281
Comments (36)
sorted by:
19
NotACop 19 points ago +19 / -0

His follow-up statement to posting that video was hilarious.

https://twitter.com/damonimani/status/1555585579408039939?s=20&t=-sF41ywJ-rUXs_zd4vWI2g

7
BrotherAmerica 7 points ago +7 / -0

... Epstein, who killed himself... ... Dangerous to our democracy... Lol

5
MileHiLife 5 points ago +6 / -1

I watched it but unsure if it's "hilarious" or if [they] got to him and threatened arkencide

4
ThinQ 4 points ago +4 / -0

Right? He literally reads "Repeat the line" like the Potatus reading verbatim off the teleprompter. The way he kept looking up at something made me wonder if he was looking at a monitor of some goon holding a gun to one of his loved-one's head unless he read the script they prepared for him. Hopefully he's just doing this to avoid the legal jackals who might come after him.

6
kotis 6 points ago +6 / -0

that was, in fact, the joke

2
ThinQ 2 points ago +2 / -0

Ah... Thanks. Apparently I just expect the worst from the left and their lawyer jackals at times. 🤨

1
atpoker 1 point ago +1 / -0

It’s hilarious. You’re literally autistic. Which is ok.

1
MileHiLife 1 point ago +1 / -0

I might've missed something... was at work, kinda rushed it but will have to dig it up again?

If only I were a true autist...

2
dbsupernova 2 points ago +2 / -0

Now that's funny.

15
Papatriot12 15 points ago +15 / -0

If he's controlled opposition then he's failed. He woke me up 20 years ago...along with many friends and family.

7
atpoker 7 points ago +7 / -0

Alex jones is a good guy. End of story.

4
smartbaum 4 points ago +4 / -0

if you think he's failed perhaps that actually means he's succeeded after all.. .

5
Papatriot12 5 points ago +5 / -0

That depends on what side you're on.

8
Datadude 8 points ago +8 / -0

I struggle in understanding Jones and associate's roll in all of this. He is responsible for many starting down the path of awareness, while it may be the "clift note comic book version" of what we know, it is still a start, and everyone starts somewhere.

And if Jones is Mosd / DS, then that brings into question all his associates as well, including Adams and his entourage, also responsible for many years of red pilling.

I won't deny the profit motivation for both, but willing to tolerate the monetisation of the platforms to pay the bills, but then again we are talking about the possibilities of potential profit windfalls, so.

I'm just not sure of the roll they have to play.

3
smartbaum 3 points ago +3 / -0

while it may be the "clift note comic book version" of what we know, it is still a start, and everyone starts somewhere.

It can also just as often be an end.

It's very obvious that whatever information is passed through AJ, whether accurate or disinfo, feeds into and is filtered by a very specific temperament that AJ seeks to impose upon his audience: histrionic Manichean view of the world "us" (middle class normal folk sheep) vs "them" (a monolithic elite class with seemingly limitless power and purely self interested oppressors of "us"). The problem is that is not how reality bears out. There is no single monolithic "deep state" cabal with top tier administrators and singular purpose.

And I'm guessing AJ is not big on discussing the topic of how often and easily big names in the alternative media space are funded by, controlled by, or surreptiously guided by the very same entities or sympathetic entities that are the target of these media personalities' vitriol.

So no that is NOT a good start because its entraining people who are "waking up" how NOT to critically think, but rather accept the most emotionally convincing alternative narratives out there that give them meaning and directs their anxiety and outrage to pre-determined targets. This is still potentially another version of mass formation psychosis.

And the Hegelian historical dialectic rolls on and on and on ...

1
Datadude 1 point ago +1 / -0

All your points valid friend, however I made no reference to good or bad just "a start"

it is still a start, and everyone starts somewhere.

But it begs to question, are bad starts better than no starts at all ?

I've listened to and or read AJ since the early 2000s when few were "going there".

And what is even more concerning to me, Mike Adams who being a food nutritionist, having read and reference his stuff about GMOs and glyphosates for at least 15 years.

In both cases the bulk of their information has proven to be useful, and more importantly a spring board to dig deeper (hence the clift notes).

Is there a preferred pedigree of intellectual evolution, perhaps, but lots of us mutts and mongrels happily coexist out here as well. I for one believe there may be many paths to the summit's plateau.

The emotional manipulation aspect is disturbing, and a useful marketing tool at the same time. No one can argue they are not playing the audience, the only question, to what end?

I do chuckle when I see the "trigger warnings" applied to AJs or Adams links, are we too so fragile we need our "safe spaces" ?

Without question you have presented compelling considerations for all to ponder, thank you.

1
Greekish 1 point ago +1 / -0

I struggle in understanding Jones and associate's roll

Maybe you could understand his role?

1
Datadude 1 point ago +1 / -0

Might be a good start, but I was on such a roll.. LOL

Don't sweat the small stuff friend, life's to short.

Mobile phone access only, dyslectic, auditory deficiencies, small screen, bad eyes, auto correct set on psycho, etc. etc.

If you choose to be my "proof reader" I promise you much work,

if you hope to "educate" me, good luck, it's been a 60 year struggle.

if your intention is to "shame" me, take a number and stand in line, I suggest you bring a lunch and plan on being awhile.

Don't sweat the small stuff friend, was my meaning lost on you ? Did you need clarification ? In the end does it really matter ?

6
HunnyB 6 points ago +6 / -0

I'm starting to get the feeling this is a don't make me go into that briar patch there situation.

I don't hate him but he is Mossad and not on our side but damn if he isn't right about a lot.

4
Queef_Anon 4 points ago +4 / -0

Its just like the serpent in the garden, mixing a lie with abundant truth in order to deceive.

You can be right about a lot and still be Satan.

3
Ang77 3 points ago +3 / -0

No one can convince me this is a real court hearing, this is as scripted as the Amber Heard thing, IMO.

2
GuerroRanchero 2 points ago +2 / -0

Haha!

2
amarQ144 2 points ago +2 / -0

Bahahaha

2
Godisglory1 2 points ago +2 / -0

This a pure propaganda something is up. Eyes on Durham maybe?

2
russiah 2 points ago +2 / -0

The tweet owner just came out to “apologize for the misinformation”. 😉

2
dty6 2 points ago +2 / -0

love it!

2
SaltyBrit 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'd believe AJ over Clintons any day. They are guilty as fuck.

1
TheJake 1 point ago +1 / -0

If he flipped and is part of the assist in takedown...he will deserve serious props. To be continued...

1
russiah 1 point ago +1 / -0

Why flip if he is on the right side

1
Hayle 1 point ago +1 / -0

Because he is suspected to be controlled opposition (mossad) according to Q. Either way very solid sound bite out of this hearing

2
TheJake 2 points ago +2 / -0

Ding. Yep...intentionally runs as many possible back to MSM for info (just his delivery method alone). I anticipated his trial being fake, with him playing along to scare people away from calling out hoax mass shootings...clips like this could mean there's a deeper play. We'll see.

1
SeeAreJay 1 point ago +1 / -0

They probly sat him down with a photo of his kids in crosshairs and said stap noticing things GOY...or else

He sometimes blurts it out and (((notices))) but its always ChiComm this or Elite that

2
atpoker 2 points ago +2 / -0

Disinformation is necessary .

1
SovereignSon 1 point ago +1 / -0

Let's see the list

1
Iceman80 1 point ago +1 / -0

What list?

2
SovereignSon 2 points ago +2 / -0

Everyone that got serviced on the island

1
dakinnia 1 point ago +1 / -0

Scripted or not, that reply is DEADLY.

1
Mycovidfeelslikeacol 1 point ago +1 / -0

Does that mean we can have a class action lawsuit against Anderson Cooper, don lemon, maddow, etc. for getting info wrong on covid and telling us to wear masks and isolate given this was false info and damaged people?