Pelosi's trip to Taiwan normally would never provoke a hostile response from China...unless...
🤔💭 Theory 😲💡
Biden is already out, Kamala is ineligible to take presidency, and Pelosi's is now acting as President.
Is this the Change of Batter comms we've been looking for?
She didn’t say she was going to Taiwan. She said she was going to tie one on.
Bombastic hype was met with bombastic hype.
The China military exercise allows the AF to decline going there due to procedural or safety rules, an excuse ready-made.
But yeah, I have no idea who is still alive at this point. Not even videos are proof of life now. So I guess I will just watch the movie unfold.
What authority would a speaker of the house even have in regards to international affairs?
Plus Biden got double COVID.
She is the head of the House, which gives her some measure of diplomatic significance when it comes to internal affairs. I don't know the specifics though. I think they don't want Nancy over there because she's trying to take the tech investments she's got there back home. They won't let her get away with that
The other theory is that she maybe HAD to leave the US temporarily, as in she is being detained for her safety.
😱
President you say? Is that the scare event everyone is talking about?
Hmm
Can anyone elaborate on Kamala? I've heard this, because she's not a natural born citizen, right?
But would that stop her from being 'acting' President?
From my view of recent history, kamala should be ineligible, but unless the military has truly stepped in silently on the order of secession questions, nobody else is going to stop her from taking up the position illegitimately.
The reason I believe she would be unchallenged is the same as the reason Obama was unchallenged even though he was ineligible to be President. So at this point only the military would be a possibility for willingness to enforce that requirement in the Constitution.
They, the military, didn’t force any requirements towards Barry. Kamollera wouldn’t even be challenged.
She was born in the US to Canadian parents. Her family moved back to Canada when she was still very young, so she didn't grow up here. So it's not the "natural-born" part; it's the citizenship part. Some people believe that if you were raised in another country and "not subject to US law" (that's the key part), then you aren't a citizen. It's a good theory to deny citizenship to anchor babies, and it is soundly based in the constitution, and seems totally legitimate to me, but in practice the immigration service has always acted like the birth certificate is enough. So that's why people say she's not eligible, while others assume she is.
God help us if this is true.