If the incumbent is the de facto party choice, why would the voting numbers be that high? The motivation for people to vote wouldn't be there. Look at Governor Walz, AG Ellison for example. Minnesota isn't necessarily a solid blue State. So, why are the Democrat voting tallies so much higher than Republicans? In Ilhan Omar case, she got that magic 51% that always makes me suspicious. We see the very same thing with WI Robin Vos who is greatly hated in his district, but somehow got 51% of the vote. The very small number of total votes compared to the population of his district is also strange.
Not legally possible? Can you be more clear on what makes it not legal? The Sheriff department there to an investigation on the convalescent home fraud and recommended prosecution.
I believe, according to Wisconsin law, a vote challenge is only possible when the spread is 1% or less. Do not pursecute me if I'm wrong, this is from memory.
No intention there. I'm just curious. However, yet this doesn't sound correct. Why? What if there's evidence of cheating and fraud? Someone commented on canvassing. I think if people show evidence it can happen.
Yeah, ok but millions were spent here and given to a former Wi Federal court Judge, who definitively proved election fraud, as well as "True the vote" testimony and evidence and yet Robin Vos (GOP speaker of the house) does fuck all.
If the incumbent is the de facto party choice, why would the voting numbers be that high? The motivation for people to vote wouldn't be there. Look at Governor Walz, AG Ellison for example. Minnesota isn't necessarily a solid blue State. So, why are the Democrat voting tallies so much higher than Republicans? In Ilhan Omar case, she got that magic 51% that always makes me suspicious. We see the very same thing with WI Robin Vos who is greatly hated in his district, but somehow got 51% of the vote. The very small number of total votes compared to the population of his district is also strange.
I would like to see a forensic challenge on Robin Vos but I do not think that is legally possible.
Not legally possible? Can you be more clear on what makes it not legal? The Sheriff department there to an investigation on the convalescent home fraud and recommended prosecution.
I believe, according to Wisconsin law, a vote challenge is only possible when the spread is 1% or less. Do not pursecute me if I'm wrong, this is from memory.
No intention there. I'm just curious. However, yet this doesn't sound correct. Why? What if there's evidence of cheating and fraud? Someone commented on canvassing. I think if people show evidence it can happen.
Yeah, ok but millions were spent here and given to a former Wi Federal court Judge, who definitively proved election fraud, as well as "True the vote" testimony and evidence and yet Robin Vos (GOP speaker of the house) does fuck all.