The Jesuit story is one of those areas that is so murky it is hard to understand what really happened. I tend to side with the theory that they are the group that infiltrated and corrupted the Masons. The Masons were originally established in the early 1700's to counter the unacceptable political control of the Vatican. It was thought at the time a non denominational order could thwart the Catholic church's attempts to interfere in politics.
The Jesuits were then tasked to corrupt the values of this organization and bring it back into the dark fold of the pope. There is no denying that Clement XII hated the Masons, but it doesn't make sense why this would be the case unless they were a direct threat to his power.
People on this forum often ask how could George Washington and all our founding fathers could have been Freemasons. I tend to think that the answer lies in the fact the Masons were not completely evil back in that time. The Jesuits don't appear to have become involved with Freemasonry until around 1750, and it does take some time to thoroughly integrate and corrupt an organization.
When this is all over, and the true history of the Vatican is exposed, I will be very curious to understand what really happened here. Until then, all we can do is speculate as to the motivations of the various parties involved.
They infiltrated the protestants also and corrupted them with "rapture" and "future antichrist" doctrine, when in fact, the "vicor of Christ" aka the pope is the office of antichrist and every pope is the antichrist and they are preparing the world for a false antichrist, using the fake state of Israel, fake temple etc, which they created and will try to create, only to then have /theirguy/ to swoop in after 7 years and claim to be the messiah and execute those who wont believe in him. Daniel's 70 weeks was all fulfilled by Jesus but they claim the "prince who shall come and put an end to sacrifices and oblations" is the antichrist (big kek)
The Jesuit story is one of those areas that is so murky it is hard to understand what really happened. I tend to side with the theory that they are the group that infiltrated and corrupted the Masons. The Masons were originally established in the early 1700's to counter the unacceptable political control of the Vatican. It was thought at the time a non denominational order could thwart the Catholic church's attempts to interfere in politics.
The Jesuits were then tasked to corrupt the values of this organization and bring it back into the dark fold of the pope. There is no denying that Clement XII hated the Masons, but it doesn't make sense why this would be the case unless they were a direct threat to his power.
People on this forum often ask how could George Washington and all our founding fathers could have been Freemasons. I tend to think that the answer lies in the fact the Masons were not completely evil back in that time. The Jesuits don't appear to have become involved with Freemasonry until around 1750, and it does take some time to thoroughly integrate and corrupt an organization.
When this is all over, and the true history of the Vatican is exposed, I will be very curious to understand what really happened here. Until then, all we can do is speculate as to the motivations of the various parties involved.
They infiltrated the protestants also and corrupted them with "rapture" and "future antichrist" doctrine, when in fact, the "vicor of Christ" aka the pope is the office of antichrist and every pope is the antichrist and they are preparing the world for a false antichrist, using the fake state of Israel, fake temple etc, which they created and will try to create, only to then have /theirguy/ to swoop in after 7 years and claim to be the messiah and execute those who wont believe in him. Daniel's 70 weeks was all fulfilled by Jesus but they claim the "prince who shall come and put an end to sacrifices and oblations" is the antichrist (big kek)
Spoken like a Freemason. They make war on the Papacy at all costs. How does it feel to be their bedfellow, goy?