My guess is that having this come from a CIA guy gives it credibility. Without this story, it's just a myth. If the Feds are taking crustal slippage seriously, the rest of us should as well. I did my part by leaving LA. Should be safe where I am, a mile high.
Much like the mutation of a virus, you can't predict these sort of things. There is evidence in the geologic record of pole reversal, and of the crust turning 90 degrees. Anyone who claims to know WHEN it may occur has a hand in trying to make it happen.
Why would that cause redaction? This hypothesis has been out there since 1953 ....
My guess is that having this come from a CIA guy gives it credibility. Without this story, it's just a myth. If the Feds are taking crustal slippage seriously, the rest of us should as well. I did my part by leaving LA. Should be safe where I am, a mile high.
indeed. Since it already was public knowledge due to plublications by Charles Hapgood.
And another thought is, right now, the ECD is labeled as pseudoscience. So, whence cometh the hiding of a hypothesis, that may or may not manifest?
Would that act of censure not lend credence to the idea?
Much like the mutation of a virus, you can't predict these sort of things. There is evidence in the geologic record of pole reversal, and of the crust turning 90 degrees. Anyone who claims to know WHEN it may occur has a hand in trying to make it happen.
The latter is certainly an interesting supposition.