Immediately upon setting their new password, anons were provided two Q/POTUS deltas with consecutive tweets by Trump.
Then in the next drops Q posted a photo of a watch at 1:29 and re-shared a ‘Justice’ marker from December 9 2017.
Then on December 9, 2019 at exactly 1:29 the IG report was published by the DOJ Twitter account, and at the same moment statements by AG Barr and John Durham were posted to their respective Twitter accounts. Also worth reminding that the IG report revealed 17 errors/commissions in the Carter Page FISA.
If I were Q, I'd probably plan something even more impressive than this for my return after an 18-month period of absence
This is a very good point. It would have been trivial for Q to assuage any doubts immediately before the first post. A couple DJT zero deltas with a "trip_id" post first would have made it difficult to deny.
Instead we got:
Shall we play a game once more?
But it's not "a game." We aren't "playing a game." Without surrounding context this sounds juvenile to me and very much not Q.
On the contrary, Q said numerous times:
THIS IS NOT A GAME.
Whenever Q said, "shall we play a game?" there was surrounding context for what "the game" was. It wasn't the whole thing, but some specific event that was "game like" because of the other actors involved.
I'm not saying it's impossible, or not true, or not Q. I am just not convinced, yet Q has always been quite convincing. That alone makes me sus.
I need more, we all need more, we are not getting more. This whole thing is sus.
The most disturbing thing to me about the new drops is that 'Q' told anons to "Remember your oath".
No military leader would ever insult their subordinates in this way by calling into question their loyalty to the constitution.
When Q used this expression in the past it was directed at specific people within government who they knew to have been witness to or complicit in traitorous activity. This was Q's way of encouraging them to cooperate/testify in order to redeem themselves and their agency.
The way in which this expression was used in a recent 'Q' drop is incredibly ignorant and a terrible insult to the patriots who dedicate their time to The Great Awakening. But whoever wrote the drops is too dumb to even realize that and they think they're being clever re-hashing Q's previous expressions.
Immediately upon setting their new password, anons were provided two Q/POTUS deltas with consecutive tweets by Trump.
Then in the next drops Q posted a photo of a watch at 1:29 and re-shared a ‘Justice’ marker from December 9 2017.
Then on December 9, 2019 at exactly 1:29 the IG report was published by the DOJ Twitter account, and at the same moment statements by AG Barr and John Durham were posted to their respective Twitter accounts. Also worth reminding that the IG report revealed 17 errors/commissions in the Carter Page FISA.
Graphic for watch / IG report proof: https://media.128ducks.com/file_store/11e2ceaa317a41640f3b091e6538a0ceffb2e55d3de337ee73d493f7b5730926.png
Q referred to this as their "calling shot".
If I were Q, I'd probably plan something even more impressive than this for my return after an 18-month period of absence…
This is a very good point. It would have been trivial for Q to assuage any doubts immediately before the first post. A couple DJT zero deltas with a "trip_id" post first would have made it difficult to deny.
Instead we got:
But it's not "a game." We aren't "playing a game." Without surrounding context this sounds juvenile to me and very much not Q.
On the contrary, Q said numerous times:
Whenever Q said, "shall we play a game?" there was surrounding context for what "the game" was. It wasn't the whole thing, but some specific event that was "game like" because of the other actors involved.
I'm not saying it's impossible, or not true, or not Q. I am just not convinced, yet Q has always been quite convincing. That alone makes me sus.
I need more, we all need more, we are not getting more. This whole thing is sus.
The most disturbing thing to me about the new drops is that 'Q' told anons to "Remember your oath".
No military leader would ever insult their subordinates in this way by calling into question their loyalty to the constitution.
When Q used this expression in the past it was directed at specific people within government who they knew to have been witness to or complicit in traitorous activity. This was Q's way of encouraging them to cooperate/testify in order to redeem themselves and their agency.
The way in which this expression was used in a recent 'Q' drop is incredibly ignorant and a terrible insult to the patriots who dedicate their time to The Great Awakening. But whoever wrote the drops is too dumb to even realize that and they think they're being clever re-hashing Q's previous expressions.
It's about the new 2A law ... stay tuned ... not good