I was talking about the risk of dying from Covid. That is separate from the risk of dying from vaxx complications (which are obviously elevated).
If the vaxx consequences are fatal 'by year 5', it won't be fatal from Covid - it would be something else.
Look at the article/graphs to see what I mean. They break the risk into two categories.
Either way, my original comment was made the observation that the risk of dying from Covid was vanishingly small (irregardless of whether a kid took the vaxx) and therefore, no kid should take the vaxx.
I agree (if I was talking about 'actual risk' 'from the vaxx').
But when I used the term 'actual risk', I was referring to the actual risk of 'dying from Covid (in that age group)'.
I updated the post with that clarification.
.... over what period of time?
Pretend it's 100% fatal at 7 years.
A 3 year study might not show you this.
I was talking about the risk of dying from Covid. That is separate from the risk of dying from vaxx complications (which are obviously elevated).
If the vaxx consequences are fatal 'by year 5', it won't be fatal from Covid - it would be something else.
Look at the article/graphs to see what I mean. They break the risk into two categories.
Either way, my original comment was made the observation that the risk of dying from Covid was vanishingly small (irregardless of whether a kid took the vaxx) and therefore, no kid should take the vaxx.
OK