I have to admit <gulp> that I'm rethinking the Alex Jones thing.

It's a crazy game out there. And sure, controlled opposition exists. No doubt.

But an important question is, does Jones have a net overall positive or negative effect?

I'm re-evaluating my views on him, based on a few factors:

a) (as far as I know) Unlike Jerome Corsi, Q never directly indicated that Jones is a mossad agent. Rather, Q directly implied that Jones was attempting to hijack the Q operation for self-benefit. "Swindler" was one term used.

b) Again, AFAIK, Jones and infowoz were a big factor in the lead up to the 2016 election and seemed to play a very important role in building groundswell under TRump's candidacy. Example, in my own case, it was only after DJT was elected in 2016 that I began to seriously look at the concept of 'alt-media'. Infowars appears to have been the soft, chewy, more easily digestible reddish pill that a lot of patriots and later anons actually got started with.

c) Jones is clearly an actor. Even his lawyer testified as much at the divorce-related trial. bad actor? Probably. Egotistical? Sure. Filled with his own importance? Seems obvious.

Until harder evidence comes to light, and until a more clear net-evil affect becomes apparent, I'm more inclined to think that Jones is a flawed, egotistical but fundamentally patriotic-inclined actor, showman out to make lots of bucks, but who inadvertently has actually had a net-positive affect but making alternative news and 'conspiracy theory' type stuff front and center in the mainstream.

Hard to do that without being sensationalist, which Jones clearly is. Sure, he became the poster boy for the tin-foil hat cliche, but at the same time, provided an easily accessible avenue for waking up types to cut their teeth on, too.

With all of that, for me, the jury is out on Jones. I used to be die-in-the-wool convinced he's controlled opp, but now I'm open to other possible views too. And, I think that's OK, too. It's merely due diligence. It's almost anon 'doctrine' now that Jones is Mosad Controlled OPP, but Q never exhorted us to adopt views based on authority or doctrine. So, I'm happy keeping an open and questioning mind re: Jones.

And, if he IS controlled opposition, then the question can also be asked, WHO is controlling him NOW?

So many actors in this movie. carry on .

Probably the deepest controlled opposition, whose job it is to push people to the sheep pens after we hit the precipice and there is chaos everywhere. Happy to be proven wrong.

As long as people verify everything they hear on InfoWars independantly and do not believe anything at face value, they will be fine.