I don't remember too much of the specifics either, but they did try to argue charter violations, not the Bill of Rights, which is likely why the courts came to that decision.
Regardless, it's obscene to give people that kind of choice of "do you want to die with your illness, or do you want to risk your life to treat your illness with a treatment with the potential to kill?"
I don't remember too much of the specifics either, but they did try to argue charter violations, not the Bill of Rights, which is likely why the courts came to that decision.
Regardless, it's obscene to give people that kind of choice of "do you want to die with your illness, or do you want to risk your life to treat your illness with a treatment with the potential to kill?"