TWA 800 Whistleblower revealing that a missile was fired and that they hit a target thought to be an "Airbus"; Note that this was in 1996 right before the election, used by Hillary/Bill Clinton to set the false narrative of "terrorist attacks on American soil". FALSE FLAG!
(www.americanthinker.com)
🏳️ FALSE FLAG 👮
Comments (4)
sorted by:
there was this one family from ct they all blew up {i think except the dad}and i always felt they were the target or a signal to someone else that this could be you and yours next
There is some evidence that at least one person on the flight was a target of Hillary Clinton for revealing pedophilia information. It is likely there was more than one. This is standard cabal practice to put people they want to get rid of on a plane and then crash it.
Look at the Malaysia airline plane that "disappeared". All of the patent holders for a chip patent on one flight goes down, and then a Rothschild magically ends up with the patent rights? Not credible that it was not "arranged".
Modern aircraft are extremely safe and reliable, and it is almost impossible to crash one without sabotage, shooting it down, or intentionally doing it.
Too long not gonna write- had a friend back then who worked for FAA searching wreckage for clues- he worked that flight. He got super drunk 1 nite and admitted evidence of missile; and nobody was allowed to talk about it--like signed papers and stuff He didnt remember he talked that nite(we think?) Was really weird after- hindsight? Pretty sure he had PTSD
I remember that event, which I followed closely. Lots of eyewitnesses and circumstantial evidence to place a Navy guided missile frigate near the flight path of the aircraft (Boeing 747-100).
The official verdict was an explosion of fuel vapors in the central body tank. This had never happened before, and the fuel-air concentration in that tank would not have been conducive to such an explosion (at best, a deflagration).
Two anomalous items of data were never explained: (1) the aiplane's sudden drop in altitude (as recorded by an aneroid barometer), and (2) the airplane's sudden drop in speed (as recorded by the pitot tube, also aneroid barometer).
It occurred to me that the anomalous data items would have been perfectly explained by an external explosion and its blast wave, which in reflecting off the airplane body would momentarily increase the Static Pressure of the atmosphere. Increased static pressure measured by an aneroid barometer would be interpreted as a lower altitude (higher pressure). It also would be interpreted by a pitot tube as a lower airspeed (lower ratio of dynamic pressure to static pressure). I do not recall these insights ever being mentioned. (My background is in aerodynamics and gas dynamics.)
I think it is fairly evident that a Navy vessel mistakenly engaged a civilian transport, and the government (Clinton administration) was determined to cover up responsibility. I think there are senior Navy officers who are culpable in the concealment of manslaughter who need to be court-marshaled and punished. (An error like this happened in 1988 with Iran Air 655, Reagan administration.)