What if what we call the Mandela effect is simply extremely skilled gaslighting by Big Tech or some Government agency, with the goal to make us question what we remember and what is true and our own sanity to destabilize the population and distract us?
It would be incredibly easy in this largely tech based world to accomplish this.
And the goal of narcissist gaslighting is essentially the same thing, to make people believe that they are going nuts.
Idk, i can totally see it. BTW i sent the Brittney dress post to my ex wife, who was a huge Brittney fan, and she said it was 100% plaid in her recollection.
maybe that wasnt the correct insult for someone so arrogant as to tell me i am wrong, just bc you remember it differently. I probably should have said arrogant prick. Would have been more precise.
You are wrong. It was always spelled Chick-fil-A. You're just misremembering because the logo is so stylized that nobody actually reads it. But people do read the abundance of advertisements where they actually spelled it "chiken," so that's what people, including you, remember.
It's not just my memory versus yours. It's your memory (with an easy explanation for why you are misremember, or, rather, why you never actually knew in the first place), versus literally all of the evidence. It's a hard sell for you to say that they covertly replaced all the signs and material with signs with a different spelling. I also have an old picture that I literally took myself from years ago where the Chick-fil-A logo happens to be in the background.
What you're not realizing is that the premise of the OP can be true, and you still be wrong. If the goal was to get people to question their own memories, it would be far more effective to start putting out seedlings (such as an ad that says "eat more chiken" that is more prominent than the logo itself) to get you to actually misremember, than it would be to somehow go back and change all instances of the sign in history.