This is a better look at each subject who had an adverse effect, several pages for each so not 3500 victims. First one had a medical history that would make it easy to gloss over the fatal heart attack 2 mos. after 2nd dose--especially with no autopsy. I'm wondering already if there was some cherry picking of cases that could be swept under the rug the same way.
The placebo pts are shocking me. Did these patients CONSENT to be in the placebo group? Did they CONSENT to being part of an EXPERIMENT? I'm thinking this is a pretty big find!
3600 pages of adverse effect narratives. It lists the patients medical history and a description of the adverse event/why they think it happened.
https://pdata0916.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/pdocs/070122/125742_S1_M5_5351_c4591001-fa-interim-narrative-sensitive.pdf
This is a better look at each subject who had an adverse effect, several pages for each so not 3500 victims. First one had a medical history that would make it easy to gloss over the fatal heart attack 2 mos. after 2nd dose--especially with no autopsy. I'm wondering already if there was some cherry picking of cases that could be swept under the rug the same way.
also, given placebo
What I'm saying. It looks like a pretty good medical record, but they lost a lot of data already, so who knows how good it really is.
The placebo pts are shocking me. Did these patients CONSENT to be in the placebo group? Did they CONSENT to being part of an EXPERIMENT? I'm thinking this is a pretty big find!