Making statements that "No, It Was Not Planned" is a statement of opinion without supporting evidence. I'm not saying that you're wrong, but you seem to be, with your sticky power, attempting to set people's minds on a specific line of thinking, rather than adding your own opinion as your own opinion, and trying to support that opinion with meaningful evidence.
This is how propaganda works. You get an "authority" to make an "official announcement" and it sets thinking along a certain line.
If things are allowed to be organic however, people will investigate, they will present their evidence, and they will come to their own conclusions. No Ministry of Truth required.
I’m stating what I did because due to flow of highway traffic and spent 15 years working with law enforcement. To plan a direct and perfect target head on collision on a flowing highway unless it’s a movie set is like 1-10,000 chance to get it correct. And this accident surly does not looked planned nor as fishy as the Uvalde School Shooting. I’m pretty sure by all current reports this was an actual car accident. And I’m admitting now I could be wrong down the road. But all current reports show this was a regular flowing road and traffic, not a movie set.
it would do well of all of us to remember that this place is full of anons on a regular basis, and that that sets a certain bar on conclusions and the general debate.
while i respect what you do, and the time you put in, your tone and your level of respect for people here just fukking suck today. i will assume that is not ordinarily the case and hope for the best.
Making statements that "No, It Was Not Planned" is a statement of opinion without supporting evidence. I'm not saying that you're wrong, but you seem to be, with your sticky power, attempting to set people's minds on a specific line of thinking, rather than adding your own opinion as your own opinion, and trying to support that opinion with meaningful evidence.
This is how propaganda works. You get an "authority" to make an "official announcement" and it sets thinking along a certain line.
If things are allowed to be organic however, people will investigate, they will present their evidence, and they will come to their own conclusions. No Ministry of Truth required.
I’m stating what I did because due to flow of highway traffic and spent 15 years working with law enforcement. To plan a direct and perfect target head on collision on a flowing highway unless it’s a movie set is like 1-10,000 chance to get it correct. And this accident surly does not looked planned nor as fishy as the Uvalde School Shooting. I’m pretty sure by all current reports this was an actual car accident. And I’m admitting now I could be wrong down the road. But all current reports show this was a regular flowing road and traffic, not a movie set.
and?
you are still making a judgement call that is possibly unwarranted.
excuse the lot of us if we just don't take your word for it and are waiting for some real SAUCE.
By all means go research then your highness. I shall bow as I leave the room for fucks sake.
let's simplify.
it would do well of all of us to remember that this place is full of anons on a regular basis, and that that sets a certain bar on conclusions and the general debate.
while i respect what you do, and the time you put in, your tone and your level of respect for people here just fukking suck today. i will assume that is not ordinarily the case and hope for the best.