'NASA'
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (129)
sorted by:
Neil Armstrong, Don Petit, and Leroy Chiao, all astronauts who have been to space, give three contradictory answers to the question of whether or not we can see stars while in cislunar space. Three contradictory answers to what should be a simple observation of a physical phenomenon is an impossibility if they are not lying. The moon isn’t a rocky body. It is plasma. You shouldn’t see a crescent moon and the sun together in the sky. The masons are losing their grip.
They give conflicting reports because each astronaut operated in different lighting conditions at different points in their missions, and only certain lighting conditions allow for the starlight to not be washed out either by sunlight or the interior spacecraft lights. How well can you see starlight inside a car with the window rolled up and with all the interior lights on? Just because each astronaut couldn't always see the stars doesn't invalidate any of their testimony.
The Moon absolutely is a rocky body, not a plasma. We can measure the Moon's mass and density by its gravitational interactions with Earth, and it's density is far too high to be plasma. Plus the Moon wouldn't have enough gravity to hold that plasma together, and it would have cooled off and dispersed by now. Also, we have rock samples from the Moon because we've actually been there.
Bonus question: If the Moon is a plasma, why are its surface features constant? Plasma is a fluid like gases and liquids, so any surface features should be constantly shifting around like the clouds on Jupiter and Saturn.
"You shouldn't see a crescent moon and the sun together in the sky"
There is no reason why you shouldn't be able to see that. As a matter of fact, the Moon is closer to the sun from our perspective in its crescent phases than its fuller phases. If you don't understand how moon phases work, then I really don't know what to tell you.
Lol I like how the moons gravity overrides the larger earths to pull the oceans even though the earth is closer. They gave contradictory answers about whether or not we can see stars while in cislunar space, not accounts of their point of view at the time. They were asked if seeing stars in cislunar space was possible. They gave impossible answers. Crepuscular rays prove the sun is small and local. The moon lighting up the clouds around it prove it is small and local. You can measure the moons light and it is colder than the shade. There is a black sun at the center of the flat earth.
The Moon's gravity does not "override" Earth's gravity. The Earth's gravity exerts the exact same force on the oceans at all times, and so does the Moon. Since the Moon orbits around the earth, the vector sum of these gravitational forces on each water molecule in the oceans changes over time. This change in direction and magnitude of the gravitational force over time causes both water tides and earth tides (the Earth itself slightly changes shape and bulges as a result of tidal forces). If you paid attention in high school geometry and physics you would know how to vector sum forces.
Crepusuclar rays do not prove that the sun is small and local. It shows that you don't understand optics and linear perspective.
Moonlight being colder than shade is such a vague phrase as to be utterly meaningless. Nevertheless, this has been thoroughly debunked.
https://answersresearchjournal.org/flat-earth-prediction-moonlight-cooling/
The sun is not black. It's just.... not. I don't know how anyone could come to any other conclusion.
Lol Can’t see the curve from 63 miles up according to one of the leading astrophysicists in the world. That breaks the curve calculator. There is an exact curve we should see and it just simply is not there. Look, the earth is flat. Space is fake. Gravity is fake. Dinosaurs are fake. Evolution is fake. There is a dome. Masonic world is falling apart.