Nuclear fission is real. Nuclear power plants create electricity by carefully modulating fission to create enough heat to turn water into steam which then spins turbines.
Nuclear bombs use the same fission process at an unrestrained, "all at once" level. The difference is exactly like the difference between starting a fire (slow release of heat) or setting off some dynamite (boom).
Next time some one posits that idea; ask them three things:
Exactly how much electricity is too much?
How exactly would too much electricity collapse civilization? What is the mechanism at play?
How is the assertion that too much power usage is bad any different than the globalists saying that there are too many humans on the planet and that we’re harming the planet?
If this person can’t answer these questions, then they’re bullshitting you.
It was gurdjieff hat said this over hundred years ago. He said many things that we now know are true..so inclined to believe him. With all this talk of mud floods ...I wondered if too much use could change frequency of the Schumann resonance or something similar. He said more than one....perhaps it was electricity from another source?
Never heard of Gurdjieff before, but after reading through excerpts from his work he strikes me as one of the esoteric types. Mildly interesting, but not my cup of tea.
One thing that stood out to me about his teachings is that he constantly speaks of “energy” but fails to define what kind of energy he’s talking about. This is a hallmark of esoteric types who don’t understand physics. There is no such thing as “energy” or “pure energy”. There are different types of energy: thermal, nuclear, kinetic, gravitational potential, electromagnetic, etc.
People who speak of “energy” without clarification simply don’t know what they’re talking about.
A discussion of gurdjieff’s writings on Reddit implies that he believed a number of bizarre ideas. Firstly, that there have been two prior civs that have been brought down by using too much electricity; however, these two civs are never identified, which is a major red flag. Secondly, he seems to believe that because our brains operate on electricity, then everything else using electricity affects our brains, chiefly by decreasing our willpower. Once again, no clarification or explanation is provided. If external EM fields significantly affected human brains, then said brains would go haywire every time someone was subjected to an MRI. Lastly, an apparent quote from him seems to be along the lines of “when we think, we are positively charged, when we do, we are negatively charged”. Whoever teaches this understands nothing of human biology or electric charge. The human body contains both positive and negative charges, uses both of them equally, and overall has a neutral charge.
Be very careful with people who are tauted as gurus or experts on the esoteric arts. They speak very artfully and convincingly of higher human consciousness, ancient civilizations, and “energy”, but a closer inspection of their writings reveals that they are mostly fluff and no substance, not to mention no scientific literacy.
You must remember he spoke in the language of the day. He said our sun neither heats or freezes..nothing that was known..but true. He was privy to teachings thatwe still don't understand and he certainly understood about aliens although to my knowledge he never spoke of them. All his students were told to study maharbarrata books. Carlos casteneda .the illiad..his father was a bard and could recite the epic of Gilgamesh and it was absolutely true to what was found .
He had amazing knowledge.....he said this world is a reciprocal world.we all eat the ones below us and yes our energy whether positive or negative is eaten by those above us. Here knew our purpose in being here but wrapped everything up so he was hard to decipher...he didn't give knowledge away you had to work mentally for it. Everyone was in awe of what he as a man could do..not speak..do.
He students wrote books..if you read what Gurdjieff wrote you wouldn't understand it unless you were at a certain level of being. I am only understanding bits now .
So you might understand something on an intellectual level but your being can be still that of a small child...the Mad professor? Tesla spoke of these sort of people...knowledge and being must grow at the same pace
Less than a month we had everyone freaking out because CERN was firing up their particle accelerators. Assertions that CERN was trying to esoterically effect people’s souls or crack open a portal to Hell abounded, though no one promoting these wild theories could provide a shred of evidence when prompted, much less explain the physics of how that would even work. All I got was complaining about CERN being controlled by the Deep State and having a dumb statue of a Hindu god on their front entrance.
Don’t even get me started on NESARA, flat earth, QFS, (insert politician here) is a clone/ already executed, Tesla actually invented free energy, and a whole plethora of other crackpot ideas that have been tossed around in the name of Q. No evidence, no cohesive argument, just “the mainstream media doesn’t agree with what I’m saying, therefore I’m right!”
Such lack of discernment, logic, and evidence reflects poorly on our movement. There’s a reason half of patriots.win refers to us as Qtards.
There’s plenty of footage on YouTube, plus eyewitness reports of people who saw the tests, not to mention the people who survived Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Claiming that nukes don’t exist while completely omitting all the evidence that they do is moronic.
We have seen what the "thousand bomber raids" did to Germany and not one of them wrought as much damage as either the Hiroshima or Nagasaki bombs. How did the Allies manage to get so many bombers over the target, I wonder?
It's a good thought experiment.
A case could be made that all the evidence for nuclear bombs, including what is listed here could be wrong, fake or misinterpreted.
You're getting a lot of hate for this. Guess we're not ready yet.
Why was MacArthur unable to use nukes to stop the Korean war? Why does the nuclear symbol look like a film reel? Why was Fukushima safe for the Olympic torch relay? How many people died at 3 mile island?
There would have been immediate condemnation and retaliation from the USSR and China, the former of which had nukes of their own at the time.
Nukes were used against Japan because the US concluded that they would lose millions of troops in a conventional invasion because the Japanese would rather fight to the last man than surrender. The Korean War was also on a much smaller scale than WWII, and Congress had not declared war on Korea.
The radiation hazard symbol was created by members of a nuclear research group at Berkley in 1946. The symbol was adopted because it was simply, easy to discern at a distance, and symbolized radiation coming from an atomic nucleus. Kind of does look a film reel too though, never saw that before.
Fukushima is habitable a decade after the accident because
Much of the radioactive material spilled into the ocean and was carried away.
The contaminated topsoil was removed and replaced.
The Japanese learned from Chernobyl how not to cleanup after a meltdown and implemented better practices.
Total death toll from Three Mile Island: 0, though a slight uptick in cancer cases was detected in the surrounding area.
These answers are also logical, if nuclear weapons were a very effective propaganda tool. Of course that could be wrong, but there are enough inconsistencies for me to be increasingly skeptical of the conventional story regarding all things nuclear.
Go look at the sheet of green glass,at the test site in New mexico,and all the sinkholes in Nevada..... you can visit once a year I belive.
They were tested plenty.
There's footage all over the place, you idiot.
Nuclear fission is real. Nuclear power plants create electricity by carefully modulating fission to create enough heat to turn water into steam which then spins turbines.
Nuclear bombs use the same fission process at an unrestrained, "all at once" level. The difference is exactly like the difference between starting a fire (slow release of heat) or setting off some dynamite (boom).
Is there any truth that the world using too much electricity would bring down civilization?
Maybe, but where "too much" begins is presently unknown, as far as I know.
Next time some one posits that idea; ask them three things:
If this person can’t answer these questions, then they’re bullshitting you.
It was gurdjieff hat said this over hundred years ago. He said many things that we now know are true..so inclined to believe him. With all this talk of mud floods ...I wondered if too much use could change frequency of the Schumann resonance or something similar. He said more than one....perhaps it was electricity from another source?
Never heard of Gurdjieff before, but after reading through excerpts from his work he strikes me as one of the esoteric types. Mildly interesting, but not my cup of tea.
One thing that stood out to me about his teachings is that he constantly speaks of “energy” but fails to define what kind of energy he’s talking about. This is a hallmark of esoteric types who don’t understand physics. There is no such thing as “energy” or “pure energy”. There are different types of energy: thermal, nuclear, kinetic, gravitational potential, electromagnetic, etc. People who speak of “energy” without clarification simply don’t know what they’re talking about.
A discussion of gurdjieff’s writings on Reddit implies that he believed a number of bizarre ideas. Firstly, that there have been two prior civs that have been brought down by using too much electricity; however, these two civs are never identified, which is a major red flag. Secondly, he seems to believe that because our brains operate on electricity, then everything else using electricity affects our brains, chiefly by decreasing our willpower. Once again, no clarification or explanation is provided. If external EM fields significantly affected human brains, then said brains would go haywire every time someone was subjected to an MRI. Lastly, an apparent quote from him seems to be along the lines of “when we think, we are positively charged, when we do, we are negatively charged”. Whoever teaches this understands nothing of human biology or electric charge. The human body contains both positive and negative charges, uses both of them equally, and overall has a neutral charge.
Be very careful with people who are tauted as gurus or experts on the esoteric arts. They speak very artfully and convincingly of higher human consciousness, ancient civilizations, and “energy”, but a closer inspection of their writings reveals that they are mostly fluff and no substance, not to mention no scientific literacy.
You must remember he spoke in the language of the day. He said our sun neither heats or freezes..nothing that was known..but true. He was privy to teachings thatwe still don't understand and he certainly understood about aliens although to my knowledge he never spoke of them. All his students were told to study maharbarrata books. Carlos casteneda .the illiad..his father was a bard and could recite the epic of Gilgamesh and it was absolutely true to what was found .
He had amazing knowledge.....he said this world is a reciprocal world.we all eat the ones below us and yes our energy whether positive or negative is eaten by those above us. Here knew our purpose in being here but wrapped everything up so he was hard to decipher...he didn't give knowledge away you had to work mentally for it. Everyone was in awe of what he as a man could do..not speak..do.
He students wrote books..if you read what Gurdjieff wrote you wouldn't understand it unless you were at a certain level of being. I am only understanding bits now . So you might understand something on an intellectual level but your being can be still that of a small child...the Mad professor? Tesla spoke of these sort of people...knowledge and being must grow at the same pace
Listen up, noob.
You are posting in the wrong place.
You have false information with no supporting sauce.
There is more than enough proof debunking your argument.
That is all.
Definitely gonna trust the guy that sounds like he's halfway through puberty
Halfway? I don't think he's hit it yet!!!
An old friend of mine was in the occupation Army in Japan after WWII..
Nuclear weapons exist.
when did the great awakening become conspiracy.win?
My sentiments exactly.
Less than a month we had everyone freaking out because CERN was firing up their particle accelerators. Assertions that CERN was trying to esoterically effect people’s souls or crack open a portal to Hell abounded, though no one promoting these wild theories could provide a shred of evidence when prompted, much less explain the physics of how that would even work. All I got was complaining about CERN being controlled by the Deep State and having a dumb statue of a Hindu god on their front entrance.
Don’t even get me started on NESARA, flat earth, QFS, (insert politician here) is a clone/ already executed, Tesla actually invented free energy, and a whole plethora of other crackpot ideas that have been tossed around in the name of Q. No evidence, no cohesive argument, just “the mainstream media doesn’t agree with what I’m saying, therefore I’m right!”
Such lack of discernment, logic, and evidence reflects poorly on our movement. There’s a reason half of patriots.win refers to us as Qtards.
"Where's footage?"
Search for "Bikini Atoll"...
I just get pictures of softporn, ... sigh... the once serious internet
https://search.brave.com/search?q=bikini+atoll&source=web
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bikini_Atoll
https://www.bikiniatoll.info/history-of-bikini-atoll/
etc.
And if the nuclear bomb were a code for blackmail, this Wikipedia article also makes a lot of sense.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bikini#:~:text=French%20automotive%20engineer%20Louis%20R%C3%A9ard,name%20for%20the%20island%2C%20Pikinni.
There’s plenty of footage on YouTube, plus eyewitness reports of people who saw the tests, not to mention the people who survived Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Claiming that nukes don’t exist while completely omitting all the evidence that they do is moronic.
I wonder what my USAF friends were maintaining and flying around on missions?
This is a good video about Operation Dominic/Fishbowl nuclear tests.
https://archive.org/details/OperationDOMINICNuclearTests1962
They tested them in the desert.
We have seen what the "thousand bomber raids" did to Germany and not one of them wrought as much damage as either the Hiroshima or Nagasaki bombs. How did the Allies manage to get so many bombers over the target, I wonder?
Video? Here is some good video of Russian nuclear testing: https://www.dailymotion.com/video/xui9vb
It's a good thought experiment. A case could be made that all the evidence for nuclear bombs, including what is listed here could be wrong, fake or misinterpreted.
The use of nuclear weapons is documented in the sumerian cuneiform tablets.
You're getting a lot of hate for this. Guess we're not ready yet.
Why was MacArthur unable to use nukes to stop the Korean war? Why does the nuclear symbol look like a film reel? Why was Fukushima safe for the Olympic torch relay? How many people died at 3 mile island?
MacArthur couldn’t use nukes for two reasons:
The radiation hazard symbol was created by members of a nuclear research group at Berkley in 1946. The symbol was adopted because it was simply, easy to discern at a distance, and symbolized radiation coming from an atomic nucleus. Kind of does look a film reel too though, never saw that before.
Fukushima is habitable a decade after the accident because
Total death toll from Three Mile Island: 0, though a slight uptick in cancer cases was detected in the surrounding area.
These answers are also logical, if nuclear weapons were a very effective propaganda tool. Of course that could be wrong, but there are enough inconsistencies for me to be increasingly skeptical of the conventional story regarding all things nuclear.
https://greatawakening.win/p/15IElxMNc4/nukes-and-truth-more-in-comments/c/
Also, https://rumble.com/vyw36g-the-nuclear-scare-scam.html
That's not what's happening with this post, though.