Its a fascinating read. I am just at the part of the standing, and the Judge decimates the DSCC's arguments categorically, including their claim that even if the ballot boxes violated the law, the result would dilute votes equally on both sides.
DSCC's claim about "equal" likelihood is pure speculation. In
contrast, the failure to follow election laws is a fact which
forces everyone——even DSCC——to question the legitimacy of
election results.
This is going to set the precedent that voters dont have to show that each violation caused votes to go to Biden more than Trump. This would be a huge deal in other begger cases.
Its a fascinating read. I am just at the part of the standing, and the Judge decimates the DSCC's arguments categorically, including their claim that even if the ballot boxes violated the law, the result would dilute votes equally on both sides.
This is going to set the precedent that voters dont have to show that each violation caused votes to go to Biden more than Trump. This would be a huge deal in other begger cases.