287
posted ago by Rexspeedworthy ago by Rexspeedworthy +289 / -2

... I deal with cash all day long and cannot find one with Janet yellen, or anything printed under the Biden administration

Comments (183)
sorted by:
47
bubble_bursts 47 points ago +49 / -2

Folks this is far bigger than most people here are imagining. This is not just a proof of Devolution (c'mon, I hope most of us here are way past demanding "proof" for something so obvious). This is the biggest clue as to what the coming financial meltdown / Fed implosion is going to look like.

Essentially, it looks like after Trump "took control of the Fed", they havent printed new federal reserve notes. All the trillions that have been printed all through 2019 until now - all of it has been numbers on the computer screens.

I have been scratching my brains trying to imagine how the Fed implosion will look like, and which part of the USD will stay and what part will implode. When other countries did things like this, it was very hard because they have to trace black market cash and get everyone to turn in their cash for new cash etc.

I think what Trump did is so simple its ridiculous. He just stopped printing new money. So everything thats in circulation that was created after 2017 is digital and can be traced.

So what they are doing is concentrating all these digital dollars (I call them "poof money" since they will go poof when the WHs pull a switch) into specific assets - like Black Rock for instances - so that when the time comes they all go poof.

This also means the USD cash (FERNs) that people have in their hands will not lose value due to the hyper inflation. The cash will become the new proper currency and whats on the computer systems - those will lose value.

TL;DR - Withdraw cash from your banks, and sit on your lawn chair with your beer and pop corn and watch the financial system collapse.

25
yldngo 25 points ago +25 / -0

Currency Fag.

36
bubble_bursts 36 points ago +36 / -0

Isnt it funny how many fags you become in the quest for truth!

23
metapriest 23 points ago +23 / -0

Truthfagging is the new datefagging

19
bubble_bursts 19 points ago +19 / -0

Truthfagging is the umbrella under which we do datefagging, planefagging, currencyfagging, mapfagging, weatherfagging etc

10
axrevolutionai 10 points ago +10 / -0

Don't forget boatfagging and astrofagging. I'd say don't forget plain fagging either but our gays aren't fags

5
Stinky_Stork 5 points ago +5 / -0

Was that gayfagging?

5
WeAreThePlan 5 points ago +5 / -0

Now I'm totally confused. But in a good way.

2
Callmejuls 2 points ago +2 / -0

The real meaning of the word that the freaks stole, just like they hijacked the rainbow. Gay actually means ‘Happy’

22
ILoveIvermectin 22 points ago +22 / -0

Central Banks and their “shareholders” are the real governments of the world. Once you understand that, everything else makes sense. - Lara Logan ( today)

6
bubble_bursts 6 points ago +6 / -0

Glad people are calling CBs out.

2
Litecola2 2 points ago +2 / -0

<X22 enters the chat>. kek

4
Callmejuls 4 points ago +5 / -1

Perhaps why God told me to make Camp Yesu a self sufficiency God reliant program and get away from man’s technology as much as possible.

1
Gr8ful69 1 point ago +1 / -0

Is it man's technology?

1
Callmejuls 1 point ago +1 / -0

Computer’s and crap, yeah

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
2
Callmejuls 2 points ago +2 / -0

Will be doing that when hubby gets home from AK fishing trip with my son tomorrow. I need his help. Have appointment lined up with attorney for advice as well on setting up PMA.

1
Callmejuls 1 point ago +1 / -0

You new here? I don’t recall seein your handle b4

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
3
PillarOfWisdom 3 points ago +3 / -0

I agree with you on the pre and post '17. What I'm not sure of is what happens to the regular person's digital numbers on the screen...401Ks, IRAs, etc. I have a hard time believing WHs would allow people to be hurt like that. If they did, that would give a new twist to suicide weekend. Thanks for your post.

3
bubble_bursts 3 points ago +3 / -0

This is pure speculation.

These are the assumptions:

  1. WHs would not allow normal people to hurt.

  2. Collapse of the fiat financial system is inevitable

  3. We are going to have to go to commodity/resource backed currency

  4. Everything that happens will be legal and organic at least in terms of optics.

[3] implies that after the collapse simplistically put, the total amount currency in circulation need to be divided by the total amount of resources (lets just call it precious metals) int he country to decide the value of the currency in terms of gold/silver. If all the money in the system (25T+) continues to exist, then an ounce of gold will probably be millions. This would mean that the average joe's money they have saved will be worthless.

[1] implies that not all 25T will continue to be in circulation. A HUGE chunk of it has to go before we can go back to the currency backed by precious metals.

[2] Nicely lends itself to make a huge chunk of this money go POOF. As long as all the dark money (that created by the Cabal for nefarious purposes) can be concentrated into one place, it will be easy to make it go poof.

Where would this be? The FED! and by its extension the Blackrock. So for a second lets assume that through some legal means all the money owned by FED/Blackrock is crushed to nothing (lets say by dumping all the stocks owned by Fed/Blackrock), and physically all the treasury notes representing this currency is defaulted upon this is what we will end up with:

  • Stock market crashed.

  • Fed and their gang left only with assets (Mortgage backed securites, real estate, farmland, Intellectual Property etc)

  • Everyone holding Treasuries will be holding worthless toilet paper

  • Most banks, exposed to all this will also go bankrupt

This kinda looks good, but 401k, savings accounts etc are all exposed to all this. So what happens?

Remember all those assets Fed and the gang have collected over the past few years with their easy money?

I believe the WHs will legally take over all that, pursuant to the EOs Trump signed (assets of anyone who has committed crimes against humanity) and that will be used to make the retirement and savings whole. HOWEVER, I do not believe they will make the entire savings whole. There is probably a limit (perhaps, FDIC limit, because of [4]) and beyond that if you had more savings, you might lose it.

Oh, all stocks people are holding most probably will go to zero, except perhaps things like GME/DWAC etc.

4
PillarOfWisdom 4 points ago +4 / -0

Excellent explanation. It's probably a good idea to buy some precious metals soon. I just posted this on the Preppers .win group: https://communities.win/c/Preppers/p/15IrPWmP4z/precious-metals--gold-silver-lea/c

People need to get ready.

2
bubble_bursts 2 points ago +2 / -0

Absolutely. I cannot think of any other way than this to safeguard your wealth.

But those who buy metals need to understand that its for the rainy day / for long term investment. They should not spend money that they would need in a hurry. For that, its better to keep cash on hand.

3
VetforTrump 3 points ago +3 / -0

Digital v paper.

3
special1ntere5t 3 points ago +3 / -0

If it ain’t written down it didn’t happen. Tom Clancy Debt of Honour. Looks like the WHs are going to pull a Jack Ryan to sort this whole financial shit show out

41
Rexspeedworthy [S] 41 points ago +41 / -0

I'm thinking maybe there is something to this devolution. I've been skeptical, but this is just one more thing....

20
enough_of_the_racism 20 points ago +20 / -0

Sorry to ruin all the currency fagging, but as noted below, the series date is just the first year that version was printed. There is no print date… Wikipedia - Series on US currency

22
Rubieroo 22 points ago +22 / -0

Also: something to remember: President Trump pulled the Federal Reserve into the US Treasury. And there it remains. It is not what it was.

Who controls the Treasury is the REAL question. I strongly suspect we are watching a controlled demolition, only the baddies think this serves them. It does not.

3
MAG768720 3 points ago +4 / -1

President Trump pulled the Federal Reserve into the US Treasury.

Sauce?

Because I do not believe that a private organization, which serves the purpose of controlling the money supply to benefit the criminal conspirators ... would just give it up. And the President does not have that constitutional authority.

So ...

Sauce?

5
-1
MAG768720 -1 points ago +1 / -2

That is speculation, not fact.

From the 2nd article:

This scheme essentially merges the Fed and Treasury into one organization

"Essentially" means "as if, but not actually."

The use of SPV's (Special Purpose Vehicles) where the US Treasury is the "owner" does not mean what you think it means.

The Fed also pays a 6% dividend to member banks, and "all profits" to the US Treasury, but that does not mean what you think it means.

You would have to see the contracts that are written between various parties to know for sure who is in doing what with the money.

You could legally own something, say a corporation. But you and I have a side agreement that says I control the corporation, and I take out a "management fee" or "consulting fee" or whatever we decide to call it of 99% of all net income, and THEN I pay you 100% of the "net profit."

By outside appearances, you get all the "net profit" and could say you are 100% owner. But that contract would reveal that I actually make 99% of the money.

2
Rubieroo 2 points ago +2 / -0

It was common knowledge at the time - not a secret at all.

Financiers that I know personally reacted in an odd way - they were slightly puzzled by the move, made vague excuses for why Trump would have done this, and then they forgot all about it. But it was massive and put President Trump in direct control of the Federal Reserve.

https://www.pinnacledigest.com/economy/trump-controls-federal-reserve/

https://www.investmentwatchblog.com/the-federal-reserve-the-treasury-just-merged-into-a-single-organization/

11
VetforTrump 11 points ago +11 / -0

Same point. There are none with yellens name

Why?

8
ShmellyTunaMelt1 8 points ago +8 / -0

just when things were starting to get faggy.....

2
Bedminster 2 points ago +2 / -0

So is there a new series beyond 2017?

31
deleted 31 points ago +33 / -2
10
KickingPugilist 10 points ago +10 / -0

Lmao

5
ILoveIvermectin 5 points ago +5 / -0

Joe Biden has been redefined as George Washington

1
Callmejuls 1 point ago +1 / -0

🤮🤮😡🔥

28
TripleBlack 28 points ago +31 / -3

For fucks guys, the year on cash is the series, like a version on the print. They haven't order a new design since 2017.

The feds has a order for 2.2 billion one dollars bill for 2022.

https://www.federalreserve.gov/paymentsystems/coin_currency_orders.htm

7
HunnyB 7 points ago +7 / -0

Well this makes sense because I definitely have been getting newly minted coins at work as well as money.

It's the year it's designed and not the year it's printed.

7
YeshuaSupreme 7 points ago +7 / -0

Bro I think you killed this thread.

3
TripleBlack 3 points ago +3 / -0

It needed to be put down, Old Yeller style.

1
YeshuaSupreme 1 point ago +1 / -0

There was no hope for it, it was suffering, you know we've got to do it.

4
Mandigo 4 points ago +4 / -0

Have they gone 5 years without printing a new series? I always thought they change the series every few years?

3
GizzardPuke 3 points ago +3 / -0

Very nice ! (Borat voice).

3
John_Mac_n_Cheese 3 points ago +3 / -0

This makes sense and I hope you get all the updoots.

20
Iqiljuh 20 points ago +21 / -1

Please sticky this. We need to find out if anyone can find a note newer than 2017.

4
Bidensbrain2020 4 points ago +4 / -0

I have bills signed by yellen but not sure how to tell the date of printing. They say series 2013 but I don't think that is the date of printing

5
GoatInTheHat 5 points ago +5 / -0

Can you post a picture of the bill?

4
Bidensbrain2020 4 points ago +4 / -0

Nevermind, I was wrong, it was signed by Jack Lew. I don't have any examples after all!

1
GoatInTheHat 1 point ago +1 / -0

Username checks out ;)

2
Bidensbrain2020 2 points ago +2 / -0

C'mon man! You know the thing!

1
VetforTrump 1 point ago +1 / -0

That means she was serving when that series was printed.

18
Kussdom 18 points ago +18 / -0

Probably because all the new money is being sent overseas!

7
Rooks 7 points ago +7 / -0

Valid theory.

We do have pictures of cash from overseas. Anyone see anything past 2017 A series?

16
Kilowatt2066 16 points ago +16 / -0

Remember supposedly Trump did something involving our currency

-1
myownEulogy -1 points ago +4 / -5

sauce? plz k thx bye

14
DontAsk 14 points ago +14 / -0

All my crispy bills are 2017. Very interesting . . .

-30
deleted -30 points ago +7 / -37
3
GizzardPuke 3 points ago +3 / -0

KEK.

14
Spac 14 points ago +14 / -0

I have 51 different bills 20s, 50s, 100s. Not a single bill over 2017. I have a 50 from 1996. Nothing over 2017.

11
deleted 11 points ago +11 / -0
3
special1ntere5t 3 points ago +3 / -0

Maybe this is the money go round with Ukraine? If they could t physically get hard US cash maybe they magicked up electronic US payments to somewhere like Ukraine who then converted to UKr currency that could be exchanged for USD? That would explain the whole push for Ukraine hysteria and sending so much “cash” to there??? Addendum- to clarify - if the black hats were unable to access physical new cash, if they magicked electronic dollars that were sent to UKr or similar then the recipient bank exchanged them for legal USD or gold/silver/diamonds etc already in circulation that sort of puts an extra step in the issuance of currency that the central banks need to keep the money spigot open - it could be a work around to circumvent if the actual issuing of cash was prohibited since 2017? It would explain why all the usual suspects are so gung Ho to send money to Ukraine under the guise of “war”. The EOs must have put a major hurt on the cabal finances so that’s been a way to replenish their cash reserves

3
ceegeegee 3 points ago +3 / -0

I did a tour of the Fed in SF the summer before CV. They said on the tour that 2/3rds of the dollars in circulation are outside the US.

2
special1ntere5t 2 points ago +2 / -0

Interdasting- so the whole Ukraine thing could be the DS trying to use Putins move to shut down bio weapons facilities as a boomerang opportunity to have a cash grab from other countries to replenish their cash reserves… 🤔🤔 activates the almonds doesn’t it?

2
Callmejuls 2 points ago +2 / -0

Perhaps the countries they are panhandling oil etc from are keeping those bills as proofs of their crimes against us and other countries.

9
dty6 9 points ago +9 / -0

I've noticed this before, too

even when I got some "new" bills from the bank, they were from 2017.

14
LoneWulf 14 points ago +15 / -1

I got some pristine "new" $20 bills out of the ATM about two weeks ago. They're dated 1996!

They must be cleaning out the warehouse, or something.

11
rma92 11 points ago +11 / -0

Just had that with some $100s... from 1983.

My friend seems to have used the same ATM and remarked that it was peculiar.

4
KickingPugilist 4 points ago +4 / -0

I would save one just because that's impressive unless they were printed with a backdated which is still worth holding.

4
Honor+Duty 4 points ago +4 / -0

Or maybe we think atms are dispensing cash but in reality they are printing.

4
GodzillaTrump 4 points ago +4 / -0

Like the old $100 bill design and everything?

3
Judiwont 3 points ago +3 / -0

Sell Them On eBay. Paper money is great fun to trade.

2
dty6 2 points ago +2 / -0

or something, right?

8
Stinky_Stork 8 points ago +8 / -0

just checked all currency i have on hand... lots of 2017 but nothing newer.

2
sackofwisdom 2 points ago +2 / -0

I have one that says "2017 A".

8
LucilleBrawl 8 points ago +8 / -0

Good question. All my bills are old.

8
FreedomFirst 8 points ago +10 / -2

2017 eh? There is that number again…..

7
Fatman 7 points ago +8 / -1

Mods; please sticky this. This seems very important.

9
ChronicMetamorphosis [M] 9 points ago +9 / -0

Two of you in the same post?

Review:

https://greatawakening.win/p/15Hv71ISl6/x/c/4OYXWkEhuGg

2
Fatman 2 points ago +2 / -0

When my phone dies, I grab my husband’s phone 😊.

1
Fatman 1 point ago +1 / -0

Sorry! I spoke before I read.

4
ChronicMetamorphosis 4 points ago +4 / -0

No big deal. I just want to make sure we're all getting what we want.

1
Fatman 1 point ago +1 / -0

Haven’t found any bills newer than 2017, either.

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
5
bubble_bursts 5 points ago +5 / -0

My guess is whatever has been printed after Biden came, its all just numbers on computer. Not actual physical notes.

5
307Sleeper 5 points ago +5 / -0

Very interesting?

5
TwistedTrees 5 points ago +5 / -0

Lot of bills in various denominations - 2017 is the latest date, even on the bills that feel new.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
j3msos3 1 point ago +1 / -0

The 17th letter of the alphabet

5
Splinter777 5 points ago +5 / -0

I just went to the bank and got out $500 in $20s and some more random cash - non of it is newer then 2017 🤔

3
UltimateMastermind 3 points ago +3 / -0

Older or 2017+?

5
Splinter777 5 points ago +5 / -0

There was 2013, 2009, 2004 ect. but nothing past 2017

2
Splinter777 2 points ago +2 / -0

fixed it :)

2
Greatheart 2 points ago +2 / -0

They could have been printed after 2017. It's just that 2017 is the last series. You would think the Dems would change that if they could.

1
Splinter777 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes I do - it is strange and that number again 😉

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
5
Suckitreddit 5 points ago +5 / -0

It was my understanding that coins are minted by the US Treasury, but bills are “Federal Reserve Notes”

I just went through stacks. Nothing after 2017A series.

Could it be? So simple, so elegant. Right in front of your face. Enjoy the show?

ENJOY THE SHOW!

4
TDanonDJTJR2024 4 points ago +4 / -0

bruh nah they only change the year on the note if they change the design. unlike coins. no redesigns since 2017 so theyre still being printed. still interesting in a 17 sense

1
Suckitreddit 1 point ago +1 / -0

Interesting. Thanks.

2
TDanonDJTJR2024 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yeah I got all giddy excited til I realized that was in fact the case after another user pointed it out

1
KickingPugilist 1 point ago +1 / -0

I believe there are far more recent coins.

1
John_Mac_n_Cheese 1 point ago +1 / -0

I had a 2020 quarter the other day. With 2 bats on the back.

0
Furecrotch 0 points ago +1 / -1

Not true for quarters, but I wonder if the newer coins are made from silver?!

2
erefernow 2 points ago +2 / -0

No

1
Furecrotch 1 point ago +1 / -0

Thanks for checking anyways.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
4
PattyFromTexas 4 points ago +4 / -0

Just looked through all our bills and found nothing more recent than 2017.

4
kingbird 4 points ago +4 / -0

Same. I just looked through hundreds of small denomination bills. Nothing after 2017.

4
patriotnrse 4 points ago +4 / -0

I have a 5 dollar Kennedy bill that I keep to prove that the he printed bills from The United States Treasury instead of the Federal Reserve.

3
BigMuddyMama 3 points ago +3 / -0

I have a 2013 $20 and a 2017 $1.

4
94f450d 4 points ago +4 / -0

I got a couple 2017 $20 and a 2013 $1 and $5

3
PresElectDeezNuts 3 points ago +3 / -0

wow. nothing newer than 2017. 👀

3
UltimateMastermind 3 points ago +3 / -0

Some numismatist would spot this this years ago..?

6
Blandeaux 6 points ago +6 / -0

What retards look at the money thinking "they haven't printed paper money in a while?" 🍻😂

2
Suckitreddit 2 points ago +2 / -0

I guess the retards on this board…who may have just cracked something big.

3
dec3169 3 points ago +3 / -0

The lack of her signature on bills is a nothingburger. Yellen's signature can't legally be on the currency until a new Treasurer is appointed. Biden said he was appointing a Native American woman in late June (Marilynn Malerba) but as far as I can tell he has not yet appointed her and the office is still vacant. Every article I looked at says Biden announced his intent to appoint her, but even the article in the front page of treasury.gov says things such as "will become" or "will serve". The Treasurer position no longer requires a Senate confirmation so I don't know what the hold-up is.

Yellen sat for her official signature last year, and until a Treasurer is in office new bills will still have Mnuchin's signature on them.

None of this means that Devolution is or is not happening, nor does it mean Biden is or is not legitimate. It simply means a Treasurer is not in office to sit for their signature so the plates can be finished. It may be an excuse to cover for something, but it is a legal one.

Source - search for Yellen Signature Currency and pick any article.

4
CQVFEFE 4 points ago +4 / -0

The lack of her signature on bills is a nothingburger

Like the entire thread.

Of course no one has a later series bill than 2017. There hasn't been a redesign since then.

3
proforma1 3 points ago +3 / -0

All those bills have been shipped to Ukraine, none are here in the U.S.😎

3
Kussdom 3 points ago +4 / -1

Could it be because of the New design? US Treasury confirms Harriet Tubman $20 bill is coming — but here's why you'll have to wait. EXCLUSIVE: In an internal department Black History Month message exclusively obtained by theGrio, Secretary Janet Yellen reaffirmed the commitment to ensure an inclusive currency.Feb 13, 2022

4
moodyblue 4 points ago +4 / -0

If you get money with a picture you don’t ask for another one.🤣 My uncle told me about an old lady he knew that refused a five dollar bill because it had Lincoln on it. He was born in 1940 and I’m thinking this woman was alive during the Cival War.

4
BadMamaJama 4 points ago +4 / -0

I couldn't find why there are no bills dated after 2017 but Janet Yellens signature is not on the bills because Biden has not appted a confirmed Treasury Secy yet. Once both slots are filled, the signatures will go on new bills. NY times article

4
Rexspeedworthy [S] 4 points ago +4 / -0

New York times, that's a ringing endorsement. I prefer the answer to be more nefarious thank you. 😂

4
DidYouKnow 4 points ago +4 / -0

I can't read the article but is this something that is common? He's had 18 months to get someone appointed.

2
Greatheart 2 points ago +2 / -0

I already read that. I don't buy it at all. The treasury sec. does not need congress. Biden just picks somebody and that's that. Maybe he is just too busy falling off his bike.

2
Mister_Winston 2 points ago +2 / -0

It was easy for Yellen to commit to that when she knew there would be no way to deliver it before the dollar collapses.

2
GodSaveOurChildren 2 points ago +2 / -0

No bc the rainbow currency is coming out soon. JFK is on the $20 I heard, bunch of great leaders on them.

2
ifififififokiedokie 2 points ago +2 / -0

Damn this is interesting

2
Bedminster 2 points ago +2 / -0

You're correct. I have never seen a newer bill past 2017. Lest see who can find a 2020-2022 series bill.

2
Q4theWIIN 2 points ago +2 / -0

BOOM 💕

2
HelpDonny 2 points ago +2 / -0

Wow, interesting observation!

2
VetforTrump 2 points ago +2 / -0

U.s. treasury owns the fed since 2018 April 15. Trump out them there.

2
Wretchedwisdom 2 points ago +2 / -0

I have a $1 bill from 1981!

40 year old single dollar still in circulation?? In good condition as well! Weird!

2
Oasis5150 2 points ago +2 / -0

I have 2022 quarters

2
Dogelog 2 points ago +2 / -0

Quarters are minted by the treasury not the federal reserve

0
TreadUponThem 0 points ago +1 / -1

And notice how gay they made Washington look on the new quarters. Wtf.

2
erefernow 2 points ago +2 / -0

That was a design from 1932. It was the design most actually wanted at the time but someone over ruled the commission recommendation to give us the one we are more familiar with.

1
TreadUponThem 1 point ago +1 / -0

Thank you fren. Interesting to know.

2
Lupinate 2 points ago +2 / -0

https://dealbreaker.com/2022/06/yellens-name-coming-to-money-near-you

So someone is reporting on it this year, and no, her sig isnt out yet.

2
Huckleberry1776 2 points ago +2 / -0

Go to the bank and make a withdrawal. Should be crisp new bills right?

1
MW_Freedom 1 point ago +1 / -0

Just adding one more confirmation. I have more cash in my wallet at the moment than I usually do. I just went through all the 1s, 5s, 10s, 20s, and 50s. Not a single one with a series after 2017.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
valley-lily 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm pretty sure I've had some that had Janet Yellen printed as the Treasury Secretary and I laughed at it.

1
Rooks 1 point ago +1 / -0

Confirmed, we have fresh notes, or thought was fresh. Nothing newer than series 2017 A.

1
georock 1 point ago +1 / -0

i just checked and all my thousand dollar bills are from 1969

1
Manilla 1 point ago +1 / -0

Idk. But I do know the date on paper money doesn't mean that's the year it was printed. It means that's the year the design was last revised. So until the design gets revised again, you'll see 2017 bills printed off. Perhaps a different signature counts as a design change, perhaps it doesn't. Idk.

1
Hakencruze1 1 point ago +1 / -0

Hey I’m in Australia Australian with $2000 in u.s cash is it going to be worthless?