Watch for them. Some are even here on G/A:
Theres a feeling in the air like many top right wing Influencers/Pundits/Journalists/Politicians etc, are gearing up to Turn on President Trump. Alex Jones was the indicator.
They will use the Pandemic as their "in" while conviently forgetting that Trump didnt thrust this upon us, his enemies did (see Event201) And sometimes during crisis there are no right answers, only mitigating damage...
Whoever turns on Trump will reveal themselves as a deep state plant.
We've watched them reveal themselves in waves. Each year there's a new group who've clearly gotten their orders to blow their cover and try and sway as many of their followers as possible.
The final wave is coming. With some of the biggest names in the business. They have no choice. The fact that they held Alex Jones back for this long means they didn't want to burn these assets. But we've grown regardless. It's their only hope. Don't fall for it.
t.me/realjust_human/8886
So let’s do the calculations. I have the formula from that webpage you sent and just need the data the formula requires and we’ll be on our way.
Could you please provide the information that connects to this formula they reference?
-rate of formation of stars in the galaxy
-fraction of those stars with planetary systems
-number of planets per solar system with an environment suitable for life
-fraction of suitable life planets on which life actually appears
-fraction of life bearing planets on which intelligent life emerges (you can even count the planet on which you reside here)
-fraction of civilizations that develop a technology that releases detectable signs of their existence into space
-length of time such civilizations release detectable signals into space
Now I just need that data to plug into your formula please. And like you said, the math will prove this out.
I can make this much easier for you to understand. Imagine you live in a cave in the middle of the Amazon rain forest. You have never seem another human being. In your unchosen ignorance you assume that you are the only one. Words like city, sister, brother, mom, dad, fire hose, pizza... enormous list, have absolutely no meaning to you. They don't exist. Your assumption becomes an absolute belief. And that is, "you are alone in the universe" and you are all there is. Yet, us, or the rest of us, know your assumption is wrong thus your belief is wrong. But you don't know that you don't know. That is where you are in this discussion.
Find an old copy of a book called "Flatlands" it illustrates the same logical beliefs that exist between dimensions. To a two dimensional creature the 3rd dimension doesn't exist. In fact it has no language to even describe a 3 dimensional world which is all of us and our world. Now take us in a 3 dimensional world and we then make the same set of wrong assumptions about the 4th and 5th dimensional world, that is... they don't exist. Yet today, we know they do.
So don't confuse yourself by trying to comprehend the math. Think with a small amount of logic and that is all you need.
Why don’t you quote the article you linked to and explain that, with logic, rather than moving on to another irrelevant metaphor?
Show me your ability to read, comprehend, and apply your own intellect and logic by quoting and discussing the article you shared.
You could go to their formula and explain the logic behind the data (pretending it exists - you don’t even have to give real numbers) to apply in the formula to “do math.”
You can’t. Because the article is comms and irrational nonsense that is intended to communicate one meaning to those who are comms aware and to put a veneer of intellectualism (faux) for the sheep. If you can’t see that, you should delete your Pepe.
Gees. I do it on a spreadsheet and post the image. Busy today. Next week.
I’m sure you’ll get around to it, given the significance of being the first to prove life exists on other planets.
You used the word math in your original comment and this one.
However, to “do math” is more than just saying the magic word, “math.”
Perhaps you should follow the science. Clearly you think you do.