Always be skeptical when you hear extraordinary claims like this. Who is the person saying them, and what are his motivations? Every high school chemistry student knows that water has a pH of 7, which means it will spontaneously dissociate into an equal number of OH- and H30+ molecules, to the tune of about 10^-7 per mole. (For those who don't remember, pH is the negative log of the hydrogen ion concentration in a solution.) When you hear him say H3O2, you should immediately think H20+OH(-).
The fact that he doesn't mention this well known fact or get into the physics of what is occurring is a big red flag. The next major red flag here is that this is a 10 year old talk, and nothing has come of it. Why? If there was something to this, there would be dozens of companies looking at how to turn this into a profitable venture. No, it isn't some big conspiracy to prevent free energy.The stackexchange link above gives many interesting details for those looking to know more, but one interesting point is the phase diagram of water showing 11 known phases of water. Not 3. When he mentioned that there was a mysterious "fourth" phase that immediately raised my bullshit meter to high. Nobody seriously studying water would make a blunder like this. We've known for decades there were many more than 3 phases of water.
I don't think the guy is a fraud per se, but he sounds like someone trying to get research grants and investors to pay for something which he himself realizes probably won't go anywhere. He presents this in a way clearly geared towards those who are likely to be easily misled into believing that this is some kind of mysterious breakthrough, rather than simply an interesting alignment of H20 and OH- ions forming in some kind of structured pattern in the presence of gel.
I haven't watched this vid yet, but anyone who studies alchemy will know how complex water actually is, and very few people know even a fraction of what it really is.
None of the below should be taken to mean I don't think water is an amazing substance that may still hold deep mysteries. But...
https://chemistry.stackexchange.com/questions/5925/ez-water-fraud-or-breakthrough
Always be skeptical when you hear extraordinary claims like this. Who is the person saying them, and what are his motivations? Every high school chemistry student knows that water has a pH of 7, which means it will spontaneously dissociate into an equal number of OH- and H30+ molecules, to the tune of about 10^-7 per mole. (For those who don't remember, pH is the negative log of the hydrogen ion concentration in a solution.) When you hear him say H3O2, you should immediately think H20+OH(-).
The fact that he doesn't mention this well known fact or get into the physics of what is occurring is a big red flag. The next major red flag here is that this is a 10 year old talk, and nothing has come of it. Why? If there was something to this, there would be dozens of companies looking at how to turn this into a profitable venture. No, it isn't some big conspiracy to prevent free energy.The stackexchange link above gives many interesting details for those looking to know more, but one interesting point is the phase diagram of water showing 11 known phases of water. Not 3. When he mentioned that there was a mysterious "fourth" phase that immediately raised my bullshit meter to high. Nobody seriously studying water would make a blunder like this. We've known for decades there were many more than 3 phases of water.
I don't think the guy is a fraud per se, but he sounds like someone trying to get research grants and investors to pay for something which he himself realizes probably won't go anywhere. He presents this in a way clearly geared towards those who are likely to be easily misled into believing that this is some kind of mysterious breakthrough, rather than simply an interesting alignment of H20 and OH- ions forming in some kind of structured pattern in the presence of gel.
I haven't watched this vid yet, but anyone who studies alchemy will know how complex water actually is, and very few people know even a fraction of what it really is.
Agreed.
Viktor Schauberger in the 1930's.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yXPrLGUGZsw&t=2s
Rene Quinton's seawater treatments.
https://www.panakosaguademar.com/post/rene-quinton-and-the-seawater-chronology-of-their-relationship
Prof Bernd Kroeplin
https://www.weltimtropfen.de/forschung_hintergrund_english.html