Anyone who's interested in this should check out John Levi videos. Sorry it's YouTube but he clearly spells out the great resets that have occurred and how our so called history is a total lie.
I see Neo-classical design that was made popular during enlightenment. Also eight columns, which has meaning for Chinese people, as it is seen as a lucky number.
Somewhere between. The brutalist was really ugly, all square, no ornaments. This one still has columns. It seems like something designed for efficiency, but columns were added so it would be somewhat ornamental. Maybe the architect was trying to make something that looked "western" but didn't have all the background to pull it off.
Duh. Because they are built to last, with lots of stone. Tell me - why are the pyramids still standing? Very suspicious, seeing as they are more than 6000 years old, if you ask me.
Masons were originally a guild of stonemasons that had very high standards with extremely long apprenticeships, so that they could build cathedrals and other important buildings. This developed into a ceremonial version - that we all love to hate - a secret society. In any case, important buildings such as central banks needed the perception of stability and trust, so Yeah, maybe consult that freemasonic architect who is conversant with stone. (Try and find such an architect today - you won't - they only build ridiculous concrete and steel structures, not stone ones, but that's another story)
Your theory may have something to it though, the fact that freemasons occupied powerful positions. And as we know, power corrupts absolutely.
The very top
Capstone may have been gold, it has been removed. Lots of people assume the pyramids were a power-plant, i prefer the more realistic theory that they are giant water purifiers.
The great stonemasons of the world have lost the ability to recreate what we see in the grand cathedrals and capitol buildings found world wide. It's another red flag to add to OP's post.
I guess for theorizing, we could start with modern equipment, then work backwards in time from there. Should be "easy" enough to build a modest cathedral with cranes and everything else. It of course gets real interesting when you don't have those to build with.
Have a look at the "veiled sculptures" carved from single pieces of granite. These miraculous artworks are absolutely impossible to create today. By anyone...
I agree. It's been done many times. One example I'm well aware of is the attempted moving of the stones used to build Nan Madol, a place I've personally explored. Actually was lucky enough to have had a meeting with Micronesia's leading archeologist Mauricio Rufino while I was there. The "re-creators" failed dismally to move 5 ton stones on their boats (using modern equipment). But the official narrative states that stones up to 50 tons were moved and lifted into place via boat...
If you knew about ley lines, would you not take advantage of them if you recognised the possibility of taking that advantage? Or are we now going to argue the science (or lack of it) of ley lines? There are arguments made, that the pyramids are on ley lines. Are they then therefore evil?
Or are you suggesting that freemasons were copying? But of course they were, that was the whole point of long apprenticeships etc. And yes, I am sure they studied ley lines. They were all for mimicking such ancient knowledge.
I am not sure what you are driving at. The problem is that on the one hand, there are the physical buildings, which were drawn up as architectural drawings etc. On the other, is the meaning that is inferred upon those buildings.
As I stated in a realist manner, the building is neo-classical - and yes, that is mimicking a far older style. Neo-classicism was about reviving what was perceived as the* golden ages* of ancient Romans and Greeks. Many people travelled to observe those ancient structures, because they were still there, and this was seen as the correct way to build. Hence the columns to hold up the parapets.
I think you are driving at the meanings of the neo-classical style - again, one has to remember that neo-classicism gave birth to the US constitution, and yes freemasons had a hand, but are you gonna tell me now that George Washington was an evil man? Get outtahere.
Nukes destroy at the impact zone, but leave some building standing, if they are strong enough. It just depends how close the bullding is to that impact zone, and how strong it is. An observatory was left standing at Hiroshima., is it therefore now a symbol of evil? This is absolutist thinking that does not help.
Yes, nukes are bad. Destruction like that is heart-breaking, but lets not equate surviving buildings with all the evil in the world.
Also, on the subject of generalization, I know many freemasons as well as rotary club and lions club members (offshoots) who put their free time into community projects. Are they evil? For example a man who took on a community project that was slated to cost 150000 dollars - they had already hired a contractor. He managed the project to completion with only 12000 dollars, while delivering the value that was required (installing a concrete barbecue). He uncovered the most disgusting public service corruption, and quietly saved our community from a hideous expense. Yes there is evil in the world, but please don't generalize.
That's such a wild jump to make. "Some of these buildings share similar styles therefore the elites committed planetary-wide genocide a little over a century ago and were able to cover that up with nary a peep from the people who were moved into those abandoned places."
How in the hell would none of this have been passed on to those peoples' descendants? The 19th century wasn't that long ago, there's no way this would have been completely kept quiet.
Wait till you see the die off that's coming from the death shots. Then you'll start to understand how the "elites" achieved their previous "great resets".
We've had several resets whether it's mud flood or some sort of melting event. People in horse and buggy on dirt roads definitely didn't build these elaborate buildings in the 1800s. They were simply inheritors. Our entire history is a lie
How old are you? Late 1800s were not that long ago. Some of us have grandparents alive back then and would have said something.
Ancient megalithic structures, on the other hand, like Egyptian pyramids...That's where the lies are.
It is interesting to me that we're taught to believe that we've existed for thousands of years with relatively little progress, then all of a sudden, we figured out electricity, trains, cars, planes, telephones, radio, etc within the span of about 150-200 years....
There is a good book about that fair. The structures were largely plaster coated buildings made to last for the short duration of the fair. If left to age on their own, they would have failed within a couple years.
That’s the official narrative. Just like “vaccines are safe and effective” is also the official narrative.
The Palace of Fine Arts, San Fransisco World’s Fair still stands today for example.
Let’s say other World’s Fairs were built out of plaster and wood though: even then, the construction of such gargantuan structures exhibited at Chicago’s Columbian Exposition would have been impossible with horse and cart and the labour force available.
Let’s take it a step further: how perchance would the colossal canals lined with masonry have been dug for that fair alone? Horse and cart?
How about the gigantic statue standing in the middle of the canal?
Then there’s the waterworks and associated plumbing required for the massive elaborate fountains. Blokes with shovels, picks, chisels and horse and cart constructed all that for a 6 month fair only to destroy it?
The OFFICIAL NARRATIVE is being exposed here on this forum daily. This topic is but another one.
We have collectively been lied to about pretty much everything regarding history, science, medicine, politics...
Interesting how the crook and charlatan Thomas Edison gets a mention in the book synopsis but the actual mastermind of the Chicago "White City" Exposition's lighting and electricity, Nikola Tesla, does not...
I'm sorry fren, this book is an extension of the the official narrative, albeit in fictional form. Whilst I haven't read it I've known about it for a while. It's a common theme in the promotion of official narrative lies. Leo Tolstoy did this also in his lengthy tangent chapters in his epic War and Peace. A little bit of truth sprinkled in between more than generous heapings of propaganda "history".
The book isn't fiction. The author meticulously researches his material before writing them. He gets newspapers, diaries, letters, etc. from the people alive and involved with the subject he writes about. I read his book about Churchill during the year+ that London, and other cities, were bombed. Truly amazing to read! My wife, as a civil engineer, would have caught anything that didn't make engineering sense.
"Enlightenment" started in the late 17th century. But it drew heavily from Roman architecture and they ruled the world from England to Persia until the 400s AD. Having built so well that we still have roads and aqueducts from then, it would be natural to mimic them.
Built HOW? This is the point. Hammers, chisels, horse and cart, no cranes. Giant blocks. Huge statues atop massive structures. And then there's the GARGANTUAN domes. Haga Sophia in Turkey is a great example of the ludicrousness of the official narrative that anyone over long periods of time can simply build such things.
Look on YouTube. There are explanations which actually have an engineering basis and have been tried in real life. Why do you think no one thought of cranes, ramps, rollers, making use of water or sand to slide stones, making concrete by gluing rock dust and pebbles? If you were a slave and knew the rest of your life would be spent carving and moving a couple of stone blocks, would you sit down and call for supernatural help, or would you think "A lever would totally make this easier."? Splitting stone now is done as in ancient times but with better equipment: make a groove or hole and expand it or saw it.
You do not understand where I’m coming from mate. I’m reiterating the ludicrousness of the official narrative. There’s NO WAY slaves built the mega structures of the past. Time to expand your thinking, open your eyes, and open your mind.
Yeah I don't quite understand OP's point. There are many impressive buildings that were built before the 19th century going back to medieval times. What exactly is the theory here?
I think he is just mentioning we have clearly lived through another Great Reset and the history was hidden and re-written and were we clearly the inheritors of a great civilization's structural remains that spanned the entire world with the same stone building styles.
See, I've looked into the whole Tartaria thing some time ago and I felt like there was a whole lot of jumping to wild conclusions based on little evidence. Maybe the documentary wasn't well done or I'm just daft but I simply couldn't understand what exactly the theory was beyond "there was mudfloods at some point therefore all of history is a lie and they actually wore wigs in the 18th century as a defense against energy weapons." I'm not even kidding.
I can understand that they lie about history, of course they do. We see them twist facts all the time. But does that suggest that literally nothing happened like they say it does? Does that mean there was no civil war (like that documentary claimed)? I think some people start to discover they've been lying to us and then use that as an excuse to toss out everything.
I'd need to see a lot more compelling evidence before I gave the Tartaria stuff any more credence.
I’m not sure of the specific documentary you’re referring to as I haven’t seen one with the (wig theory) but I do think something still yet to be explained happen to a vast majority of the earth and causes rapidly changing climates.
I think fact of the Desert wasteland in Africa, the 200 foot cliffs of ice in Antarctica, the rapid growth of the Amazon in South America are all prove of the drastic changes in climate over a relatively short period.
I think that’s why the DS are so concerned with climate change as they might be trying to replicate a past event.
My theory is during that last change Oceans shifted and/or Lands liquefied (mud floods) which caused buildings to be sunken or destroyed and during this time the Tartarian Empire was decimated and history was rewritten. Technologies were hidden By the NEW Ruling Elites, maps were destroyed or hidden (The Vatican) and certain building were to advanced to destroy or “current” technology to explain, therefore they were covered with simple architecture or written off as these ‘spectacular structures’.
I think nukes are not what we were told and that could be what causes the Liquefication of the soil, shifts in the Oceans, melting of rock (granite). Japan was a test of what the elites were able to recreate.
I don’t know, There could be truths in the above or it could all be the rambling theories of a crazed person. Lol.
Future proves Past
The Deep State is using the same play book
The White Hats know their moves and have prepared counter moves
There are plenty of families who have written diary-type records going back to the 1700's, and perhaps some in Europe even longer. Have any of them reported such a significant thing happening, other than the Revolutionary War, War of 1812, Civil War, WWI and WWII?
I have difficulty with this notion as well. Written & verbal accounts should mention these. But I have seen some amazing architecture from centuries ago that I'm amazed we could do without powered tools & machinery. Then you have sites like Giza, Puma Punku, Machu Pichu where they were definitely built by a lost civiization and lost tetechnology.
But, think how easy they shift the narrative at a time where information sharing and spreading is much easier with cellphones, & internet. The history books will write Biden won the election, Trump was a racist, Covid killed millions. That's with hundreds of millions of people knowing that is a lie, but it will still be the narrative for the future.
Now think how easy it was to control that information a hundred yrs ago and then 500 yrs ago.
Who's to say they didn't have tech that was potentially more advanced than we have today? How would we know? Who's to say that scrying mirrors weren't the iphones of the day? History is written by the victors, the controllers...
Edit to add: This time it's different I feel. This time we've been given a shot at defeating the controllers, the DS, the cabal, the demons. AND We The People ARE clearly winning! Thanks to Q!
From what I understand the Tartaria theorists just claim those are fabricated which is why I have difficulty taking them seriously. Apparently all of these bits of evidence were made up by the elites or something. It's just too far-fetched for me.
Not disagreeing but I don't think flood in the same manner as you are. It was a flood that involved the shifting of large bodies of water as the African Dessert is proof of but it also caused the soil to liquefy and ancient buildings to sink below grade (Mudflood Theory)
Right, it wasn't just a lot of rain, the atmosphere and geography of the whole world changed. Water burst out of the core of the earth. It never even rained before the flood.
There's a dude named Trey Smith on YT who does really good biblical documentaries. One of them is about the flood and how the antediluvian world would have looked before it happened. I do think it's worth a watch and probably explains a lot of that stuff without needing the mudflood theory to be true.
Alot of it has to do with the idea that we are living in a post invasion world. Essentially, when Christ returned from Heaven ~60-80 AD the thousand year reign occurred on Earth. Then around the late 1800s, Satan was unbound and allowed on Earth. It is an alternative explanation as to the dystopic nature of the world we live in. Tie in the Cabal and their need to traffic and sacrifice humans to different demonic effigies....resets make sense and Satan would love to be deceitful and hide evidence of Christ's accomplishments for Earth.
The Greeks invented Dorian, Corinthian, and Ionic columns along with a host of other architectural breakthroughs.
The Romans copied and expanded upon the Greeks discoveries. The Europeans copied and expanded upon the Romans. And so on the pattern continues.
So of course you will see revisioned column work althroughout history. Another anon mentioned the neoclassical period brought about during the Renaissance, and that is exactly what you are seeing.
And it's no secret that the founding fathers viewed America as a sort of new Rome and thus borrowed their architecture as an inspiration for our own. I think some people start going down the rabbit hole, learn that we've been lied to all of our lives and then start concluding everything is therefore a conspiracy where a more simple explanation suffices.
Agreed. Another problem many in our ranks have is blindly trusting rando streamers who claim all of this outlandish shit with little to no empirical evidence.
I can remember many slow (or none at all) Q drop days where the PSB24/7 stream would discuss crap like the mud flood. At it's height, that was a channel that had 100,000+ Q followers and researchers subscribed (assuming YT didn't suppress their sub/view counts).
So that's 100K of us that on dead drop days might've listened to Radix, Thumper, and Deadcat ramble on adnausem, hypothesizing about these type of rabbit holes.
In all honesty, it feels a bit like the flat Earth psyop. Purely distraction, used as a discrediting example against the community for the normies to label us as they are instructed to do so (programming). Im not doubting much of history has been covered up, rewritten, or even lost. But this whole impossible architecture narrative is incredibly weak to my perception. Glad others here can logically see the numerous holes in these convoluted theories.
See, I feel like there's actually much more compelling evidence for flat Earth than there is for the Tartaria theories. Whether that itself is ultimately nonsense or not is besides the point. I'm someone who is genuinely open-minded and willing to entertain the possibility that everything I've been taught is free-game. I don't think anything should be off limits as far as asking questions goes. If nothing else I find these ideas to be fun thought experiments!
That being said, I'm not just dismissing mudfloods/Tartaria out of hand because it goes against what I've been taught. I've actually looked into it myself and I just really didn't find the theory that convincing. I do think mudfloods have happened but that doesn't mean they were deliberately engineered as a planetary scale genocide or whatever. And the observation that buildings in different countries share similar styles of architecture isn't even that difficult to explain. Conventional history about Europeans borrowing their Renaissance styles from antiquity is not exactly that mind-bending.
To me this just seems like a simple occam's razor affair.
Simple. Evolution of architecture into modern design. Out with the old, in with the new methodology.
As for California and Chicago, I cannot say as Im not versed in the events surrounding those cities. But, given that both were disasters with high casualties and infrastructure destruction, one might consider they bricked over entire areas where there was massive loss of life and there was nothing to salvage as far as sublevel infrastructure.
So basically like dozers used in the world wars to build mass graves, the respective cities you mentioned perhaps literally buried the dead. Bricking them in, a form of mausoleum. Most wouldve been charred remains anyhow.
At work, will definitely look later though, thank you!
I would be remiss if not to remind you though, CA was developed many years before the gold rush. The Spanish had been there for quite some time establishing many elaborate buildings and settlements. One of those being the SF area. Very comparable to other Spanish colonies throughout the Americas and Caribbean.
Reading through that, one person claims that it's impossible to construct those types of buildings even now. Really? Is it that it's impossible or rather that the elites choose not to, instead opting to lean into brutalist architecture to create a sense of oppression? How many of these people making these claims are architects and not just speaking out of their ass?
You are overlooking the fact that by the time the gold rush in California happened, the Spanish had been colonizing California since the 16th century and had built a highway system, El Camino Real, which is now a modern road but still there. There was shipping activity at the natural ports of San Diego, Monterey, and San Francisco. It wasn't the frontier. The Oregon Trail brought plenty of people from the east. There were railroads all over the place. And as to craftsmanship, there are and have always been very few artists of Michaelangelo calibre, but they were there. No need to postulate aliens or whatever. It's just hard to get really good when the average lifespan is only about 45, most people die first.
Because it is fantastically expensive now to quarry and work stone. Ask Trump. He is famous for a few marble floors and buildings. Also, marble stains and pits and takes upkeep. Modern resin composites are easier. (why didn't these ancient civilizations do that, if they were so sophisticated?). Granite lasts much better than marble, but is even harder to work and match and not as common. That makes a granite building much more of a prestige project. All stone is heavy compared to steel and concrete and you can't build very high, modern cities require a different construction. Most buildings used to have basements for cool storage, and coal storage, and when new buildings were built they often went over older ones--look at Seattle for a better example. Or Troy. Great fires do not burn stone. That's why the old stone things lasted a long time. Red brick is a cheap alternative and easy to do on site, whereas stone work requires a quarry somewhere and someone to haul the stones.
They want to believe that humans are weak, lazy, unimaginative, helpless, and that their lives are controlled by evil sinister forces, I think. So they have turned to fables.
I have architectural background and still work in construction, Have for decades. I 100% support OP's opinions because I've not only had much first hand experience but have also devoted many years and 1000s of hours of research into this topic.
If it's "fantastically expensive now to quarry and work stone" with the heavy machinery and high tech precision equipment available, how on Earth are we to believe the relatively "primitive" peoples of the past were able to achieve their architectural endeavours?
That is why we don't build such stone things, except for very rich people, and back then it was the same. Very rich people were calling the shots. Like kings. And if you want to see how-to. You Tube is full of many, many theories. Everything from showing how ordinary people used their muscles and brains and time to find away, to all the nihilistic "people can't do anything so it must have been aliens." Geez. How you are insulting thousands of people over thousands of years, saying that.
Calm down mate. The way the mega constructions were achieved in the past is a mystery. You stating how it was done via the rich people/ kings shows ignorance, not knowledge. All theories. We DON’T know. Who said aliens? Not me! Me stating “Relatively primitive” refers to the official narrative sheesh lol.
Lol, that's like the inverse of Clarke's dictum that "any science sufficiently advanced is indistinguishable from magic." And therefore, if the science is not advanced enough, magic can not be distinguished from reality.
So ridiculous some of these theories. Perfect example is the claim that throughout Europe there must've been a flood because of the raised main structures of so many Euro towns....
Hello people! Wake up! If your city was destroyed by mechanized warfare, the common practice was to raise the streets above existing foundations that could be salvaged. This was done to fix sewer/water infrastructure and utilities first, then you can begin on rebuilding the actual destroyed buildings.
This is what the Soviets did althroughout the USSR and it's very noticable to anyone who has frequented any of the large city centres that were war torn. The Russians had their style and methods for rebuilding. As did the French, Italians, Dutch, etc.
Here's a couple of quickies links as Im just about to leave for work. I should have some better stuff bookmarked on my PC, but it may not be in English language. I will make a note to check after my shift today!
From my understanding, the raising of the street level methodology was also mostly done in lower elevation and coastal areas. I am most familiar with Riga LV, and this makes perfect sense as the city is built in a bay which is the mouth to the countries river systems. But the Russians were notorious for using copy/pasta building methods. Some were good, say the trains and electrical grids. Some were awful, bloc housing and bridge design for example.
So that being said, a local example for me would be Riga compared to Vilinus. Vilinus is not coastal nor a lower elevation than Riga. Yet the USSR approached rebuilding (and yes elevating certain areas) the exact same way.
Dig adequate trenches where the streets were. Lay sub structure and utilities. Cover it up, then start working on the bombed out buildings themselves. Many got the cookie cutter soviet rebuild design, but obviously salvageable buildings were rebuilt in the same design pre war. This was done for a few reasons, the main one being time one can assume.
Tartards have tied their brains in pretzel knots trying to explain some pretty basic stuff as a worldwide genocide that somehow hasn't been passed down orally by our great-great-great grandparents. I mean if a genocide of that scale had really taken place in the 19th century surely some of that would have been passed on here and there. Remember the 1800s weren't really that long ago in the grand scale of things though it may seem like the distant past to us.
Why have I never heard of this before like 2 years ago?
i Love this post! Tartars don't get the recognition they deserve. It is living proof the victories write the history. Sad US Schools don't teach The TRUE World History!
the calendar change yes, the invention of Charlemagne, basically the dark ages are made up which is equivalent to a missing and/or fabricated 297 years . I am not completely convinced one way or the other, but it does come across quite interesting as a proposal, and given how many lies and fake history that is out there, it might be something else to consider.
Thanks for posting this. My favourite topic. Don’t have time to go through all comments, gotta go to work. Look forward to contributing more later. These buildings truly are the elephant in the architecture room. The official narrative is a joke.
Isn't it interesting how all these amazing structures, all with similar designs, all over the planet, were supposedly erected in the mid-late 1800s by people who barely had the tools and the skills to make simple dwellings?
It's the most obvious in Australia. At that time there were very few convicts there who had any sort of skills, and yet these world-class cathedrals and government buildings were all built there within a span of 50 years.
On an excursion in 2006, I found a solid porcelain glazed hand of a statue buried in the side of a creek bed in Forest Park, St. Louis, the site of the WF 1904. There is nothing temporary about it. Most of the buildings that were "built for the purpose of the fair" only to be destroyed, were buried within the boundaries of the massive park. The Ferris Wheel axle has yet to be found. I believe these buildings existed way before 1904 and the Expos were a way to fool the gen pop. Jon Levi is excellent at explaining it all. The StL Art Museum still exists and it is a stunning fixture on a huge hill. There is no way people with horse and cart transported massive slabs of granite through muddy roads. Trains, perhaps? But not wagons as we are led to believe.
I still can’t wrap my mind around it, and I’ve come to accept a lot of things as truths. Who built them? Where did they go? Where they simply abandoned? Where are the historical records? The documentation of their discovery out in the middle of nowhere? Mud floods, how? How many of these are there/were?
The who, what, where, why, and how doesn’t add up!
Yes it's very interesting and intriguing. The main falicy I've witnessed is many conversations getting sidelined by either mentioning tartaria or mud floods. Stay away from both, and just concentrate on the architecture, population density at the claimed time of building and the tools available or not available at the time. Something definitely doesn't add up, but I can't tell you exactly what that is yet. It's interesting how the same style buildings are found literally in every country and in countries that clearly have their own building style that doesn't resemble the Greco-Roman style found everywhere. The Chicago world fair of 1893 had electric... and several major engineering feats that cannot be explained if commissioned to be built in only 2 years... particularly the water features, and absolutely massive buildings. Same with world fair in Philly. All done with horse and buggy? There's just no way, and no way it was done in the timeframe mentioned. In addition to this, just coming off a civil war, where did all the money come from, AND, who in their right mind would have thought it was a good idea to hemorage money for buildings that are only temporary? Again, something doesn't quite add up... and there's plenty more mysteries, like orphan trains and incubator babies... where did THEY come from? Lots of questions... not many answers.
You can't tell me people in horse and buggy on dirt roads built these elaborate buildings. They were simply inheritors after a great reset. History as we've been told is a lie. Not too surprising considering the movie we're living through now. Jon Levi on YouTube does some really good research on our false history looking at old buildings and unexplainable
" natural " structures.
Mud flood makes no sense. These no way there wouldn’t be any kind of surviving account or crummy old photographs of such a catastrophe as recent as the 1800’s, even if they tried to wipe the record books clean.
Older civilizations were definitely buried by something. It's evident by some of our buildings today and plenty of underground cities have been discovered including my in my home town. Wasn't aware of Formenko. Who are they?
Taiwan was a fishing community until the Kuo Min Tang moved there to escape Mao's communism. The KMT were supported by the USA, because their views were seen as moderate, until the USA decided to change their minds and support Mao instead, because he was winning. That's when they had to run.
My point is that this happened in the early part of the 20th century. However, the building is hearkening to neo-classicism, which was still popular in that era.
...Yes? Why can't they be? It's an ancient style of architecture known throughout all of the world. Expert masons built them and are worldwide, why is that so unfathomable?
If it's a symbol of their power & control over the whole world, why not? I can perfectly see a controlling elite seeking to plant status symbols of their domination in every country in the world while the rest of us live in squalor, yes. I wouldn't put it past them.
But sure, you can believe whatever you want to believe regardless of how logical or not.
That's fine, I respect your right to have that opinion. I'm not saying I definitively know the answer to that but I simply find it more likely that the elites have used the masons to construct symbols of their authority rather than they stole it from some super-advanced civilization that they managed to wipe out all existing records and somehow prevent any sort of oral tradition being passed down by those who inherited those cities (supposedly).
I mean if they have the technology to do something as sophisticated as conducting a planetary-scale extinction centuries ago, why couldn't they possess the ability to just make those buildings?
Anyone who's interested in this should check out John Levi videos. Sorry it's YouTube but he clearly spells out the great resets that have occurred and how our so called history is a total lie.
Yes. Also worth a look at Martin Leidtke, Auto Didactic and Conspiracy-R-Us.
I see Neo-classical design that was made popular during enlightenment. Also eight columns, which has meaning for Chinese people, as it is seen as a lucky number.
Somewhere between. The brutalist was really ugly, all square, no ornaments. This one still has columns. It seems like something designed for efficiency, but columns were added so it would be somewhat ornamental. Maybe the architect was trying to make something that looked "western" but didn't have all the background to pull it off.
Duh. Because they are built to last, with lots of stone. Tell me - why are the pyramids still standing? Very suspicious, seeing as they are more than 6000 years old, if you ask me.
Masons were originally a guild of stonemasons that had very high standards with extremely long apprenticeships, so that they could build cathedrals and other important buildings. This developed into a ceremonial version - that we all love to hate - a secret society. In any case, important buildings such as central banks needed the perception of stability and trust, so Yeah, maybe consult that freemasonic architect who is conversant with stone. (Try and find such an architect today - you won't - they only build ridiculous concrete and steel structures, not stone ones, but that's another story)
Your theory may have something to it though, the fact that freemasons occupied powerful positions. And as we know, power corrupts absolutely.
The pyramids have been rebuilt/ repaired probably numerous times. I think the answer lies in the base and underground structures.
Also externally lined in limestone. Water flowing throughout the granite/concrete blockwork. Insulative materials, conductive materials...
The very top Capstone may have been gold, it has been removed. Lots of people assume the pyramids were a power-plant, i prefer the more realistic theory that they are giant water purifiers.
There are probably some actual stone masons out there that can do great work.
The great stonemasons of the world have lost the ability to recreate what we see in the grand cathedrals and capitol buildings found world wide. It's another red flag to add to OP's post.
I guess for theorizing, we could start with modern equipment, then work backwards in time from there. Should be "easy" enough to build a modest cathedral with cranes and everything else. It of course gets real interesting when you don't have those to build with.
Have a look at the "veiled sculptures" carved from single pieces of granite. These miraculous artworks are absolutely impossible to create today. By anyone...
I agree. It's been done many times. One example I'm well aware of is the attempted moving of the stones used to build Nan Madol, a place I've personally explored. Actually was lucky enough to have had a meeting with Micronesia's leading archeologist Mauricio Rufino while I was there. The "re-creators" failed dismally to move 5 ton stones on their boats (using modern equipment). But the official narrative states that stones up to 50 tons were moved and lifted into place via boat...
Man, we've been lied to about so much. But how do you fool so many for so long?
poppycock
If you knew about ley lines, would you not take advantage of them if you recognised the possibility of taking that advantage? Or are we now going to argue the science (or lack of it) of ley lines? There are arguments made, that the pyramids are on ley lines. Are they then therefore evil?
Or are you suggesting that freemasons were copying? But of course they were, that was the whole point of long apprenticeships etc. And yes, I am sure they studied ley lines. They were all for mimicking such ancient knowledge.
I am not sure what you are driving at. The problem is that on the one hand, there are the physical buildings, which were drawn up as architectural drawings etc. On the other, is the meaning that is inferred upon those buildings.
As I stated in a realist manner, the building is neo-classical - and yes, that is mimicking a far older style. Neo-classicism was about reviving what was perceived as the* golden ages* of ancient Romans and Greeks. Many people travelled to observe those ancient structures, because they were still there, and this was seen as the correct way to build. Hence the columns to hold up the parapets.
I think you are driving at the meanings of the neo-classical style - again, one has to remember that neo-classicism gave birth to the US constitution, and yes freemasons had a hand, but are you gonna tell me now that George Washington was an evil man? Get outtahere.
Nukes destroy at the impact zone, but leave some building standing, if they are strong enough. It just depends how close the bullding is to that impact zone, and how strong it is. An observatory was left standing at Hiroshima., is it therefore now a symbol of evil? This is absolutist thinking that does not help.
Yes, nukes are bad. Destruction like that is heart-breaking, but lets not equate surviving buildings with all the evil in the world.
Also, on the subject of generalization, I know many freemasons as well as rotary club and lions club members (offshoots) who put their free time into community projects. Are they evil? For example a man who took on a community project that was slated to cost 150000 dollars - they had already hired a contractor. He managed the project to completion with only 12000 dollars, while delivering the value that was required (installing a concrete barbecue). He uncovered the most disgusting public service corruption, and quietly saved our community from a hideous expense. Yes there is evil in the world, but please don't generalize.
Take a deep breath.
Interjecting into this thread with a daily reminder that 'nuclear bombs' aren't nuclear bombs.
https://decodingsymbols.wordpress.com/2021/09/08/nuclear-q/
Lol if you think your normal old county level freemason folk are in on it.
That's the entire point of the freemason hierarchy. Lower levels know almost nothing.
That's such a wild jump to make. "Some of these buildings share similar styles therefore the elites committed planetary-wide genocide a little over a century ago and were able to cover that up with nary a peep from the people who were moved into those abandoned places."
How in the hell would none of this have been passed on to those peoples' descendants? The 19th century wasn't that long ago, there's no way this would have been completely kept quiet.
Wait till you see the die off that's coming from the death shots. Then you'll start to understand how the "elites" achieved their previous "great resets".
We've had several resets whether it's mud flood or some sort of melting event. People in horse and buggy on dirt roads definitely didn't build these elaborate buildings in the 1800s. They were simply inheritors. Our entire history is a lie
How old are you? Late 1800s were not that long ago. Some of us have grandparents alive back then and would have said something.
Ancient megalithic structures, on the other hand, like Egyptian pyramids...That's where the lies are.
It is interesting to me that we're taught to believe that we've existed for thousands of years with relatively little progress, then all of a sudden, we figured out electricity, trains, cars, planes, telephones, radio, etc within the span of about 150-200 years....
These structures were inherited after a reset. People in horse and buggy on dirt roads didn't build these elaborate buildings as the narrative states
Look at the 1800 world fair videos. ELECTRIC, HUGE STRUCTURES. and then tore it all down a few months after "Building" clearly it was a cover up
There is a good book about that fair. The structures were largely plaster coated buildings made to last for the short duration of the fair. If left to age on their own, they would have failed within a couple years.
That’s the official narrative. Just like “vaccines are safe and effective” is also the official narrative.
The Palace of Fine Arts, San Fransisco World’s Fair still stands today for example.
Let’s say other World’s Fairs were built out of plaster and wood though: even then, the construction of such gargantuan structures exhibited at Chicago’s Columbian Exposition would have been impossible with horse and cart and the labour force available.
Let’s take it a step further: how perchance would the colossal canals lined with masonry have been dug for that fair alone? Horse and cart?
How about the gigantic statue standing in the middle of the canal?
Then there’s the waterworks and associated plumbing required for the massive elaborate fountains. Blokes with shovels, picks, chisels and horse and cart constructed all that for a 6 month fair only to destroy it?
The OFFICIAL NARRATIVE is being exposed here on this forum daily. This topic is but another one.
We have collectively been lied to about pretty much everything regarding history, science, medicine, politics...
Check out this book:
https://www.amazon.com/Devil-White-City-Madness-Changed/dp/0375725601
My wife is a civil engineer and has read this; it will explain it, while being a very entertaining "murder mystery" as the "hook" for the story.
Interesting how the crook and charlatan Thomas Edison gets a mention in the book synopsis but the actual mastermind of the Chicago "White City" Exposition's lighting and electricity, Nikola Tesla, does not...
I'm sorry fren, this book is an extension of the the official narrative, albeit in fictional form. Whilst I haven't read it I've known about it for a while. It's a common theme in the promotion of official narrative lies. Leo Tolstoy did this also in his lengthy tangent chapters in his epic War and Peace. A little bit of truth sprinkled in between more than generous heapings of propaganda "history".
The book isn't fiction. The author meticulously researches his material before writing them. He gets newspapers, diaries, letters, etc. from the people alive and involved with the subject he writes about. I read his book about Churchill during the year+ that London, and other cities, were bombed. Truly amazing to read! My wife, as a civil engineer, would have caught anything that didn't make engineering sense.
"Enlightenment" started in the late 17th century. But it drew heavily from Roman architecture and they ruled the world from England to Persia until the 400s AD. Having built so well that we still have roads and aqueducts from then, it would be natural to mimic them.
Built HOW? This is the point. Hammers, chisels, horse and cart, no cranes. Giant blocks. Huge statues atop massive structures. And then there's the GARGANTUAN domes. Haga Sophia in Turkey is a great example of the ludicrousness of the official narrative that anyone over long periods of time can simply build such things.
Look on YouTube. There are explanations which actually have an engineering basis and have been tried in real life. Why do you think no one thought of cranes, ramps, rollers, making use of water or sand to slide stones, making concrete by gluing rock dust and pebbles? If you were a slave and knew the rest of your life would be spent carving and moving a couple of stone blocks, would you sit down and call for supernatural help, or would you think "A lever would totally make this easier."? Splitting stone now is done as in ancient times but with better equipment: make a groove or hole and expand it or saw it.
You do not understand where I’m coming from mate. I’m reiterating the ludicrousness of the official narrative. There’s NO WAY slaves built the mega structures of the past. Time to expand your thinking, open your eyes, and open your mind.
This style of architecture dates back to Italian renaissance times.
Yeah I don't quite understand OP's point. There are many impressive buildings that were built before the 19th century going back to medieval times. What exactly is the theory here?
I think he is just mentioning we have clearly lived through another Great Reset and the history was hidden and re-written and were we clearly the inheritors of a great civilization's structural remains that spanned the entire world with the same stone building styles.
See, I've looked into the whole Tartaria thing some time ago and I felt like there was a whole lot of jumping to wild conclusions based on little evidence. Maybe the documentary wasn't well done or I'm just daft but I simply couldn't understand what exactly the theory was beyond "there was mudfloods at some point therefore all of history is a lie and they actually wore wigs in the 18th century as a defense against energy weapons." I'm not even kidding.
I can understand that they lie about history, of course they do. We see them twist facts all the time. But does that suggest that literally nothing happened like they say it does? Does that mean there was no civil war (like that documentary claimed)? I think some people start to discover they've been lying to us and then use that as an excuse to toss out everything.
I'd need to see a lot more compelling evidence before I gave the Tartaria stuff any more credence.
I’m not sure of the specific documentary you’re referring to as I haven’t seen one with the (wig theory) but I do think something still yet to be explained happen to a vast majority of the earth and causes rapidly changing climates.
I think fact of the Desert wasteland in Africa, the 200 foot cliffs of ice in Antarctica, the rapid growth of the Amazon in South America are all prove of the drastic changes in climate over a relatively short period.
I think that’s why the DS are so concerned with climate change as they might be trying to replicate a past event.
My theory is during that last change Oceans shifted and/or Lands liquefied (mud floods) which caused buildings to be sunken or destroyed and during this time the Tartarian Empire was decimated and history was rewritten. Technologies were hidden By the NEW Ruling Elites, maps were destroyed or hidden (The Vatican) and certain building were to advanced to destroy or “current” technology to explain, therefore they were covered with simple architecture or written off as these ‘spectacular structures’.
I think nukes are not what we were told and that could be what causes the Liquefication of the soil, shifts in the Oceans, melting of rock (granite). Japan was a test of what the elites were able to recreate.
I don’t know, There could be truths in the above or it could all be the rambling theories of a crazed person. Lol.
Future proves Past
The Deep State is using the same play book
The White Hats know their moves and have prepared counter moves
This is JUST a movie 🎥 🍿
There are plenty of families who have written diary-type records going back to the 1700's, and perhaps some in Europe even longer. Have any of them reported such a significant thing happening, other than the Revolutionary War, War of 1812, Civil War, WWI and WWII?
I have difficulty with this notion as well. Written & verbal accounts should mention these. But I have seen some amazing architecture from centuries ago that I'm amazed we could do without powered tools & machinery. Then you have sites like Giza, Puma Punku, Machu Pichu where they were definitely built by a lost civiization and lost tetechnology. But, think how easy they shift the narrative at a time where information sharing and spreading is much easier with cellphones, & internet. The history books will write Biden won the election, Trump was a racist, Covid killed millions. That's with hundreds of millions of people knowing that is a lie, but it will still be the narrative for the future. Now think how easy it was to control that information a hundred yrs ago and then 500 yrs ago.
THAT WILL BE THE NARRATIVE UNLESS Q AND THE ANONS WAKE ENOUGH PEOPLE UP
which looks like it is HABBENEING
Who's to say they didn't have tech that was potentially more advanced than we have today? How would we know? Who's to say that scrying mirrors weren't the iphones of the day? History is written by the victors, the controllers...
Edit to add: This time it's different I feel. This time we've been given a shot at defeating the controllers, the DS, the cabal, the demons. AND We The People ARE clearly winning! Thanks to Q!
From what I understand the Tartaria theorists just claim those are fabricated which is why I have difficulty taking them seriously. Apparently all of these bits of evidence were made up by the elites or something. It's just too far-fetched for me.
Sudden climate change? Maybe it had something to do with a little event called Noah's flood?
Not disagreeing but I don't think flood in the same manner as you are. It was a flood that involved the shifting of large bodies of water as the African Dessert is proof of but it also caused the soil to liquefy and ancient buildings to sink below grade (Mudflood Theory)
Right, it wasn't just a lot of rain, the atmosphere and geography of the whole world changed. Water burst out of the core of the earth. It never even rained before the flood.
There's a dude named Trey Smith on YT who does really good biblical documentaries. One of them is about the flood and how the antediluvian world would have looked before it happened. I do think it's worth a watch and probably explains a lot of that stuff without needing the mudflood theory to be true.
https://rumble.com/v1b7btl-the-great-reset-the-entire-great-reset-explained-in-17-minutes.html
Klaus Schwab is a leader for climate change and one of the Elites in my opinion.
Save Israel for last
Alot of it has to do with the idea that we are living in a post invasion world. Essentially, when Christ returned from Heaven ~60-80 AD the thousand year reign occurred on Earth. Then around the late 1800s, Satan was unbound and allowed on Earth. It is an alternative explanation as to the dystopic nature of the world we live in. Tie in the Cabal and their need to traffic and sacrifice humans to different demonic effigies....resets make sense and Satan would love to be deceitful and hide evidence of Christ's accomplishments for Earth.
Because it's revitalizing previous designs.
The Greeks invented Dorian, Corinthian, and Ionic columns along with a host of other architectural breakthroughs.
The Romans copied and expanded upon the Greeks discoveries. The Europeans copied and expanded upon the Romans. And so on the pattern continues.
So of course you will see revisioned column work althroughout history. Another anon mentioned the neoclassical period brought about during the Renaissance, and that is exactly what you are seeing.
And it's no secret that the founding fathers viewed America as a sort of new Rome and thus borrowed their architecture as an inspiration for our own. I think some people start going down the rabbit hole, learn that we've been lied to all of our lives and then start concluding everything is therefore a conspiracy where a more simple explanation suffices.
Agreed. Another problem many in our ranks have is blindly trusting rando streamers who claim all of this outlandish shit with little to no empirical evidence.
I can remember many slow (or none at all) Q drop days where the PSB24/7 stream would discuss crap like the mud flood. At it's height, that was a channel that had 100,000+ Q followers and researchers subscribed (assuming YT didn't suppress their sub/view counts).
So that's 100K of us that on dead drop days might've listened to Radix, Thumper, and Deadcat ramble on adnausem, hypothesizing about these type of rabbit holes.
In all honesty, it feels a bit like the flat Earth psyop. Purely distraction, used as a discrediting example against the community for the normies to label us as they are instructed to do so (programming). Im not doubting much of history has been covered up, rewritten, or even lost. But this whole impossible architecture narrative is incredibly weak to my perception. Glad others here can logically see the numerous holes in these convoluted theories.
See, I feel like there's actually much more compelling evidence for flat Earth than there is for the Tartaria theories. Whether that itself is ultimately nonsense or not is besides the point. I'm someone who is genuinely open-minded and willing to entertain the possibility that everything I've been taught is free-game. I don't think anything should be off limits as far as asking questions goes. If nothing else I find these ideas to be fun thought experiments!
That being said, I'm not just dismissing mudfloods/Tartaria out of hand because it goes against what I've been taught. I've actually looked into it myself and I just really didn't find the theory that convincing. I do think mudfloods have happened but that doesn't mean they were deliberately engineered as a planetary scale genocide or whatever. And the observation that buildings in different countries share similar styles of architecture isn't even that difficult to explain. Conventional history about Europeans borrowing their Renaissance styles from antiquity is not exactly that mind-bending.
To me this just seems like a simple occam's razor affair.
I concur. The simplest answer is usually correct!
Also, kudos on your name if referencing the MTG card! 😉
I do (or did) play MTG, but interestingly enough that's not where I got the name from! That one's actually just a coincidence lol
Uh, earth is flat. Look into it.
Why don't people make stuff like that anymore?
Simple. Evolution of architecture into modern design. Out with the old, in with the new methodology.
As for California and Chicago, I cannot say as Im not versed in the events surrounding those cities. But, given that both were disasters with high casualties and infrastructure destruction, one might consider they bricked over entire areas where there was massive loss of life and there was nothing to salvage as far as sublevel infrastructure.
So basically like dozers used in the world wars to build mass graves, the respective cities you mentioned perhaps literally buried the dead. Bricking them in, a form of mausoleum. Most wouldve been charred remains anyhow.
At work, will definitely look later though, thank you!
I would be remiss if not to remind you though, CA was developed many years before the gold rush. The Spanish had been there for quite some time establishing many elaborate buildings and settlements. One of those being the SF area. Very comparable to other Spanish colonies throughout the Americas and Caribbean.
Reading through that, one person claims that it's impossible to construct those types of buildings even now. Really? Is it that it's impossible or rather that the elites choose not to, instead opting to lean into brutalist architecture to create a sense of oppression? How many of these people making these claims are architects and not just speaking out of their ass?
You are overlooking the fact that by the time the gold rush in California happened, the Spanish had been colonizing California since the 16th century and had built a highway system, El Camino Real, which is now a modern road but still there. There was shipping activity at the natural ports of San Diego, Monterey, and San Francisco. It wasn't the frontier. The Oregon Trail brought plenty of people from the east. There were railroads all over the place. And as to craftsmanship, there are and have always been very few artists of Michaelangelo calibre, but they were there. No need to postulate aliens or whatever. It's just hard to get really good when the average lifespan is only about 45, most people die first.
Because it is fantastically expensive now to quarry and work stone. Ask Trump. He is famous for a few marble floors and buildings. Also, marble stains and pits and takes upkeep. Modern resin composites are easier. (why didn't these ancient civilizations do that, if they were so sophisticated?). Granite lasts much better than marble, but is even harder to work and match and not as common. That makes a granite building much more of a prestige project. All stone is heavy compared to steel and concrete and you can't build very high, modern cities require a different construction. Most buildings used to have basements for cool storage, and coal storage, and when new buildings were built they often went over older ones--look at Seattle for a better example. Or Troy. Great fires do not burn stone. That's why the old stone things lasted a long time. Red brick is a cheap alternative and easy to do on site, whereas stone work requires a quarry somewhere and someone to haul the stones.
It seems as if most of the people positing these theories don't have any architectural background and are just fabricating claims.
They want to believe that humans are weak, lazy, unimaginative, helpless, and that their lives are controlled by evil sinister forces, I think. So they have turned to fables.
I have architectural background and still work in construction, Have for decades. I 100% support OP's opinions because I've not only had much first hand experience but have also devoted many years and 1000s of hours of research into this topic.
So you agree that these structures couldn't be built today? As in we literally are incapable of making these buildings rather than choose not to?
If it's "fantastically expensive now to quarry and work stone" with the heavy machinery and high tech precision equipment available, how on Earth are we to believe the relatively "primitive" peoples of the past were able to achieve their architectural endeavours?
That is why we don't build such stone things, except for very rich people, and back then it was the same. Very rich people were calling the shots. Like kings. And if you want to see how-to. You Tube is full of many, many theories. Everything from showing how ordinary people used their muscles and brains and time to find away, to all the nihilistic "people can't do anything so it must have been aliens." Geez. How you are insulting thousands of people over thousands of years, saying that.
Calm down mate. The way the mega constructions were achieved in the past is a mystery. You stating how it was done via the rich people/ kings shows ignorance, not knowledge. All theories. We DON’T know. Who said aliens? Not me! Me stating “Relatively primitive” refers to the official narrative sheesh lol.
Show us
City Beautiful Movement
Probably designed by a committee.
The stupider we get, the more simple technology begins to resemble magic.
Lol, that's like the inverse of Clarke's dictum that "any science sufficiently advanced is indistinguishable from magic." And therefore, if the science is not advanced enough, magic can not be distinguished from reality.
Don't get me going on the Tartars.
Muh mud flood. Baloney!
So ridiculous some of these theories. Perfect example is the claim that throughout Europe there must've been a flood because of the raised main structures of so many Euro towns....
Hello people! Wake up! If your city was destroyed by mechanized warfare, the common practice was to raise the streets above existing foundations that could be salvaged. This was done to fix sewer/water infrastructure and utilities first, then you can begin on rebuilding the actual destroyed buildings.
This is what the Soviets did althroughout the USSR and it's very noticable to anyone who has frequented any of the large city centres that were war torn. The Russians had their style and methods for rebuilding. As did the French, Italians, Dutch, etc.
That's the first I've heard of the raising streets aspect, got a link? I hate mud flood
Here's a couple of quickies links as Im just about to leave for work. I should have some better stuff bookmarked on my PC, but it may not be in English language. I will make a note to check after my shift today!
Link 1 PDF alert. Abridged explanation and further documentation about rebuilding infrastructure post WWII throughout Europe
Link 2 Baltic rebuilding of infrastructure post WW2
From my understanding, the raising of the street level methodology was also mostly done in lower elevation and coastal areas. I am most familiar with Riga LV, and this makes perfect sense as the city is built in a bay which is the mouth to the countries river systems. But the Russians were notorious for using copy/pasta building methods. Some were good, say the trains and electrical grids. Some were awful, bloc housing and bridge design for example.
So that being said, a local example for me would be Riga compared to Vilinus. Vilinus is not coastal nor a lower elevation than Riga. Yet the USSR approached rebuilding (and yes elevating certain areas) the exact same way.
Dig adequate trenches where the streets were. Lay sub structure and utilities. Cover it up, then start working on the bombed out buildings themselves. Many got the cookie cutter soviet rebuild design, but obviously salvageable buildings were rebuilt in the same design pre war. This was done for a few reasons, the main one being time one can assume.
Tartards have tied their brains in pretzel knots trying to explain some pretty basic stuff as a worldwide genocide that somehow hasn't been passed down orally by our great-great-great grandparents. I mean if a genocide of that scale had really taken place in the 19th century surely some of that would have been passed on here and there. Remember the 1800s weren't really that long ago in the grand scale of things though it may seem like the distant past to us.
Why have I never heard of this before like 2 years ago?
i Love this post! Tartars don't get the recognition they deserve. It is living proof the victories write the history. Sad US Schools don't teach The TRUE World History!
Same!
Phantom time theory fits in here as well
the calendar change yes, the invention of Charlemagne, basically the dark ages are made up which is equivalent to a missing and/or fabricated 297 years . I am not completely convinced one way or the other, but it does come across quite interesting as a proposal, and given how many lies and fake history that is out there, it might be something else to consider.
Thanks for posting this. My favourite topic. Don’t have time to go through all comments, gotta go to work. Look forward to contributing more later. These buildings truly are the elephant in the architecture room. The official narrative is a joke.
Ahh, ley lines. Like the ley line connecting pizza restaurants in London...
Isn't it interesting how all these amazing structures, all with similar designs, all over the planet, were supposedly erected in the mid-late 1800s by people who barely had the tools and the skills to make simple dwellings?
It's the most obvious in Australia. At that time there were very few convicts there who had any sort of skills, and yet these world-class cathedrals and government buildings were all built there within a span of 50 years.
If this sort of thing interests you, check out the Tartarian Truthers channel on Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/c/TartarianTruthers
Edit: Having read through the rest of your comments here, I see that you are already well versed in this topic, lol!
Yes! And then try to fathom their explanations for tearing most of them down not long after.
On an excursion in 2006, I found a solid porcelain glazed hand of a statue buried in the side of a creek bed in Forest Park, St. Louis, the site of the WF 1904. There is nothing temporary about it. Most of the buildings that were "built for the purpose of the fair" only to be destroyed, were buried within the boundaries of the massive park. The Ferris Wheel axle has yet to be found. I believe these buildings existed way before 1904 and the Expos were a way to fool the gen pop. Jon Levi is excellent at explaining it all. The StL Art Museum still exists and it is a stunning fixture on a huge hill. There is no way people with horse and cart transported massive slabs of granite through muddy roads. Trains, perhaps? But not wagons as we are led to believe.
I still can’t wrap my mind around it, and I’ve come to accept a lot of things as truths. Who built them? Where did they go? Where they simply abandoned? Where are the historical records? The documentation of their discovery out in the middle of nowhere? Mud floods, how? How many of these are there/were?
The who, what, where, why, and how doesn’t add up!
What a find! Awesome! The World's Fair's ferris wheels were HUGE! The carriages the size of buses.
Yes it's very interesting and intriguing. The main falicy I've witnessed is many conversations getting sidelined by either mentioning tartaria or mud floods. Stay away from both, and just concentrate on the architecture, population density at the claimed time of building and the tools available or not available at the time. Something definitely doesn't add up, but I can't tell you exactly what that is yet. It's interesting how the same style buildings are found literally in every country and in countries that clearly have their own building style that doesn't resemble the Greco-Roman style found everywhere. The Chicago world fair of 1893 had electric... and several major engineering feats that cannot be explained if commissioned to be built in only 2 years... particularly the water features, and absolutely massive buildings. Same with world fair in Philly. All done with horse and buggy? There's just no way, and no way it was done in the timeframe mentioned. In addition to this, just coming off a civil war, where did all the money come from, AND, who in their right mind would have thought it was a good idea to hemorage money for buildings that are only temporary? Again, something doesn't quite add up... and there's plenty more mysteries, like orphan trains and incubator babies... where did THEY come from? Lots of questions... not many answers.
You can't tell me people in horse and buggy on dirt roads built these elaborate buildings. They were simply inheritors after a great reset. History as we've been told is a lie. Not too surprising considering the movie we're living through now. Jon Levi on YouTube does some really good research on our false history looking at old buildings and unexplainable " natural " structures.
Fomenko has it all completely figured out and doesn't need to advocate a strange mud flood to justify it
Link me brotha? Would love to hear a different theory than “mud flood”. Lol
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_chronology_(Fomenko)
I assume this is who he was referencing?
Mud flood makes no sense. These no way there wouldn’t be any kind of surviving account or crummy old photographs of such a catastrophe as recent as the 1800’s, even if they tried to wipe the record books clean.
Older civilizations were definitely buried by something. It's evident by some of our buildings today and plenty of underground cities have been discovered including my in my home town. Wasn't aware of Formenko. Who are they?
Taiwan was a fishing community until the Kuo Min Tang moved there to escape Mao's communism. The KMT were supported by the USA, because their views were seen as moderate, until the USA decided to change their minds and support Mao instead, because he was winning. That's when they had to run.
My point is that this happened in the early part of the 20th century. However, the building is hearkening to neo-classicism, which was still popular in that era.
Why do you say that? This is an old style of architecture, based on Greek and Classic models. It certainly could have been built in the 19th Century.
...Yes? Why can't they be? It's an ancient style of architecture known throughout all of the world. Expert masons built them and are worldwide, why is that so unfathomable?
If it's a symbol of their power & control over the whole world, why not? I can perfectly see a controlling elite seeking to plant status symbols of their domination in every country in the world while the rest of us live in squalor, yes. I wouldn't put it past them.
But sure, you can believe whatever you want to believe regardless of how logical or not.
Freemasonry. Free masonry? -> Stolen masonry.
That's fine, I respect your right to have that opinion. I'm not saying I definitively know the answer to that but I simply find it more likely that the elites have used the masons to construct symbols of their authority rather than they stole it from some super-advanced civilization that they managed to wipe out all existing records and somehow prevent any sort of oral tradition being passed down by those who inherited those cities (supposedly).
I mean if they have the technology to do something as sophisticated as conducting a planetary-scale extinction centuries ago, why couldn't they possess the ability to just make those buildings?