287

Analysis of Qdrop #4958: Who is Cassidy Hutchinson? Ask a Question, Get an Answer Q-analysis!

posted 45 days ago by FractalizingIron 45 days ago by FractalizingIron +288 / -1

What is at stake? 
Who has control?
SURPRISE WITNESS.
Who was surprised?
Who will be surprised?
Use your logic.
Can emotions be used to influence decisions?
How do you control emotion?
Define 'Plant'.
How do you insert a plant?
Can emotions be used to insert a plant?
Who is Cassidy Hutchinson?
Trust the plan.
Q

Note: Q is asking questions in order to stimulate a thinking process. Q's questions are in -Bold Italics-. (Potential) Answers indicated by "A:"

-What is at stake?-

A: The whole enchilada. The Jan 6 false flag is a bulwark against the American People discovering how deep their treason goes. That bulwark falls, and the floodgates open.

-Who has control?-

A: The Patriots have control. DJT, Q Team, Devolved Military.

-SURPRISE WITNESS.-

A: [Statement]. Indicates Cassidy.

-Who was surprised?-

A: Hmmmm. No one paying attention is surprised that the Unselect pulled a 'surprise witness' with bogus info, info that can be debunked within hours no less. So, who was surprised? Speculation the Unselect DS was surprised. As in Cassidy raised her hand, and said: "I have damning evidence on Trumpy!"

Speculation Unselected said, "Great. Let's put her up there! We need SOMETHING to distract everyone! Roe Vs Wade, etc., etc..... everything is going to shit!"

-Who will be surprised?-

A: Speculation The Unselected will be surprised (were surprised?) that 1) the evidence of the 'surprise witness' is totally bogus and easily debunked and 2) that in fact, the surprise witness was .... a plant?

-Use your logic.-

A: [Exhortation by Q to apply correct and effective thinking processes, in order to correctly decypher and understand what is going on in the situation/event being discussed.] Yes, Sir! Right away, Sir! <salutes>

-Can emotions be used to influence decisions?-

A: Yes, emotions can be used to influence decisions.

-How do you control emotion?-

A: 1) Information - true, false, partly true/false information can be used to influence emotional response, as emotions respond to conceptual constructs. 2) pressure, situational conditioning - e.g. presenting 'a massive threat' can be used to trigger fear, for example, and manipulate the desired emotional outcome. Or creating a situation where there is a desperate need, and thus, target is conditioned to respond urgently and without thinking. Or, offering something so 'juicy' that the recipient is more concerned with how it might benefit them than considering whether its true or something else is going on.

-Define 'Plant'.-

A: (Sauce: The Free Dictionary)

A person or thing put into place in order to mislead or function secretly, especially: a. A person placed in a group of spectators to influence behavior. b. A person stationed in a given location as a spy or observer. c. A misleading piece of evidence placed so as to be discovered. d. A remark or action in a play or narrative that becomes important later.

-How do you insert a plant?-

A: Many different methods might exist. One possible method is: Manipulate emotional response of target(s) by offering something tempting in a situation where great pressure is created by intense or desperate need, or by perceived massive personal gain, etc. Plant is accepted because decision making process is compromised by fear, need and desperation, or avarice and ambition.

-Can emotions be used to insert a plant?-

A: [Q is delivering a two-part pronged question. “How do you insert a plant” = question to stimulate thought direction. “Can emotions be used to insert a plant?”= question to direct reader to correct direction.] See above.

-Who is Cassidy Hutchinson?-

A: Anon Question: is Cassidy Hutchinson a plant? Is she a sacrificial pawn who agreed to go to the Jan 6 committee and offer a bogus, easily debunkable story to the Unselect Committee? Who is she? Digs on this are likely to yield important info.

EDIT: Anon (u/Serendipity8): "Cassidy worked for Meadows, Scalise and Ted Cruz, according to a bio I just read. Will try to find link".

EDIT: Alt. Is the information (story about Potus, the limo, the stranglehold, etc) the plant, offered to Hutchinson at a time when they knew she would lap it up because of her ambition?

-Trust the plan.-

A: WWG1WGA.

-Q-

A: Thank you, Q.

Possible interpretation: Is Q asking us to consider that in fact, Hutchinson is a plant inserted by the Q team in order to misdirect and subvert the Unselected Jan 6 Committee? Is it possible that, using the timing of the Supreme Court decisions, which have put incredible pressure on the DEMS, Deep State, Q team manipulated their emotional condition to have them recklessly and foolishly accept the plant of Hutchinson with a story so patently ridiculous that it will both redpill a lot more normies but also highlight the absolute illegitimacy and ludicrous nature of the Jan 6 premise as a whole, including the sham committee investigation?

Q finishing up with "Trust the Plan" feels like a confirmation that the Surprise Witness was part of Q work (aka the Plan), but that's just a feeling (that's a rather subjective interpretation)

Alternative Interpretation: Cassidy Hutchinson was a plant from the DS, into the Republican ranks, and eventually into the WH, in wait for such a time as this. However, if Hutchinson is DS plant, how does that make sense in the context of all Q's questions here? Was Hutchinson perhaps a white hat plant to the DS rank and file from way back? A sort of double agent, pretending to be DS sympathizer but in fact, inserted by the White Hats a good time back?

*Addendum: additional speculation; Q is simply messing with the DS Unselect, trolling them into thinking that Hutchinson was a plant.

Addendum (Update): By all looks and appearances, it seems that Cassidy Hutchinson is a rather sad case of someone wanting to get ahead, and then being spurned (reportedly she wanted to staff at Mar A Lago, but was rejected by DJT due to being mediocre at best) decided to become a witness to the Unselect Jan 6. (see: Bannon Interview with Joanna Miller – Former WH Senior Policy Analyst (see also: Bannon War Room discussion re: Hutchinson's testimony between Bannon, Ephshteyn, and Posobeic first 15 minutes

Is it possible that Hutchinson's emotions were manipulated and used in order to plant this lameass story in her, by the WH Deputy Chief of Staff and Head of SS, who she apparently heard this story from? Did they set her up, knowing she would likely, at the right time, spill the beans? Was she the set up? Meaning that the story was the plant, Hutchinson herself not the plant but the soil in which the plant was planted? That seems plausible given the apparently sad nature of this woman's character....

Final Edit: Jury is still out whether this or that or the other is in fact Q. This analysis done on the (unproven) premise that the drop is legit from Q, and will obviously be null and void should that eventually prove not to be the case.

Q1842:

-"Never Interfere With an Enemy While He’s in the Process of Destroying Himself."-

121 comments

121 comments share save hide report block hide child comments

Comments (121)

sorted by:

▲ 50 ▼

– Fefifofumdrum 50 points 45 days ago +51 / -1

Nicely done OP.

This Hutchinson thing will, for all its bluster and unsubstantiated fluff, have an disproportionately large impact on how the country negatively views the democrats.

She was a nail in the coffin, used to discredit the entire J6 thing, and people everywhere are rolling their eyes.

I hope she has been paid well enough to disappear for awhile.

permalink save report block reply

▲ 13 ▼

– Magpi 13 points 45 days ago +13 / -0

I agree. Just when you think the Dems can sink no further, along comes another stooge.

And I'm guessing when the Dems are done with her, she'll "disappear" forever.