise witness and he only said one thing.

The storm is upon us!

I don't think anyone could miss that trending on Twitter.

8
TNBanjoMan 8 points ago +8 / -0

I posted on this too (https://greatawakening.win/p/15IXu5wRrl/todays-q-drop-4958/)

I think your analysis is deeper than mine, I just found significance in the first two lines and discussed.

8
redtoe-skipper 8 points ago +8 / -0

indeed. Nice answers!

Who was surprised?

Not we, I guess. Another Omarosa! I am wondering when her book will come out and how many MSDNC appearances she will get.

added: https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=plant

an agent of misinformation, placed in a group to deceive, distract, or provoke That man who keeps starting drama, seemingly for no reason, is suspect of being a plant.

Or

Used in the entertainment business, when someone accomplish something with a "help" or a "connection" with someone from the inside. "The reason he won that contest, was because he was a plant."

Are we in the entertainment business?

A movie critic; one who is paid off from a major movie studio to give a fake positive fluff review. Sometimes the said "critic" doesn't even exist at all, and is just a fake name with a fake quote. Studios use this tactic as damage control for a potential flop. "The 3% of critics who gave positive reviews for Battlefield Earth on Rotten Tomatoes definitely had to be plants from Warner Bros. studios. No one could ever voluntarily praise that movie without being bribed. "

Note the bribe .....

1: V. To place incriminating evidence in a place likely to be found by the authorities.

Quite so!

8
Michonne21 8 points ago +8 / -0

She was used and not only took the bait but swallowed the hook. It’s seems she likes drama, was undermining her superiors, lacked character and wanted to feel important. They let her hear nonsense, then she ran to Liz where they blew smoke up her butt and she smelled a book deal. She is Jussie Smell-it.

7
BasedCitizen 7 points ago +7 / -0

Reminds me of that time when Trump leaked his own audio tape. This is definitely a play he is capable of. :)

https://youtu.be/nnMsUaT6e8k

6
CONDOR 6 points ago +6 / -0
4
CONDOR 4 points ago +4 / -0

TO19237

Gregg Phillips / @greggphillips 06/29/2022 08:12:12

"We pledge to each other our lives, our fortunes, and our sacred honor."

Our great nation under God was built on this pledge 246 years ago.

The spirit of these words is renewed for most once a year on July 4th.

We get to watch them acted out every day on this platform and in our comms with each other.

for freedom,

g2

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G-2_(intelligence)

https://qagg.news/?q=%23%23TO19237

6
Donny_Fiasco 6 points ago +6 / -0

I think your update nailed it.

She was played by someone she trusted.

Her information was laughably debunk-able.

6
2ndenthusiast 6 points ago +6 / -0

Seeing this in realtime is incredible.

5
MilitaryJustice 5 points ago +5 / -0

Another self-inflicted wound by the Left-Tards. They just can't stop shooting themselves in the foot.

5
GetsTheNogginJoggin 5 points ago +6 / -1

Is it possible that, when Q asks if emotions can be used to insert a plant, that Q means something like Deep Dream/Project Monarch?

Christine Blasey Ford comes to mind.

3
FractalizingIron [S] 3 points ago +3 / -0

Contextually, not relevant, imo.

0
GetsTheNogginJoggin 0 points ago +1 / -1

Idk.

We have a capital “P” plant and two lowercase plants. I feel like they might be two different things.

1
nineohseven 1 point ago +1 / -0

Plantagenet?

1
FractalizingIron [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

What? Fighting roses now, are we?

5
Lalge0229 5 points ago +5 / -0

I did notice her display some of the “duper’s delight” behavior ala Peter Strozk at his hearing…fascinating…

0
fponick 0 points ago +1 / -1

Like what?

2
Lalge0229 2 points ago +2 / -0

She has to fight smirking and smiling at inappropriate times, just like Strozk did. And squirming in her seat but very tight controlled mannerisms that seem almost Ultra MK if not at the least over rehearsed

2
fponick 2 points ago +2 / -0

Thanks! Very helpful.

5
deloppoled 5 points ago +5 / -0

Great post, I think you hit the nail on the head with the addendum too. The Ultra MAGA King called her a leaker yesterday which I think supports your post.

Donald J. Trump / @realDonaldTrump 06/28/2022 13:02:52 https://truthsocial.com/users/realDonaldTrump/statuses/108556410689094582

I hardly know who this person, Cassidy Hutchinson, is, other than I heard very negative things about her (a total phony and “leaker”), and when she requested to go with certain others of the team to Florida after my having served a full term in office, I personally turned her request down.

3
MAG768720 3 points ago +3 / -0

If she is a known "leaker," then it adds credibility to the idea that she was set up with a fake story so she could leak it to the J6 Unselect Committee.

4
Uhtred 4 points ago +5 / -1

Who has control isnt so black and white.

The deepstate still has significant power and control. They are losing institutional control and perhaps already have, I'm leaning towards the latter, but the support for their corrupt system by the normies is, though near destroyed, is still enough to allow them to be in positions of power and keep their system in place. Fair to say that the deep state has some power and control still but is not at all in total control

The whitehats clearly have the ability to stop any overly damaging legislation like the trillion dollar bills and stacking scotus and whitehats appear to be in control of scotus, making Biden looks like an idiot with Afghanistan withdrawal etc. But even if whitehats have wrestled institutional control away from the deep state, whitehats could not assume total power, declare it publicly and not end up in a nasty kinetic world war. It is undeniable whitehats are executing a master plan but it is fair to say whitehats have some power and control and are likewise not in total control, if they were, the war would be over and freedom from this tyranny would actually exist in society.

This is only speaking about America as well, Putin certainly seems to be a whitehat and I hear he has 85% favourability ratings from the Russian people. Does Putin or the Russian people have the power?

In the USA constitution, power has always meant to reside with the people right? Since day 1. We elect and send a representative "in place of us" to speak on our behalf and advocate for shit we want. We delegate our power to the elected officials but the intention was power is and always should be held by the people, scotus overturned roe v wade with the intention of returning power to the people and the people's elected state representatives will act on the will of the people and legislate yes or no on abortion so we have already seen a big statement saying power has been returned to the people with scotus decision on abortion, the other suspected scotus case against fema using the 14th amendment could could change federal government forever, removing a bunch of their powers and agencies from power which seems to me actually be returning the power back to the people. Putin is acting on the will of his people? The Russian people have the power and are wielding their power in a unified front, through Putin.

Maybe the answer to who has the power is "we the people" but this time the will of the people will be heard and respected now and the power we delegate to our elected officials will be used according to the will of the people .

8
FractalizingIron [S] 8 points ago +8 / -0

Worth discussing.

When reading any text, and especially a Qdrop, there are a number of things one should probably take into consideration, including factual info, linked drops or information (that is, info that is linked via: allusion, direct reference, cryptic reference, etc), timing, overall context, etc.

Then, analysis based on all these elements. For example, in this drop, why would Q ask "Who has control?" Contextually, the implication is firstly that the DS does not have control, really. COntextually, the question is framed by other questions and discussion around the J6 committee, the surprise witness, Cassidy Hutchinson. Why would Q make some random allusion to whether 'the people are in control or not' in this context?

That's not really logical. Overall, its a worthwhile question, but contextually, it doesn't fit.

The context is the skirmish between the DS Dems (in the form of the J6 committee) and the White Hats. Logically, the question goes then to which of these is (really) in control.

Contextually, it doesn't seem to me to be discussing an unrelated larger question. Obviously, Logically, "Patriots in Control" does not mean the Patriots control every single thing. In any war, there is territory controlled by one side, and territory controlled by the other. If all the territory is controlled by one side, then the war is over, as you have pointed out.

Some folks took "Patriots in control" in the Q drops to mean "the Patriots control everything". I don't think that's a logical inference. But, consider a chess game. Once a player has the upper hand, he can be considered to be incontrol if he can define the moves the opponent must or will make, even though the opponent is on control of his own pieces. That's why a Chess master will capitulate when he knows, its over 5, 10, 12 moves down the road. But the DS is not a chess master. This war is for their very existence. They will not give up, ever.

The best anons I know of understand "patriots in control" to mean, the White Hats have the upper hand, are guiding or directing the situation because they are forcing the DS into situations and actions that WHs want them to do.

That overarching feature of the current war is the feature that Q is alluding to in this question "Who has control", I think.

Example: DS thinks, we'll get this woman to testify. That will help us. But WH team has already outmaneuvered them, 5 steps ahead, and know that this move will in fact hasten the DS demise, not help them in the long run. Thus, "Patriots have control".

That's how I read it, anyway.

2
Uhtred 2 points ago +2 / -0

Admittedly, my previous message was an incomplete thought, I enjoyed writing it, maybe has validity elsewhere but I think you are right that the scenario I suggested is not contextually relevant. I think I blurred the line between control and power as well. It was great reading your reply, I have been thinking about taking a deep dive into the NZ Deep State, I'm a Kiwi living in NZ and I would do this deep dive with the intention to write strong arguments about NZ Deep State ops

I started supporting Trump after Al Smith Charity Dinner 2016. Before that I was apolitical. I evolved through r/The_Donald to thedonald.win/patriots.win up until Biden inauguration. The dooming at patriots.win was savage that day. I found Q on Biden inauguration day as it goes. Anyway, I was all in on following GEOTUS and riding the Trump Train, I debated as hard as i could etc online, banned all over the place, but generally completely unaware of Q. Also and the main point, I was fixated on American politics, I completely tuned out everything in NZ media and politics. Only as i learned about the scale and power of the machine we're up against did I begin to consider my own government was corrupted and a cog in that machine referenced above.

I missed seeing the politics and feeling the pulse of NZ, apart from major events, from 2016 till last few months, I don't really know what happened, I'm quite fearful I'll overlook an event or issue I should know about or would have heard about if I was paying attention, like I do with Q and previously patriots.win, and I'll end up making ineffective posts (on fb) that don't aid people waking up in any way.

I think I have a simple but complete way to describe the interconnected hidden power structures in nz and other Western countries and globally, I can explain tax and other expenses that make us debt slaves, I can point out masks are useless, vaccine is bio warfare, lockdowns are advancing global systems to control the people among heaps of other subjects. But those topics are all conspiracy related and can make peoples eyes glaze over. My old work mates daughter is asleep but smart, as soon as I said I was interested in conspiracy theories I seen her perception of me change in real time lol.

Writing this out has been another incomplete thought but I think a real easy way to describe it is I want to have enough facts about nz deep state that people can ask themselves how many coincidences until it becomes mathematically impossible to be just coincidence.

3
FractalizingIron [S] 3 points ago +3 / -0

Thanks for taking the time to reply, Uh.

This anon is waving at you from across the ditch. I live in crazy central here, (I like to refer to our CCP state as Danistan - hoping you will understand the reference. Otherwise, they named this south east corner after the Queen of England who reigned in the 1800's.)

Keep at it.

I stumbled across some red pills in 2015, and then went down other rabbit holes in 2016. Once I first listened to speeches by DJT, I could tell this guy was dimensionally and intrinsically different to ALL the establishment pollies out there.

After DJT was elected, I though, shite, I'd better find out what's going on in Oz, if there is alt-media here, etc. That's when I began looking at Oz situation, and started posting etc on Aus forums (faesbuk to start with) and learning about our alt-media.

So it was that I was primed and ready when Q came along, and then followed along behind Q since end of 2017/start of 2018.

My prime focus was on the USA during 2018 to 2020, but once Covid19 hit, I knew I had to pay more attention to home soil.

My digital soldiering went local realworld with 2021, when Dan Andrews began lifting our lockdowns.

Point is, we all had our path to the current time and reality, and I applaud your desire to make the fight home-soil focused in uncovering, exposing and analysing NZ situation. It's all important.

Looking forward to seeing more content by you as it comes along. Keep up the good work, pede.

"Discovered Q on Joe Biden's Inauguration Day" kek. Ironic, but fitting.

wwg1wga

3
Uhtred 3 points ago +3 / -0

Well struth, good to know you are an Aussie, and yeah thanks, I was at the Wellington protest for 20 days, but mostly online activism from me, Victoria has had it pretty savage based on what I read here. The most restrictive covid measures in Aussie, perhaps the world, cant remember what I exactly read but it is pretty savage.

As for new content themed on my previous comment, we'll see, I don't have enough/strong arguments yet that I can explain clearly and simply explain,.

Thanks for the chat, I'll look out for your content on the board, you have solid knowledge and understanding.

2
lovecymru 2 points ago +2 / -0

They thought she would never lose. They were and are that delusional. They’ve had power for centuries. Their pride makes them blind to their own precarious position. Trump was a bump in their smooth road to ultimate control worldwide. They can’t fathom that their own blunders are the unmaking of themselves. The explosions have started the syncopation of their implosion but they don’t realize it yet.

3
BetterNameUnfound 3 points ago +3 / -0

Wait a second. I know this isn't related to the possible drop, but I have to ask:

It seriously really is called the Unselect Committee?!

Good God, how evil-sounding can you get?! That's some Kingdom Hearts shit!

9
FractalizingIron [S] 9 points ago +9 / -0

No, sorry. That's DJT's nickname for them. I seek to honor DJT by adopting his nomenclature. Formally, they are called a "Select Committee" (see https://history.house.gov/Education/Fact-Sheets/Committees-Fact-Sheet2/)

2
BetterNameUnfound 2 points ago +2 / -0

Ah, thank you. I haven't been keeping up with the sham hearings--and judging by the TV ratings, who has?

1
FractalizingIron [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Not me.

3
MammasAlwaysRIGHT 3 points ago +3 / -0

How naive and unaware could you be to believe that this account in particular wouldn’t be debunked in an hour flat? I agree that they must have set up Cassidy with bad intel and she thought she would get ahead this way. A woman scorned…el.oh.el.

…dumb b*tch

1
FractalizingIron [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

name checks out

1
MammasAlwaysRIGHT 1 point ago +1 / -0

She’s either the plant or the information is…I’m leaning towards the latter…

3
LQri 3 points ago +3 / -0

On who she is, I agree most with your Adendum Update. She was rejected and ran to the other side, imo. Thanks also for such an intelligently stated breakdown of this drop.

3
deltadog 3 points ago +3 / -0

26 years old about to take national stage. Surely it's not because of her looks.

GOP is full of scumbags like Cruz and mark.

3
tattletalestrangler 3 points ago +3 / -0

Based on the headlines I'm seeing in the fake news:

Cassidy Hutchinson’s Testimony Should Be the End of Donald Trump

Cassidy Hutchinson is the witness America has been waiting for

'This is a bombshell': Trump aides left speechless by Hutchinson testimony

I would say that if this turns out to be false it will be another black eye for the fake news. Though surprisingly, the people who are still watching don't seem to care. It's amazing.

2
lovecymru 2 points ago +2 / -0

Just like Trump’s perfect call with Ukraine. It’s a set up. He released the transcript and eyewitness come forward to debunk her. MSM drawing attention to this adds to their discredit and the joke that is the J6 hearings

3
fuckdemswithcactus 3 points ago +3 / -0

it is unfathomable that useful idiots, so inept, have been able to create and maintain such psychological pestilence for so long...

3
FractalizingIron [S] 3 points ago +3 / -0

Well, to be honest, they haven't had much resistance for so long.... Our side has always been way, way behind the ball until 2016 came along.

1
fuckdemswithcactus 1 point ago +1 / -0

this

2
Ssue1216 2 points ago +2 / -0

Great talking point and interesting topic. Happy to see mods sticky!

2
smokenhaze 2 points ago +2 / -0

heresay evidence but a perfect example of someone not being able to stop themselves and tumbling right over the precipice

2
74nooffub 2 points ago +2 / -0

If her story was true, they would have tried to use it earlier. Weakest mic drop over ever witnessed.

2
RS34ME 2 points ago +2 / -0

When you type "Cassidy Hutchinson" into DDG search, the results give you the current MSM propaganda headline "Who is Cassidy Hutchinson?"

And most of the articles can go no further than to give her age and that she was Mark Meadows aid.

I looked up her LinkedIn account, but it's pretty bare. Not even a profile pic or other work history prior to 2019 and her school of 2015. There are some endorsements. Maybe worth looking into those relations? https://www.linkedin.com/in/cassidy-hutchinson-07b24b131/

2
Pollycracker 2 points ago +2 / -0

Guess we need to stay tuned for the result. In the meantime, good to remember: If the opposition can run with stories such as the "PEE, PEE DOSSIER" they can run with anything. It's just the brick wall they need to be concerned about, which was a lesson not learned in regard to golden showers.

2
7Nick9 2 points ago +2 / -0

Read the post from the bottom up.. Try it 👍

2
Qmulonimbus 2 points ago +2 / -0

Am I the only one who though part of the testimony was a re-telling of a West Wing episode (from the one Bartlett is shot and in the limo)??

2
ObamaSucks 2 points ago +2 / -0

Awesome Thread here. Ty OP

2
fponick 2 points ago +2 / -0

Something to consider: she’s the first person in her family to go to college—and she’s not ivy league. Christopher Newport U in Virginia. FWIW.

2
Mountaing8 2 points ago +2 / -0

Thank you for the interpretation, very probably right. So Q is telling us they are going on the offensive and it is working. Considering how the black hats have been behaving the last 6 years, they have no room for complaint.

2
RoloTomassi1723 2 points ago +3 / -1

These posts aren't on 8Kun

3
FractalizingIron [S] 3 points ago +3 / -0

This post is.

https://8kun.top/qresearch/res/16552541.html#16552853

To find the Q drops on 8 kun or 8 chan, where archived) use the links found at qanon.pub

https://qanon.pub/#4958

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
Jenmon 1 point ago +1 / -0

I wouldn't be surprised if there was some sort of payoff to Hutchinson. Remember Blasey-Ford had a Go Fund Me account set up for her after she testified against against Kavanaugh. She made over 100k.

1
photobuf 1 point ago +1 / -0

I looked briefly and cannot find anything about her parents. Anyone know who they are. Might tell us a lot.

1
SemperSupra 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well done.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
WinnerofGames 1 point ago +1 / -0

Nice

1
smartbaum 1 point ago +1 / -0

with a story so patently ridiculous that it will both redpill a lot more normies but also highlight the absolute illegitimacy and ludicrous nature of the Jan 6 premise as a whole, including the sham committee investigation?

I get the impression many normies who are still normie would still want to uncritically believe any tidbit that supports orange-man-bad, even ridiculous stories. If anyone has anecdotal or otherwise reasons to believe this J6 stuff is waking people up, I'm all ears. So far I hear the critical analyses in alt news echo chambers for the most part.

1
FractalizingIron [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

In my opinion, the normie sphere is not homogenous. There is a broad spectrum, stretching from those blissfully enraptured with the matrix to those who know something is weird, but not quite seeing any direct clues yet.

There will always be some who embrace the matrix and the nonsense. That's not going to change anytime soon. But those who are almost ready to wake up, wake up. I meet more each day. Not to mention those who have woken up 2 years ago, 1 year ago, 6 months ago.

That's my rather subjective view of this, but yes, it would be good to hear direct info on the impact of the J6 nonsense on regular normies.

1
LetErBuck 1 point ago +1 / -0

A good movie has great actors. Cassidy Hutchinson is an actress. She is a plant, saved (has not held another job since Jan 2021- odd, isn't it for a young 20 year old?) for this precise moment.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0