General Flynn - Dark 2 Light - ⭐️⭐️⭐️
(media.greatawakening.win)
Comments (17)
sorted by:
The players under q and q+ keep shifting around and throwing confusing signals because that's 5th gen warfare, the game is as complicated as they can make it and so are the people. We have to embrace this and follow the results instead of the moves themselves.
Absolutely, everyone needs to except this concept so they don't keep being disappointed and getting discouraged .
WHAT A
BEAUTIFUL
BLACK
SKY
NOT LONG NOW…
The gray zone describes a set of activities that occur between peace (or cooperation) and war (or armed conflict). A multitude of activities fall into this murky in-between—from nefarious economic activities, influence operations, and cyberattacks to mercenary operations, assassinations, and disinformation campaigns. Generally, gray-zone activities are considered gradualist campaigns by state and non-state actors that combine non-military and quasi-military tools and fall below the threshold of armed conflict. They aim to thwart, destabilize, weaken, or attack an adversary, and they are often tailored toward the vulnerabilities of the target state. While gray-zone activities are nothing new, the onset of new technologies has provided states with more tools to operate and avoid clear categorization, attribution, and detection—all of which complicates the United States’ and its allies’ ability to respond.
https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/new-atlanticist/todays-wars-are-fought-in-the-gray-zone-heres-everything-you-need-to-know-about-it/
The definition of “gray zone” is imperfect and not fully agreed upon. But it’s more important to work on the problem than to quibble over precise definitions—especially for something that poses real and immediate challenges for the United States, its allies, and the international rules-based order. While the Soviet Union, its Warsaw Pact allies, and even the United States and its partners operated in what we now call the “gray zone” during the Cold War, the available mediums and vulnerabilities have only increased with the globalization of trade and capital markets, as well as the proliferation of the internet and social media. Ironically, the strength of open and transparent societies also tend to provide multiple avenues and opportunities for competitors to operate in the gray zone.
—Arun Iyer is a nonresident senior fellow in Forward Defense and served in a variety of operational and operational leadership assignments covering Europe, the Middle East, and the Indo-Pacific in the US Department of Defense.
One can argue that activities in the gray zone have always been a feature of great-power competition. Proxy wars, destabilizing insurgencies, legal warfare (lawfare), and information warfare—by adversaries and allies alike—have been a feature of conflict for millennia. But the cost of conventional conflict in the nuclear era has grown too steep, and the risk of escalation too profound. As a result, nations seek to promote their national objectives through aggression conducted covertly, or with obfuscated attribution or justification, in order to achieve their goals.
WAR GRAY ZONES
https://warontherocks.com/2015/05/fighting-and-winning-in-the-gray-zone/
Soon.
Who is his message directed at? This is something Anons have known for a long time now. I landed here almost two years ago and what he is calling 5th generation warfare has been a constant topic here.
It makes me sad to say it, General Flynn comes across as someone struggling to stay relevant. But that can be said for most of the cast of characters that emerged right after the election. They played their role, maybe not even totally aware what it was. Now they’re fading into the background and trying to stay relevant.
This is what worries me. If we can’t trust Flynn, and we can’t trust Pence, and we can’t trust Pompeo, and we can’t trust Barr, who can we trust? Just POTUS and Scavino? We tracked every book deal, black eye and walking boot, and we still have no idea what the fuck is going on. Just sit back and trust the plan is getting more difficult by the day.
Maybe focus your ire on politicians/governor's who are in clear violation of their oath... Targeting the one governor who is at least doing something good {no, not everything, but most} is expending ammo needlessly.
That's fine, I'm just saying they're are bigger fish to fry as you well know .
I'm kind of the "let him continue to do good things until he sells out" type
If he runs against Trump, then we'll know for sure.
Also want to add that my biggest fear is that he does run. Because he'll get the woman vote. My wife, for instance.
In that light, it's a positively devious plan and a long con that would actually work